Linux IOMMU Development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Log better event records
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:51:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyinFh3HlawGt4iJ@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAE2F3rBkHX=at0a5MN2XGSpxo02ithb=23Tn9rczrbquo6fzwA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 10:36:36PM -0800, Daniel Mentz wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 11:01 AM Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Currently, the driver dumps the raw hex for a received event record.
> > Improve this by leveraging `struct arm_smmu_event` for event fields
> > and log human-readable event records with meaningful information.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  13 +++
> >  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index 2f1108e5de51..4477cf86cb8e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -83,6 +83,34 @@ static struct arm_smmu_option_prop arm_smmu_options[] = {
> >         { 0, NULL},
> >  };
> >
> > +static const char * const event_str[] = {
> 
> I'd prefer the order in which they are specified in the Arm SMMUv3 arch spec.
> 

Ack. I had this initially as I grouped the event parsing in the
following types which has changed in the new versions. I'll re-order
them as they appear in the Arm SMMUv3 spec.

> > +       /* Bad config events */
> > +       [EVT_ID_BAD_SID_CONFIG] = "C_BAD_STREAMID",
> > +       [EVT_ID_BAD_STE_CONFIG] = "C_BAD_STE",
> > +       [EVT_ID_BAD_CD_CONFIG] = "C_BAD_CD",
> > +       [EVT_ID_BAD_SSID_CONFIG] = "C_BAD_SUBSTREAMID",
> > +       [EVT_ID_STREAM_DISABLED] = "F_STREAM_DISABLED",
> > +
> > +       /* Bad translation events */
> > +       [EVT_ID_TRANSLATION_FAULT] = "F_TRANSLATION",
> > +       [EVT_ID_ADDR_SIZE_FAULT] = "F_ADDR_SIZE",
> > +       [EVT_ID_ACCESS_FAULT] = "F_ACCESS",
> > +       [EVT_ID_PERMISSION_FAULT] = "F_PERMISSION",
> > +
> > +       /* Bad fetch events */
> > +       [EVT_ID_STE_FETCH_FAULT] = "F_STE_FETCH",
> > +       [EVT_ID_CD_FETCH_FAULT] = "F_CD_FETCH",
> > +       [EVT_ID_VMS_FETCH_FAULT] = "F_VMS_FAULT",
> 
> F_VMS_FETCH not F_VMS_FAULT
> 

Ahh, yes! Thanks! I'll fix this.

> > +       [EVT_ID_MAX] = NULL,
> 
> Have you considered checking if evt->id is smaller than
> ARRAY_SIZE(event_str) rather than inflating even_str[] to contain 256
> entries?
> 

Yea.. a comparison of evt_id with array size wouldn't be correct as we
aren't listing all the events. Let's take the following example:

The `F_BAD_ATS_TREQ` has an event id of 0x05 but isn't defined above. In
this case, evt->id < ARRAY_SIZE(event_str) will be true.

The spec defines event IDs with inconsistent holes, for e.g. after 0x0b
we have 0x10, after 0x13 we have 0x20, after 0x21 we have 0x24.

Although, I agree that inflating the event_str[] to contain 256 entries
while most of them being NULL isn't good.

I think we can set the EVT_ID_MAX to 0x26 (the last spec-defined event
has an ID of 0x25). That way, we'll have 0x27 entries in the event_str
with a few holes. 

That way, if ((event_str[id] == NULL) || (id > ARRAY_SIZE(event_str))
we can print "Unknown Event". I believe that'd be better.

I'm assuming since we don't have anything in upstream for 
"Implementation-defined" events we can mark them as "UNKNOWN EVENTS"

> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const event_class_str[] = {
> > +       [0] = "CD fetch",
> > +       [1] = "Stage 1 translation table fetch",
> > +       [2] = "Input address caused fault ",
> > +       [3] = "Reserved",
> > +};
> > +
> >  static int arm_smmu_domain_finalise(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >                                     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 flags);
> >  static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_master *master);
> > @@ -1756,6 +1784,60 @@ arm_smmu_find_master(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u32 sid)
> >         return rb_entry(node, struct arm_smmu_stream, node)->master;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void arm_smmu_dump_raw_event(struct arm_smmu_event *event)
> > +{
> > +       int i;
> > +       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = event->smmu;
> > +
> > +       dev_err(smmu->dev, "event 0x%02x received: master %s:\n",
> > +               event->id, event->master_name);
> > +
> > +       for (i = 0; i < EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS; ++i)
> > +               dev_err(smmu->dev, "\t0x%016llx\n", event->raw[i]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void arm_smmu_dump_event(struct arm_smmu_event *evt, struct ratelimit_state *rs)
> > +{
> > +       struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = evt->smmu;
> > +       char title[100] = {0};
> > +       char mastr[100] = {0};
> > +       char addrs[100] = {0};
> > +       char flags[100] = {0};
> > +       char other[50] = {0};
> > +
> > +       if (!__ratelimit(rs))
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       snprintf(title, 100, "Unexpected event received: %s\n", event_str[evt->id]);
> > +       snprintf(mastr, 100, "\tmaster: %s sid: 0x%08x.0x%05x\n",
> > +                evt->master_name, evt->sid, evt->ssid);
> > +
> > +       switch (evt->id) {
> > +       case EVT_ID_TRANSLATION_FAULT:
> > +       case EVT_ID_ADDR_SIZE_FAULT:
> > +       case EVT_ID_ACCESS_FAULT:
> > +       case EVT_ID_PERMISSION_FAULT:
> > +               snprintf(addrs, 100, "\tiova = %#llx ipa = %#llx\n", evt->iova, evt->ipa);
> > +               snprintf(other, 50, "\tSTAG = %#x Stall = %#x\n", evt->stag, evt->stall);
> > +               snprintf(flags, 100, "\t%s%s%s%s%s%s\n",
> > +                        evt->privileged ? "Priv | " : "Unpriv | ",
> > +                        evt->instruction ? "Inst | " : "Data | ",
> > +                        evt->read ? "Read | " : "Write | ",
> > +                        evt->s2 ? "S2 | " : "S1 | ", event_class_str[evt->class],
> > +                        evt->ttrnw_valid ? (evt->ttrnw ? "| TTD Read" : "| TTD Write") : "");
> > +               break;
> > +
> > +       case EVT_ID_STE_FETCH_FAULT:
> > +       case EVT_ID_CD_FETCH_FAULT:
> > +       case EVT_ID_VMS_FETCH_FAULT:
> > +               snprintf(addrs, 100, "\tFetch address: %#llx\n", evt->ipa);
> > +               break;
> > +       }
> > +
> > +       dev_err(smmu->dev, "%s%s%s%s%s", title, mastr, addrs, flags, other);
> > +       arm_smmu_dump_raw_event(evt);
> > +}
> > +
> >  /* IRQ and event handlers */
> >  static int arm_smmu_handle_evt(struct arm_smmu_event *event)
> >  {
> > @@ -1819,6 +1901,8 @@ static int arm_smmu_handle_evt(struct arm_smmu_event *event)
> >  static void arm_smmu_get_event_from_raw(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> >                                         struct arm_smmu_event *event)
> >  {
> > +       struct arm_smmu_master *master;
> > +
> >         /* Pick out the good stuff */
> >         event->id = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_ID, event->raw[0]);
> >         event->sid = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_0_SID, event->raw[0]);
> > @@ -1833,12 +1917,24 @@ static void arm_smmu_get_event_from_raw(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
> >         event->class = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_CLASS, event->raw[1]);
> >         event->iova = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_2_ADDR, event->raw[2]);
> >         event->ipa = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_3_IPA, event->raw[3]);
> > +       event->ttrnw = FIELD_GET(EVTQ_1_TT_READ, event->raw[1]);
> > +       event->ttrnw_valid = false;
> >         event->smmu = smmu;
> > +       event->dev = NULL;
> > +
> > +       if (event->id == EVT_ID_PERMISSION_FAULT)
> > +               event->ttrnw_valid = (event->class == EVTQ_1_CLASS_TT);
> > +
> > +       mutex_lock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> > +       master = arm_smmu_find_master(smmu, event->sid);
> > +       if (master)
> > +               event->dev = get_device(master->dev);
> > +       mutex_unlock(&smmu->streams_mutex);
> > +       event->master_name = event->dev ? dev_name(event->dev) : "(unassigned sid)";
> >  }
> >
> >  static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
> >  {
> > -       int i, ret;
> >         struct arm_smmu_event evt;
> >         struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
> >         struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->evtq.q;
> > @@ -1850,15 +1946,10 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
> >                 while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt.raw)) {
> >
> >                         arm_smmu_get_event_from_raw(smmu, &evt);
> > -                       ret = arm_smmu_handle_evt(&evt);
> > -                       if (!ret || !__ratelimit(&rs))
> > -                               continue;
> > -
> > -                       dev_info(smmu->dev, "event 0x%02x received:\n", evt.id);
> > -                       for (i = 0; i < EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS; ++i)
> > -                               dev_info(smmu->dev, "\t0x%016llx\n",
> > -                                       (unsigned long long)evt.raw[i]);
> > +                       if (arm_smmu_handle_evt(&evt))
> > +                               arm_smmu_dump_event(&evt, &rs);
> >
> > +                       put_device(evt.dev);
> >                         cond_resched();
> >                 }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > index 8a42d7b701fb..820b08f872af 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > @@ -438,10 +438,19 @@ static inline unsigned int arm_smmu_cdtab_l2_idx(unsigned int ssid)
> >  #define EVTQ_0_ID                      GENMASK_ULL(7, 0)
> >
> >  /* Events */
> > +#define EVT_ID_BAD_SID_CONFIG          0x02
> 
> I find that EVT_ID_BAD_STREAMID_CONFIG would be more consistent with
> the spec and what's already in this header file.
> 

Ack.

> > +#define EVT_ID_STE_FETCH_FAULT         0x03
> > +#define EVT_ID_BAD_STE_CONFIG          0x04
> > +#define EVT_ID_STREAM_DISABLED         0x06
> 
> EVT_ID_STREAM_DISABLED_FAULT
> 
> > +#define EVT_ID_BAD_SSID_CONFIG         0x08
> 
> EVT_ID_BAD_SUBSTREAMID_CONFIG
> 

Ack. Will update the names.

> > +#define EVT_ID_CD_FETCH_FAULT          0x09
> > +#define EVT_ID_BAD_CD_CONFIG           0x0a
> >  #define EVT_ID_TRANSLATION_FAULT       0x10
> >  #define EVT_ID_ADDR_SIZE_FAULT         0x11
> >  #define EVT_ID_ACCESS_FAULT            0x12
> >  #define EVT_ID_PERMISSION_FAULT                0x13
> > +#define EVT_ID_VMS_FETCH_FAULT         0x25
> > +#define EVT_ID_MAX                     0xff
> >
> >  #define EVTQ_0_SSV                     (1UL << 11)
> >  #define EVTQ_0_SSID                    GENMASK_ULL(31, 12)
> > @@ -774,7 +783,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_stream {
> >  };
> >
> >  struct arm_smmu_event {
> > +       const char                      *master_name;
> >         struct arm_smmu_device          *smmu;
> > +       struct device                   *dev;
> >         u8                              id;
> >         u8                              class;
> >         u16                             stag;
> > @@ -789,6 +800,8 @@ struct arm_smmu_event {
> >         bool                            instruction;
> >         bool                            s2;
> >         bool                            read;
> > +       bool                            ttrnw;
> > +       bool                            ttrnw_valid;
> >  };
> >
> >  /* SMMU private data for each master */
> > --
> > 2.47.0.rc1.288.g06298d1525-goog
> >
> >

Thanks,
Praan

  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-04 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-18 18:00 [PATCH v4 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Parse out event records Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_event Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19  1:56   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21  6:20     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 13:11   ` Will Deacon
2024-10-24 14:20     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 17:02     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 17:03       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-24 17:37         ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-28 12:23           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-10-28 14:46             ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 17:23       ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04 18:16         ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04 18:19           ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-01 14:41   ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-01 15:08     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04  5:25       ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04  8:31         ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-07  0:10           ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-07 14:33             ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-07  0:16   ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-07 14:57     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-11 22:20       ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-12  0:52         ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-12  4:01           ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-12  8:12             ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Log better event records Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19  2:06   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-19  4:51     ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21  6:29       ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21  6:26     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21 22:53       ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-24 13:15   ` Will Deacon
2024-10-24 14:14     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-29 18:53       ` Will Deacon
2024-10-29 19:59         ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-24 19:00     ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-29 18:49       ` Will Deacon
2024-11-01 15:05   ` Robin Murphy
2024-11-01 16:06     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-11-04  6:36   ` Daniel Mentz
2024-11-04 10:51     ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2024-10-18 18:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Avoid redundant master lookup in events Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-19  2:08   ` Nicolin Chen
2024-10-19  1:45 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Parse out event records Nicolin Chen
2024-10-21  6:33   ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2024-10-21 22:51     ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZyinFh3HlawGt4iJ@google.com \
    --to=praan@google.com \
    --cc=danielmentz@google.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox