Linux Input/HID development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: use u32 instead of unsigned
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:47:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610154711.064001F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-3-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Directly casting the `raw_data` byte array to `u32*` and `s64*` in capture callbacks causes unaligned memory accesses, incorrect endianness handling, and potential out-of-bounds reads.
--

commit 8c6bb48eb0d753aea033d76922dc45a105550e60
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

iio: light: hid-sensor-als: use u32 instead of unsigned
    
Prefer 'u32' instead of bare 'unsigned' for usage_id variable.
This matches expected callback API type and improves code clarity.

> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> index d72e260b82668..ae2fda8dc500a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/hid-sensor-als.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int als_proc_event(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
>  
>  /* Capture samples in local storage */
>  static int als_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> -				unsigned usage_id,
> +				u32 usage_id,
>  				size_t raw_len, char *raw_data,
>  				void *priv)
>  {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the direct cast in this function cause
unaligned memory accesses or endianness issues?

Just a few lines down in als_capture_sample(), raw_data is cast directly:

	int ret = -EINVAL;
	u32 sample_data = *(u32 *)raw_data;

The HID sensor hub core passes a byte pointer raw_data which points directly
into the raw HID report. In sensor_hub_report(), the pointer is incremented
by 1 to skip the report ID, making it immediately unaligned.

Dereferencing this unaligned pointer directly via *(u32 *) or *(s64 *) can
cause unaligned memory access faults on architectures that do not support
them. 

Additionally, since HID reports are strictly little-endian, a direct
cast on a big-endian host might result in corrupted sensor data.

Should this code use get_unaligned_le32() and get_unaligned_le64() instead,
and also validate that raw_len is sufficient to prevent out-of-bounds reads?

The same direct cast pattern appears to be present in other HID sensors,
such as accel_3d_capture_sample() and gyro_3d_capture_sample().

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-0-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com?part=3

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-10 15:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] HID: iio: basic clean up for usage_id Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:55   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260610154711.064001F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox