From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linmao Li" <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 06:26:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720062622.069C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260720061259.1601281-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent execution of the protocol handler `byd_process_byte()` during or after `byd_disconnect()` can lead to a Use-After-Free or NULL pointer dereference of the driver's private data.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data ---
commit e08a94a088b6cedd4010692fa9ab4cd3e5287e71
Author: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data
byd_disconnect() uses timer_delete() before freeing the driver's private
data. This does not wait for a running byd_clear_touch() callback, which
dereferences the private data and its psmouse pointer. A callback racing
with disconnect can therefore access the private data after it has been
freed. The timer can also still be re-armed by byd_process_byte() while
the disconnect is in progress.
Use timer_shutdown_sync() before freeing the private data: it waits for
a running callback and turns any later re-arm attempt into a no-op.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c b/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> index f5770a3af2f12..5fc3c629590ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/mouse/byd.c
> @@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static void byd_disconnect(struct psmouse *psmouse)
> struct byd_data *priv = psmouse->private;
>
> if (priv) {
> - timer_delete(&priv->timer);
> + timer_shutdown_sync(&priv->timer);
> kfree(psmouse->private);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but could this free lead to a use-after-free
or null pointer dereference if a hardware interrupt occurs concurrently?
During disconnect, the psmouse core sets the software state to
PSMOUSE_CMD_MODE in psmouse_disconnect(), which still allows the interrupt
handler to process incoming bytes.
If a full packet is received, the protocol handler byd_process_byte() is
called and unconditionally dereferences psmouse->private, which may have
just been freed or set to NULL:
drivers/input/mouse/byd.c:byd_process_byte() {
struct byd_data *priv = psmouse->private;
...
switch (pkt[3]) {
case BYD_PACKET_ABSOLUTE:
if (!priv->touch) {
...
}
Should the state be set to PSMOUSE_IGNORE or the RX queue otherwise paused
before we free the private data here?
> psmouse->private = NULL;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260720061259.1601281-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-20 6:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 3:30 [PATCH] Input: byd - synchronize timer deletion before freeing private data Linmao Li
2026-07-20 3:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-20 5:18 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-07-20 6:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Linmao Li
2026-07-20 6:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260720062622.069C01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=lilinmao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox