Linux Integrity Measurement development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
	"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
	"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: move initcalls to the LSM framework
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:03:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916220355.252592-62-paul@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-36-paul@paul-moore.com>

As the LSM framework only supports one LSM initcall callback for each
initcall type, the init_smk_fs() and smack_nf_ip_init() functions were
wrapped with a new function, smack_initcall() that is registered with
the LSM framework.

Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johhansen@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
 security/smack/smack.h           | 14 ++++++++++++++
 security/smack/smack_lsm.c       |  9 +++++++++
 security/smack/smack_netfilter.c |  4 +---
 security/smack/smackfs.c         |  4 +---
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/smack/smack.h b/security/smack/smack.h
index bf6a6ed3946c..c56e1e876f7c 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack.h
+++ b/security/smack/smack.h
@@ -275,6 +275,20 @@ struct smk_audit_info {
 #endif
 };
 
+/*
+ * Initialization
+ */
+#if defined(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK_NETFILTER)
+int smack_nf_ip_init(void);
+#else
+static inline int smack_nf_ip_init(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+int init_smk_fs(void);
+int smack_initcall(void);
+
 /*
  * These functions are in smack_access.c
  */
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
index e09490c75f59..f14d536c516b 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_lsm.c
@@ -5270,6 +5270,14 @@ static __init int smack_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int __init smack_initcall(void)
+{
+	int rc_fs = init_smk_fs();
+	int rc_nf = smack_nf_ip_init();
+
+	return rc_fs ? rc_fs : rc_nf;
+}
+
 /*
  * Smack requires early initialization in order to label
  * all processes and objects when they are created.
@@ -5279,4 +5287,5 @@ DEFINE_LSM(smack) = {
 	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
 	.blobs = &smack_blob_sizes,
 	.init = smack_init,
+	.initcall_device = smack_initcall,
 };
diff --git a/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c b/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
index 8fd747b3653a..17ba578b1308 100644
--- a/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
+++ b/security/smack/smack_netfilter.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static struct pernet_operations smack_net_ops = {
 	.exit = smack_nf_unregister,
 };
 
-static int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
+int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
 {
 	if (smack_enabled == 0)
 		return 0;
@@ -76,5 +76,3 @@ static int __init smack_nf_ip_init(void)
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "Smack: Registering netfilter hooks\n");
 	return register_pernet_subsys(&smack_net_ops);
 }
-
-__initcall(smack_nf_ip_init);
diff --git a/security/smack/smackfs.c b/security/smack/smackfs.c
index b1e5e62f5cbd..405ace6db109 100644
--- a/security/smack/smackfs.c
+++ b/security/smack/smackfs.c
@@ -2978,7 +2978,7 @@ static struct vfsmount *smackfs_mount;
  * Returns true if we were not chosen on boot or if
  * we were chosen and filesystem registration succeeded.
  */
-static int __init init_smk_fs(void)
+int __init init_smk_fs(void)
 {
 	int err;
 	int rc;
@@ -3021,5 +3021,3 @@ static int __init init_smk_fs(void)
 
 	return err;
 }
-
-__initcall(init_smk_fs);
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-16 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52         ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27     ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-09-30 20:11   ` Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21       ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250916220355.252592-62-paul@paul-moore.com \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wufan@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox