Re: [PATCH 3/8] iio: magnetometer: ak8975: switch to using managed resources

[Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>]

On Tue, 12 May 2026 11:23:37 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 10:12:35AM +0200, Joshua Crofts wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 May 2026 at 10:06, Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@gmail.com> wrote:  
> > > > This is to prevent a resource leak. If we register the power_off
> > > > function at the end,
> > > > any potential probe() failures will leave the regulators on.  
> > >
> > > Okay it does make sense! I now see the action is registered after
> > > ak8975_power_on() which what makes sense. Still would like to avoid that
> > > weird pm_runtime_set_active() call. It would be nice if we could
> > > guarantee through PM that the device get's suspended on unbind. Oh well,
> > > I guess this is ok.  
> > 
> > FYI, there is a new version where I addressed some of your comments.  
> 
> Btw, can we rearrange the patches that the most controversial one(s?) will go
> at the end (as much as possible) of the new series? Then we can work on it with
> a less burden and unneeded dragging of the 'good' patches. Jonathan, what do
> you think?
> 

Definitely. I'm swamped (or as it's otherwise known neglecting the other
stuff I supposedly maintain). So anything that allows me to pick up partial
sets would be most welcome.

Jonathan