From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, lars@metafoo.de,
andy.shevchenko@gmail.com, david.lechner@sifive.com,
mike@mikelooijmans.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] iio: adc: ti-ads1298: Fix incorrect timeout comment
Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 18:50:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260511185038.2c367a9f@jic23-huawei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510193435.4602-1-shofiqtest@gmail.com>
On Sun, 10 May 2026 22:34:35 +0300
Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com> wrote:
> At the lowest supported data rate of 250Hz, one conversion period is
> 4ms, not 40ms. The 50ms timeout is deliberately conservative to allow
> for kernel scheduling latency, which can be significant under load or
> on slow machines.
>
> Fix the comment to state the correct conversion time, use "lowest sample
> rate" for clarity, and explain that the extra margin exists to absorb
> scheduling latency so that no one is tempted to shrink the timeout to
> match the conversion period.
>
> Also drop the redundant ret variable assignment by using the return value
> of wait_for_completion_timeout() directly in the if() condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Md Shofiqul Islam <shofiqtest@gmail.com>
Hi. Please slow down a bit and perhaps more importantly be careful
with your various series numbers etc. I see the same patch in a series
label v4 then as a patch on it's own labelled v2, one labelled v3 and
2 patches labeled v4 sent a few minute apart
I'm going to pick up the most recent one probably but that might
well be the wrong one!
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Drop the ret assignment for wait_for_completion_timeout(); use the
> return value directly in the if() condition (Andy Shevchenko)
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Fix multi-line comment style: move comment text to its own line
> after '/*' (Andy Shevchenko)
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Correct conversion time to 4ms (was wrong 40ms), add scheduling
> latency explanation, clarify "lowest sample rate" (David Lechner,
> Andy Shevchenko)
>
> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1298.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1298.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1298.c
> index ae30b47e45..25261163d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1298.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads1298.c
> @@ -210,9 +210,11 @@ static int ads1298_read_one(struct ads1298_private *priv, int chan_index)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - /* Cannot take longer than 40ms (250Hz) */
> - ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->completion, msecs_to_jiffies(50));
> - if (!ret)
> + /*
> + * One conversion takes at most 4ms at the lowest sample rate (250Hz).
> + * Use 50ms to allow for kernel scheduling latency.
> + */
> + if (!wait_for_completion_timeout(&priv->completion, msecs_to_jiffies(50)))
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> return 0;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-11 17:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260509071910.12345-1-shofiqtest@gmail.com>
2026-05-10 8:45 ` [PATCH v2] iio: adc: ti-ads1298: Fix incorrect timeout comment Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 10:16 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-10 12:38 ` [PATCH v3] " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-10 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-10 19:34 ` [PATCH v4] " Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-11 17:50 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-05-10 19:36 ` Md Shofiqul Islam
2026-05-11 16:03 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260511185038.2c367a9f@jic23-huawei \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=david.lechner@sifive.com \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike@mikelooijmans.nl \
--cc=shofiqtest@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox