Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:46:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610154602.8BC281F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-2-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Out-of-bounds read and unaligned access in capture_sample callbacks
--

commit 4cc56ddc040c8b55845a800e3ad9e90ea9d698c9
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned

This patch changes the usage_id parameter type from unsigned to u32 in
hid-sensor-accel-3d callbacks to match the expected API type.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> index 2bf05ab5235ef..42c4259bf2094 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/accel/hid-sensor-accel-3d.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ static int accel_3d_proc_event(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>  
>  /* Capture samples in local storage */
>  static int accel_3d_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> -				unsigned usage_id,
> +				u32 usage_id,
>  				size_t raw_len, char *raw_data,
>  				void *priv)
>  {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since we are looking at the signature of
accel_3d_capture_sample(), is there a risk of an out-of-bounds read or
unaligned access when dereferencing raw_data?

Further down in accel_3d_capture_sample(), raw_data is unconditionally
cast and dereferenced without verifying raw_len:

	switch (usage_id) {
	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ACCEL_X_AXIS:
	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ACCEL_Y_AXIS:
	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ACCEL_Z_AXIS:
		offset = usage_id - HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ACCEL_X_AXIS;
		accel_state->scan.accel_val[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X + offset] =
						*(u32 *)raw_data;
		ret = 0;
	break;
	case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TIME_TIMESTAMP:
		accel_state->timestamp =
			hid_sensor_convert_timestamp(
					&accel_state->common_attributes,
					*(int64_t *)raw_data);

Could a malicious or non-compliant HID device provide a report descriptor
with a smaller size (e.g., 1 byte) for these usages, causing the dereference
to read up to 7 bytes past the end of the allocated report buffer?

Also, since raw_data is a byte pointer originating from the HID core, could
casting it directly to u32* or int64_t* trigger an unaligned access exception
on architectures that do not support unaligned memory access?

Does this same pattern need to be addressed in gyro_3d_capture_sample()
within drivers/iio/gyro/hid-sensor-gyro-3d.c? It appears to perform the
same unconditional casts to u32* and s64* on raw_data.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-0-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 15:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] HID: iio: basic clean up for usage_id Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:46   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:55   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610154602.8BC281F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox