From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "John Johansen" <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
"Mimi Zohar" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
"Roberto Sassu" <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
"Fan Wu" <wufan@kernel.org>, "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
"Micah Morton" <mortonm@chromium.org>,
"Casey Schaufler" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Nicolas Bouchinet" <nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr>,
"Xiu Jianfeng" <xiujianfeng@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: move initcalls to the LSM framework
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 18:03:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250916220355.252592-67-paul@paul-moore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250916220355.252592-36-paul@paul-moore.com>
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
This patch converts IMA and EVM to use the LSM frameworks's initcall
mechanism. It moved the integrity_fs_init() call to ima_fs_init() and
evm_init_secfs(), to work around the fact that there is no "integrity" LSM,
and introduced integrity_fs_fini() to remove the integrity directory, if
empty. Both integrity_fs_init() and integrity_fs_fini() support the
scenario of being called by both the IMA and EVM LSMs.
This patch does not touch any of the platform certificate code that
lives under the security/integrity/platform_certs directory as the
IMA/EVM developers would prefer to address that in a future patchset.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
[PM: adjust description as discussed over email]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
---
security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c | 3 +--
security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c | 11 +++++++++--
security/integrity/iint.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 11 +++++++++--
security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 4 ++--
security/integrity/integrity.h | 2 ++
6 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
index db8e324ed4e6..73d500a375cb 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_main.c
@@ -1179,6 +1179,5 @@ DEFINE_LSM(evm) = {
.init = init_evm_lsm,
.order = LSM_ORDER_LAST,
.blobs = &evm_blob_sizes,
+ .initcall_late = init_evm,
};
-
-late_initcall(init_evm);
diff --git a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
index b0d2aad27850..c26724690cec 100644
--- a/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/evm/evm_secfs.c
@@ -302,10 +302,16 @@ int __init evm_init_secfs(void)
int error = 0;
struct dentry *dentry;
- evm_dir = securityfs_create_dir("evm", integrity_dir);
- if (IS_ERR(evm_dir))
+ error = integrity_fs_init();
+ if (error < 0)
return -EFAULT;
+ evm_dir = securityfs_create_dir("evm", integrity_dir);
+ if (IS_ERR(evm_dir)) {
+ error = -EFAULT;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
dentry = securityfs_create_file("evm", 0660,
evm_dir, NULL, &evm_key_ops);
if (IS_ERR(dentry)) {
@@ -329,5 +335,6 @@ int __init evm_init_secfs(void)
out:
securityfs_remove(evm_symlink);
securityfs_remove(evm_dir);
+ integrity_fs_fini();
return error;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/iint.c b/security/integrity/iint.c
index 068ac6c2ae1e..8ec1a3436a71 100644
--- a/security/integrity/iint.c
+++ b/security/integrity/iint.c
@@ -42,8 +42,11 @@ void __init integrity_load_keys(void)
evm_load_x509();
}
-static int __init integrity_fs_init(void)
+int __init integrity_fs_init(void)
{
+ if (integrity_dir)
+ return 0;
+
integrity_dir = securityfs_create_dir("integrity", NULL);
if (IS_ERR(integrity_dir)) {
int ret = PTR_ERR(integrity_dir);
@@ -58,4 +61,11 @@ static int __init integrity_fs_init(void)
return 0;
}
-late_initcall(integrity_fs_init)
+void __init integrity_fs_fini(void)
+{
+ if (!integrity_dir || !simple_empty(integrity_dir))
+ return;
+
+ securityfs_remove(integrity_dir);
+ integrity_dir = NULL;
+}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
index 87045b09f120..012a58959ff0 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c
@@ -499,9 +499,15 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void)
struct dentry *dentry;
int ret;
+ ret = integrity_fs_init();
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir);
- if (IS_ERR(ima_dir))
- return PTR_ERR(ima_dir);
+ if (IS_ERR(ima_dir)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(ima_dir);
+ goto out;
+ }
ima_symlink = securityfs_create_symlink("ima", NULL, "integrity/ima",
NULL);
@@ -555,6 +561,7 @@ int __init ima_fs_init(void)
out:
securityfs_remove(ima_symlink);
securityfs_remove(ima_dir);
+ integrity_fs_fini();
return ret;
}
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
index eade8e1e3cb1..b703bfc2f470 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
@@ -1283,6 +1283,6 @@ DEFINE_LSM(ima) = {
.init = init_ima_lsm,
.order = LSM_ORDER_LAST,
.blobs = &ima_blob_sizes,
+ /* Start IMA after the TPM is available */
+ .initcall_late = init_ima,
};
-
-late_initcall(init_ima); /* Start IMA after the TPM is available */
diff --git a/security/integrity/integrity.h b/security/integrity/integrity.h
index c2c2da691123..7b388b66cf80 100644
--- a/security/integrity/integrity.h
+++ b/security/integrity/integrity.h
@@ -114,6 +114,8 @@ struct ima_file_id {
int integrity_kernel_read(struct file *file, loff_t offset,
void *addr, unsigned long count);
+int __init integrity_fs_init(void);
+void __init integrity_fs_fini(void);
#define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_EVM 0
#define INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA 1
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-16 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-16 22:03 [PATCH v4 0/34] Rework the LSM initialization Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 01/34] lsm: split the notifier code out into lsm_notifier.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 02/34] lsm: split the init code out into lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 03/34] lsm: consolidate lsm_allowed() and prepare_lsm() into lsm_prepare() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 04/34] lsm: introduce looping macros for the initialization code Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 05/34] lsm: integrate report_lsm_order() code into caller Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 06/34] lsm: integrate lsm_early_cred() and lsm_early_task() " Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 07/34] lsm: rename ordered_lsm_init() to lsm_init_ordered() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 10:45 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 08/34] lsm: replace the name field with a pointer to the lsm_id struct Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 09/34] lsm: rename the lsm order variables for consistency Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 10/34] lsm: rework lsm_active_cnt and lsm_idlist[] Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:02 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 11/34] lsm: get rid of the lsm_names list and do some cleanup Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-21 19:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-22 10:52 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-22 21:52 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 12/34] lsm: rework the LSM enable/disable setter/getter functions Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:04 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 13/34] lsm: rename exists_ordered_lsm() to lsm_order_exists() Paul Moore
2025-09-19 19:05 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 14/34] lsm: rename/rework append_ordered_lsm() into lsm_order_append() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 15/34] lsm: rename/rework ordered_lsm_parse() to lsm_order_parse() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:29 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:38 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:55 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 16/34] lsm: cleanup the LSM blob size code Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 17/34] lsm: cleanup initialize_lsm() and rename to lsm_init_single() Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:28 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 18/34] lsm: fold lsm_init_ordered() into security_init() Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 19/34] lsm: add/tweak function header comment blocks in lsm_init.c Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 20/34] lsm: cleanup the debug and console output " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 15:50 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:54 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 21/34] lsm: output available LSMs when debugging Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:11 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 22/34] lsm: group lsm_order_parse() with the other lsm_order_*() functions Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 23/34] lsm: introduce an initcall mechanism into the LSM framework Paul Moore
2025-09-18 17:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 24/34] loadpin: move initcalls to " Paul Moore
2025-09-18 11:15 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-18 15:27 ` Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 25/34] ipe: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 26/34] smack: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 27/34] tomoyo: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 28/34] safesetid: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 29/34] apparmor: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 30/34] lockdown: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:03 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2025-09-30 20:11 ` [PATCH v4 31/34] ima,evm: " Paul Moore
2025-10-01 17:03 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-01 17:23 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 16:53 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-10 19:21 ` Paul Moore
2025-10-10 10:19 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-16 22:03 ` [PATCH v4 32/34] selinux: " Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 33/34] lsm: consolidate all of the LSM framework initcalls Paul Moore
2025-09-16 22:04 ` [PATCH v4 34/34] lsm: add a LSM_STARTED_ALL notification event Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250916220355.252592-67-paul@paul-moore.com \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
--cc=nicolas.bouchinet@oss.cyber.gouv.fr \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wufan@kernel.org \
--cc=xiujianfeng@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox