From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sanjay Chitroda" <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:51:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610155115.4741A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-5-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unconditional pointer casts in `incl_3d_capture_sample` cause unaligned memory access, endianness mismatch, and out-of-bounds field reads.
--
commit ffa9a4c020f23415f0ba3c3eae4063a4d5e16403
Author: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned
This commit replaces the bare 'unsigned' type with 'u32' for the usage_id
variable in several callback handlers. This change aligns the code with the
expected callback API types and improves clarity. There are no functional
changes introduced by this patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-incl-3d.c b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-incl-3d.c
> index 4e23a598a3fb9..c7fbff498be7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-incl-3d.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/orientation/hid-sensor-incl-3d.c
[ ... ]
> /* Capture samples in local storage */
> static int incl_3d_capture_sample(struct hid_sensor_hub_device *hsdev,
> - unsigned usage_id,
> + u32 usage_id,
> size_t raw_len, char *raw_data,
> void *priv)
> {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while reviewing this signature update I
noticed a potential memory access problem.
Looking further down in incl_3d_capture_sample(), raw_data is directly cast
and dereferenced:
switch (usage_id) {
case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_ORIENT_TILT_X:
incl_state->scan.incl_val[CHANNEL_SCAN_INDEX_X] = *(u32 *)raw_data;
And for timestamps:
case HID_USAGE_SENSOR_TIME_TIMESTAMP:
incl_state->timestamp =
hid_sensor_convert_timestamp(&incl_state->common_attributes,
*(s64 *)raw_data);
Can this direct pointer casting trigger unaligned memory access exceptions on
architectures that do not natively support them?
Additionally, since HID report data is explicitly little-endian, does casting
the byte stream to a native u32 or s64 pointer cause it to read reversed
bytes on big-endian architectures?
Finally, the callback does not appear to check the raw_len parameter. If the
HID field is 16-bit or a 32-bit timestamp, will the unconditional 32-bit or
64-bit dereference fetch adjacent HID fields or uninitialized buffer padding,
potentially corrupting the reported sensor value?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610-6-june-hid-iio-correct-usage-id-v2-0-c3c5f0720493@gmail.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 15:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] HID: iio: basic clean up for usage_id Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iio: gyro: hid-sensor-gyro-3d: use u32 instead of unsigned Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iio: accel: hid-sensor-accel-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-als: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iio: light: hid-sensor-prox: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-incl-3d: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iio: orientation: hid-sensor-rotation: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 15:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iio: pressure: hid-sensor-press: " Sanjay Chitroda
2026-06-10 15:55 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610155115.4741A1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox