Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Denis Benato <benato.denis96@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andy Shevchenko" <andy@kernel.org>,
	"Alex Lanzano" <lanzano.alex@gmail.com>,
	"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	"Derek J. Clark" <derekjohn.clark@gmail.com>,
	"Philip Müller" <philm@manjaro.org>,
	"Justin Weiss" <justin@justinweiss.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] iio: bmi270: suspend and resume triggering on relevant pm operations
Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 10:33:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250525103304.65ba359d@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cddc4a4f-f982-49ec-a03b-3e26038057fe@gmail.com>

On Sat, 24 May 2025 22:25:11 +0200
Denis Benato <benato.denis96@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/12/25 10:54, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 07:15:25PM +0200, Denis Benato wrote:  
> >> Prevent triggers from stop working after the device has entered sleep:
> >> use iio_device_suspend_triggering and iio_device_resume_triggering helpers.  
> > The cover letter call it a fix, where is the Fixes tag?  
> I didn't know if it was okay to use that tag while to root cause is still there and it needs to be fixed for a lot more devices.
> 
> I was also attempting to make this patch very similar to accepted one: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240807185619.7261-3-benato.denis96@gmail.com/
> 
> Is fixed tag appropriate?

I think it probably is appropriate given not having a trigger restart after returning
from suspend is unlikely to be desired behaviour.

Jonathan

> 
> >
> > ...
> >  
> >> +const struct dev_pm_ops bmi270_core_pm_ops = {
> >> +	RUNTIME_PM_OPS(bmi270_core_runtime_suspend,
> >> +		       bmi270_core_runtime_resume, NULL)  
> > One line (it's only 85 characters and it's fine in this case).  
> 
> 
> Okay, will send a new version when I have answer to the above question.
> 
> 
> >> +};  
> > ...
> >  
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_i2c.c
> >> @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
> >>  static struct i2c_driver bmi270_i2c_driver = {
> >>  	.driver = {
> >>  		.name = "bmi270_i2c",
> >> +		.pm = pm_ptr(&bmi270_core_pm_ops),  
> > Is pm.h included?  
> I assumed it was not needed since the i2c_driver definition should be enough.
> 
> 
> I will include pm.h on the next version, thanks.
> 
> 
> >  
> >>  		.acpi_match_table = bmi270_acpi_match,
> >>  		.of_match_table = bmi270_of_match,
> >>  	},
> >> diff --git a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
> >> index 88a77aba5e4f..b25171413531 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/iio/imu/bmi270/bmi270_spi.c
> >> @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id bmi270_of_match[] = {
> >>  static struct spi_driver bmi270_spi_driver = {
> >>  	.driver = {
> >>  		.name = "bmi270",
> >> +		.pm = pm_ptr(&bmi270_core_pm_ops),  
> > Ditto.  
> >>  		.of_match_table = bmi270_of_match,
> >>  	},
> >>  	.probe = bmi270_spi_probe,  
> I don't know how but your answer was lost in my mail.
> 
> Sorry for the late response and thank you for your suggestions,
> Denis
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-25  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-09 17:15 [PATCH 0/2] iio: fix suspend and resume triggering for bmi160 and bmi270 Denis Benato
2025-05-09 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] iio: bmi270: suspend and resume triggering on relevant pm operations Denis Benato
2025-05-12  8:54   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-05-24 20:25     ` Denis Benato
2025-05-25  9:33       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-05-09 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] iio: bmi160: " Denis Benato
2025-05-12  8:55   ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250525103304.65ba359d@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=benato.denis96@gmail.com \
    --cc=derekjohn.clark@gmail.com \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=justin@justinweiss.com \
    --cc=lanzano.alex@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=philm@manjaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox