From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Log better event records
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 12:00:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxqZX3BxaM3Uhll3@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024131511.GH30704@willie-the-truck>
On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 02:15:12PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > +static void arm_smmu_dump_event(struct arm_smmu_event *evt, struct ratelimit_state *rs)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = evt->smmu;
> > + char title[100] = {0};
> > + char mastr[100] = {0};
> > + char addrs[100] = {0};
> > + char flags[100] = {0};
> > + char other[50] = {0};
>
> I haven't followed previous versions of this series in detail, but
> allocating 450 bytes on the stack for this seems excessive to me.
If "450B" raises a red flag, should we do something about these?
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c: In function ‘arm_smmu_atc_inv_master.isra’:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:2065:1: warning: the frame size of 1088 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c: In function ‘arm_smmu_sync_cd’:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:1218:1: warning: the frame size of 1088 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c: In function ‘__arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range’:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:2213:1: warning: the frame size of 1072 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c: In function ‘arm_smmu_atc_inv_domain’:
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:2118:1: warning: the frame size of 1120 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
Seems that struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch is too big. Any suggestion?
Thanks
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-18 18:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Parse out event records Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_event Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19 1:56 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21 6:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 13:11 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-24 14:20 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 17:02 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 17:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-24 17:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-28 12:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-28 14:46 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 17:23 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04 18:16 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 18:19 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-01 14:41 ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-01 15:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 5:25 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04 8:31 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-07 0:10 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-07 14:33 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-07 0:16 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-07 14:57 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-11 22:20 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-12 0:52 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-12 4:01 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-12 8:12 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Log better event records Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19 2:06 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-19 4:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21 6:29 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21 6:26 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21 22:53 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-24 13:15 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-24 14:14 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-29 18:53 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-29 19:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 19:00 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2024-10-29 18:49 ` Will Deacon
2024-11-01 15:05 ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-01 16:06 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 6:36 ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04 10:51 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Avoid redundant master lookup in events Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19 2:08 ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-19 1:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Parse out event records Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21 6:33 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21 22:51 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxqZX3BxaM3Uhll3@Asurada-Nvidia \
--to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=praan@google.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox