From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: kevin.tian@intel.com, will@kernel.org, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
joro@8bytes.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, shuah@kernel.org,
nicolinc@nvidia.com, aik@amd.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:37:37 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250715133737.GO2067380@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715063245.1799534-5-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 02:32:41PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> Destroy iommufd_vdevice (vdev) on iommufd_idevice (idev) destruction so
> that vdev can't outlive idev.
>
> idev represents the physical device bound to iommufd, while the vdev
> represents the virtual instance of the physical device in the VM. The
> lifecycle of the vdev should not be longer than idev. This doesn't
> cause real problem on existing use cases cause vdev doesn't impact the
> physical device, only provides virtualization information. But to
> extend vdev for Confidential Computing (CC), there are needs to do
> secure configuration for the vdev, e.g. TSM Bind/Unbind. These
> configurations should be rolled back on idev destroy, or the external
> driver (VFIO) functionality may be impact.
>
> The idev is created by external driver so its destruction can't fail.
> The idev implements pre_destroy() op to actively remove its associated
> vdev before destroying itself. There are 3 cases on idev pre_destroy():
>
> 1. vdev is already destroyed by userspace. No extra handling needed.
> 2. vdev is still alive. Use iommufd_object_tombstone_user() to
> destroy vdev and tombstone the vdev ID.
> 3. vdev is being destroyed by userspace. The vdev ID is already
> freed, but vdev destroy handler is not completed. This requires
> multi-threads syncing - vdev holds idev's short term users
> reference until vdev destruction completes, idev leverages
> existing wait_shortterm mechanism for syncing.
>
> idev should also block any new reference to it after pre_destroy(),
> or the following wait shortterm would timeout. Introduce a 'destroying'
> flag, set it to true on idev pre_destroy(). Any attempt to reference
> idev should honor this flag under the protection of
> idev->igroup->lock.
>
> Originally-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Suggested-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Co-developed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/device.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/iommufd_private.h | 12 ++++++
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/main.c | 2 +
> drivers/iommu/iommufd/viommu.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/iommufd.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/iommufd.h | 5 +++
> 6 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 6:32 [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] iommufd/viommu: Roll back to use iommufd_object_alloc() for vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] iommufd: Add a pre_destroy() op for objects Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 18:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:09 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 20:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:23 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] iommufd: Rename some shortterm-related identifiers Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 19:33 ` [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250715133737.GO2067380@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox