From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <jgg@nvidia.com>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
<iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<joro@8bytes.org>, <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <shuah@kernel.org>,
<aik@amd.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 12:33:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aHatBn28RmpGzGOB@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250715063245.1799534-1-yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Jul 15, 2025 at 02:32:37PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> It is to solve the lifecycle issue that vdevice may outlive idevice. It
> is a prerequisite for TIO, to ensure extra secure configurations (e.g.
> TSM Bind/Unbind) against vdevice could be rolled back on idevice unbind,
> so that VFIO could still work on the physical device without surprise.
>
> Changelog:
> v5:
> - Further rebase to iommufd for-next 601b1d0d9395
> - Keep the xa_empty() check in iommufd_fops_release(), update comments
> - Move the *idev next to *viommu for struct iommufd_vdevice
> - Update the description about IOMMUFD_CMD_VDEVICE_ALLOC for lifecycle
> - Remove Baolu's tag for patch 4 because of big changes since v3
> - Add changelog about idev->destroying
> - Adjust line wrappings for tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c
> - Clarify that no testing for tombstoned ID repurposing.
> - Add review tags.
With the patch that I attached in my reply to PATCH-5, sanity works
fine per iommufd's selftest and by testing tegra241-cmdqv in a VM.
So, upon fixing the build break in PATCH-5 (maybe for a v6),
Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-15 6:32 [PATCH v5 0/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on device unbind Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] iommufd/viommu: Roll back to use iommufd_object_alloc() for vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] iommufd: Add iommufd_object_tombstone_user() helper Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] iommufd: Add a pre_destroy() op for objects Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] iommufd: Destroy vdevice on idevice destroy Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:37 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] iommufd/vdevice: Remove struct device reference from struct vdevice Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 18:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:09 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 20:44 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] iommufd/selftest: Explicitly skip tests for inapplicable variant Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-16 6:23 ` Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for vdevice tombstone Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 19:03 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 6:32 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] iommufd: Rename some shortterm-related identifiers Xu Yilun
2025-07-15 13:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-15 19:13 ` Nicolin Chen
2025-07-15 19:33 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aHatBn28RmpGzGOB@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox