From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linmao Li" <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 03:48:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720034855.07D8C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720033030.1580891-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Use-After-Free or NULL pointer dereference in byd_process_byte() due to missing RX synchronization during disconnect.
- [High] Improper timer teardown API allows the timer to be re-armed after sync, causing a delayed Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data ---
commit eb1fe8255d54e5e900b504d5aed98e3fff1721fb
Author: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data
byd_disconnect() uses timer_delete() before freeing the driver's private
data. This does not wait for a running byd_clear_touch() callback, which
dereferences the private data and its psmouse pointer. A callback racing
with disconnect can therefore access the private data after it has been
freed.
Use timer_delete_sync() to wait for any running callback before releasing
the private data.
Fixes: 2d5f5611dd0d ("Input: byd - enable absolute mode")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c b/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> index f5770a3af2f12..7a69724c1ac6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static void byd_disconnect(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> struct byd_data *priv = psmouse->private;
>
> if (priv) {
> - timer_delete(&priv->timer);
> + timer_delete_sync(&priv->timer);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does timer_delete_sync()
prevent the timer from being re-armed concurrently?
Because device interrupts are not disabled during byd_disconnect(),
byd_process_byte() can execute immediately after timer_delete_sync()
returns but before psmouse->private is freed.
If byd_process_byte() processes a touch event, it can call mod_timer()
and successfully re-arm the timer on the priv structure:
drivers/input/mouse/byd.c:byd_process_byte() {
...
mod_timer(&priv->timer, jiffies + BYD_TOUCH_TIMEOUT);
...
}
When byd_disconnect() subsequently frees priv, won't the timer callback
execute on the freed memory?
Should this use timer_shutdown_sync() instead to permanently prevent the timer
from being re-armed during teardown?
> kfree(psmouse->private);
> psmouse->private = NULL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for an interrupt to trigger
byd_process_byte() concurrently with or immediately after freeing this memory?
The core psmouse_disconnect() function invokes the driver's disconnect callback
without first stopping device interrupts (such as by using serio_pause_rx()).
If the hardware sends a byte during device teardown, ps2_interrupt() can
route the data to the active protocol handler byd_process_byte(). This
unconditionally dereferences the freed or NULL psmouse->private pointer:
drivers/input/mouse/byd.c:byd_process_byte() {
struct byd_data *priv = psmouse->private;
...
}
Does the receive path need to be paused or synchronized before freeing the
private data to prevent a use-after-free or NULL pointer dereference?
> }
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720033030.1580891-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 3:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 3:30 [PATCH] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data Linmao Li
2026-07-20 3:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-20 5:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-07-20 6:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Linmao Li
2026-07-20 6:26 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720034855.07D8C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lilinmao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox