Linux IIO development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@gmail.com>
Cc: lanzano.alex@gmail.com, dlechner@baylibre.com,
	nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] iio: ABI: document accel and roc event attributes
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 18:21:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250830182125.03ff6e6b@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250830115858.21477-3-gustavograzs@gmail.com>

On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 08:58:57 -0300
Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@gmail.com> wrote:

> Add accelerometer and rate of change event-related sysfs attributes
> exposed by the bmi270 driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Silva <gustavograzs@gmail.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> index 2fb2cea4b192..75a88f0dc533 100644
> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio
> @@ -908,6 +908,7 @@ What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_y_roc_rising_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_y_roc_falling_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_z_roc_rising_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_z_roc_falling_en
> +What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_x&y&z_roc_rising_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_anglvel_x_roc_rising_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_anglvel_x_roc_falling_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_anglvel_y_roc_rising_en
> @@ -1129,6 +1130,7 @@ Description:
>  		will get activated once in_voltage0_raw goes above 1200 and will become
>  		deactivated again once the value falls below 1150.
>  
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_roc_rising_value
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_raw_roc_rising_value
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_raw_roc_falling_value
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_y_raw_roc_rising_value
> @@ -1177,6 +1179,7 @@ Description:
>  
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_thresh_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_thresh_falling_period
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_roc_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_roc_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_x_roc_falling_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_y_thresh_rising_period
> @@ -1187,6 +1190,7 @@ What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_z_thresh_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_z_thresh_falling_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_z_roc_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_z_roc_falling_period
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_mag_adaptive_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_anglvel_x_thresh_rising_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_anglvel_x_thresh_falling_period
>  What:		/sys/.../events/in_anglvel_x_roc_rising_period
> @@ -1344,6 +1348,23 @@ Description:
>  		number or direction is not specified, applies to all channels of
>  		this type.
>  
> +What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_x_mag_adaptive_rising_en
> +What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_y_mag_adaptive_rising_en
> +What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_z_mag_adaptive_rising_en
> +KernelVersion:	2.6.37
> +Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> +		Similar to in_accel_x_thresh[_rising|_falling]_en, but here the
> +		adaptive magnitude of the channel is compared to the threshold.
That seems backwards.  I was thinking of this as

the magnitude of the channel is compared to an adaptive threshold. 

I'm not sure what 'adaptive magnitude of the channel' would mean.

> +
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_mag_adaptive_rising_value
I'm not sure this one needs it's own block.

For the nearest equivalent which is _adaptive_rising_value (which is only documented
for capacitive channels we just put it in the same block as the non _adaptive_ variant.

> +KernelVersion:	2.6.37
> +Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> +		The value to which the reference adaptive magnitude of the channel is
> +		compared. If the axis is not specified, it applies to all channels
> +		of this type.
> +
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_mag_referenced_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_mag_referenced_rising_en
>  What:		/sys/.../iio:deviceX/events/in_accel_mag_referenced_falling_en
> @@ -2386,3 +2407,22 @@ Description:
>  		Value representing the user's attention to the system expressed
>  		in units as percentage. This usually means if the user is
>  		looking at the screen or not.
> +
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_value_available
> +KernelVersion:	6.18
> +Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> +		List of available acceleration threshold values that can be
> +		configured for event generation. Units after application of
> +		scale and offset are m/s^2. Expressed as:
> +

This is generic. What sort of event does it apply to?  Seems like it should
be in_accel_mag_adaptive_value or something along those lines? Might also need
in_acecl_mag_reference_value or even direction specific variants of each.

Whilst the ABI does allow for a broader 'available' to cover for
all channels for instance so this is sort of valid ABI, to me it just
feels non intuitive for a user.    Maybe just adding tot this document
to say that this applies to all forms of event for in_accel channels on
this device is sufficient.

> +		- a range specified as "[min step max]"
> +
> +What:		/sys/.../events/in_accel_period_available

This one feels more reasonable as the idea of all events sharing a period control
is more likely than the values that are accepted being the same for all.

> +KernelVersion:	6.18
> +Contact:	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
> +Description:
> +		List of available periods for accelerometer event detection in
> +		seconds, expressed as:
> +
> +		- a range specified as "[min step max]"


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-08-30 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-30 11:58 [PATCH v5 0/4] BMI270: Add support for step counter and motion events Gustavo Silva
2025-08-30 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] iio: imu: bmi270: add support for " Gustavo Silva
2025-08-30 12:44   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-30 12:47     ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-30 17:00     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-13 12:46     ` Gustavo Silva
2025-09-14 11:40       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-30 11:58 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] iio: ABI: document accel and roc event attributes Gustavo Silva
2025-08-30 12:49   ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-30 17:05     ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-30 17:09       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-30 19:58         ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-31 15:39           ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-08-30 17:21   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-08-30 12:36 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] BMI270: Add support for step counter and motion events Andy Shevchenko
2025-08-30 17:23   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250830182125.03ff6e6b@jic23-huawei \
    --to=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gustavograzs@gmail.com \
    --cc=lanzano.alex@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox