From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append()
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:03:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916220355.252592-50-paul@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-36-paul@paul-moore.com>
Rename append_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_append() to better match
convention and do some rework. The rework includes moving the
LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE logic from lsm_prepare() to lsm_order_append()
in order to consolidate the individual LSM append/activation code,
and adding logic to skip appending explicitly disabled LSMs to the
active LSM list.
Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johhansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/lsm_init.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/lsm_init.c b/security/lsm_init.c
index ec46ddb18e1e..a314484d7c2f 100644
--- a/security/lsm_init.c
+++ b/security/lsm_init.c
@@ -124,24 +124,48 @@ static bool __init lsm_order_exists(struct lsm_info *lsm)
return false;
}
-/* Append an LSM to the list of ordered LSMs to initialize. */
-static int last_lsm __initdata;
-static void __init append_ordered_lsm(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *from)
+/**
+ * lsm_order_append - Append a LSM to the ordered list
+ * @lsm: LSM definition
+ * @src: source of the addition
+ *
+ * Append @lsm to the enabled LSM array after ensuring that it hasn't been
+ * explicitly disabled, is a duplicate entry, or would run afoul of the
+ * LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE logic.
+ */
+static void __init lsm_order_append(struct lsm_info *lsm, const char *src)
{
/* Ignore duplicate selections. */
if (lsm_order_exists(lsm))
return;
- if (WARN(last_lsm == MAX_LSM_COUNT, "%s: out of LSM static calls!?\n", from))
- return;
+ /* Skip explicitly disabled LSMs. */
+ if (lsm->enabled && !lsm_is_enabled(lsm))
+ goto out;
- /* Enable this LSM, if it is not already set. */
- if (!lsm->enabled)
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
- lsm_order[last_lsm] = lsm;
- lsm_idlist[last_lsm++] = lsm->id;
+ if (WARN(lsm_active_cnt == MAX_LSM_COUNT,
+ "%s: out of LSM static calls!?\n", src)) {
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
+ goto out;
+ }
- init_debug("%s ordered: %s (%s)\n", from, lsm->id->name,
+ if (lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) {
+ if (lsm_exclusive) {
+ init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
+ goto out;
+ } else {
+ init_debug("exclusive chosen: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
+ lsm_exclusive = lsm;
+ }
+ }
+
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
+ lsm_order[lsm_active_cnt] = lsm;
+ lsm_idlist[lsm_active_cnt++] = lsm->id;
+
+out:
+ init_debug("%s ordered: %s (%s)\n", src, lsm->id->name,
lsm_is_enabled(lsm) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
}
@@ -163,26 +187,12 @@ static void __init lsm_set_blob_size(int *need, int *lbs)
*/
static void __init lsm_prepare(struct lsm_info *lsm)
{
- struct lsm_blob_sizes *blobs;
+ struct lsm_blob_sizes *blobs = lsm->blobs;
- if (!lsm_is_enabled(lsm)) {
- lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
+ if (!blobs)
return;
- } else if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && lsm_exclusive) {
- init_debug("exclusive disabled: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
- lsm_enabled_set(lsm, false);
- return;
- }
-
- /* Mark the LSM as enabled. */
- lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
- if ((lsm->flags & LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) && !lsm_exclusive) {
- init_debug("exclusive chosen: %s\n", lsm->id->name);
- lsm_exclusive = lsm;
- }
/* Register the LSM blob sizes. */
- blobs = lsm->blobs;
lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_cred, &blob_sizes.lbs_cred);
lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_file, &blob_sizes.lbs_file);
lsm_set_blob_size(&blobs->lbs_ib, &blob_sizes.lbs_ib);
@@ -227,7 +237,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
/* LSM_ORDER_FIRST is always first. */
lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_FIRST)
- append_ordered_lsm(lsm, " first");
+ lsm_order_append(lsm, " first");
}
/* Process "security=", if given. */
@@ -259,7 +269,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
if (strcmp(lsm->id->name, name) == 0) {
if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE)
- append_ordered_lsm(lsm, origin);
+ lsm_order_append(lsm, origin);
found = true;
}
}
@@ -275,14 +285,14 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_parse(const char *order, const char *origin)
if (lsm_order_exists(lsm))
continue;
if (strcmp(lsm->id->name, lsm_order_legacy) == 0)
- append_ordered_lsm(lsm, "security=");
+ lsm_order_append(lsm, "security=");
}
}
/* LSM_ORDER_LAST is always last. */
lsm_for_each_raw(lsm) {
if (lsm->order == LSM_ORDER_LAST)
- append_ordered_lsm(lsm, " last");
+ lsm_order_append(lsm, " last");
}
/* Disable all LSMs not in the ordered list. */
@@ -415,8 +425,8 @@ int __init early_security_init(void)
struct lsm_info *lsm;
lsm_early_for_each_raw(lsm) {
- if (!lsm->enabled)
- lsm->enabled = &lsm_enabled_true;
+ lsm_enabled_set(lsm, true);
+ lsm_order_append(lsm, "early");
lsm_prepare(lsm);
initialize_lsm(lsm);
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-09-30 20:11 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916220355.252592-50-paul@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox