From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Vasant Hegde <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, security@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/sva: Invalidate KVA range on kernel TLB flush
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:57:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2080aaea-0d6e-418e-8391-ddac9b39c109@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250709111527.5ba9bc31@DESKTOP-0403QTC.>
Hi Jacob,
On 7/10/25 02:15, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 13:27:24 -0300
> Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 08:51:58AM -0700, Jacob Pan wrote:
>>>> In the IOMMU Shared Virtual Addressing (SVA) context, the IOMMU
>>>> hardware shares and walks the CPU's page tables. Architectures
>>>> like x86 share static kernel address mappings across all user
>>>> page tables, allowing the IOMMU to access the kernel portion of
>>>> these tables.
>>
>>> Is there a use case where a SVA user can access kernel memory in the
>>> first place?
>>
>> No. It should be fully blocked.
>>
> Then I don't understand what is the "vulnerability condition" being
> addressed here. We are talking about KVA range here.
Let me take a real example:
A device might be mistakenly configured to access memory at IOVA
0xffffa866001d5000 (a vmalloc'd memory region) with user-mode access
permission. The corresponding page table entries for this IOVA
translation, assuming a five-level page table, would appear as follows:
PGD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1)
P4D: Entry present with U/S bit set (1)
PUD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1)
PMD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1)
PTE: Entry present with U/S bit clear (0)
When the IOMMU walks this page table, it may potentially cache all
present entries, regardless of the U/S bit's state. Upon reaching the
leaf PTE, the IOMMU performs a permission check. This involves comparing
the device's DMA access mode (in this case, user mode) against the
cumulative U/S permission derived from an AND operation across all U/S
bits in the traversed page table entries (which here results in U/S ==
0).
The IOMMU correctly blocks this DMA access because the device's
requested access (user mode) exceeds the permissions granted by the page
table (supervisor-only at the PTE level). However, the PGD, P4D, PUD,
and PMD entries that were traversed might remain cached within the
IOMMU's paging structure cache.
Now, consider a scenario where the page table leaf page is freed and
subsequently repurposed, and the U/S bit at its previous location is
modified to 1. From the IOMMU's perspective, the page table for the
aforementioned IOVA would now appear as follows:
PGD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1) [retrieved from paging cache]
P4D: Entry present with U/S bit set (1) [retrieved from paging cache]
PUD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1) [retrieved from paging cache]
PMD: Entry present with U/S bit set (1) [retrieved from paging cache]
PTE: Entry present with U/S bit set (1) {read from physical memory}
As a result, the device could then potentially access the memory at IOVA
0xffffa866001d5000 with user-mode permission, which was explicitly
disallowed.
Thanks,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-10 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-04 13:30 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/sva: Invalidate KVA range on kernel TLB flush Lu Baolu
2025-07-04 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-05 3:50 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-05 9:06 ` Vasant Hegde
2025-07-08 5:42 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-08 12:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-08 14:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 1:25 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-09 15:51 ` Jacob Pan
2025-07-09 16:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-09 18:15 ` Jacob Pan
2025-07-09 18:22 ` Dave Hansen
2025-07-09 18:44 ` Jacob Pan
2025-07-09 18:54 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-14 12:39 ` David Laight
2025-07-14 13:19 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-07-14 14:50 ` Mike Rapoport
2025-07-15 0:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2025-07-15 1:19 ` Baolu Lu
2025-07-10 2:57 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2025-07-10 15:28 ` Jacob Pan
2025-07-10 15:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-07-11 14:36 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2080aaea-0d6e-418e-8391-ddac9b39c109@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.pan@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox