Linux Kernel Selftest development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jgg at ziepe.ca (Jason Gunthorpe)
Subject: [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr()
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:27:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604122714.GA15385@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+xy-dx4dLDLLj9dRzRNSVG9H5nDPPnjpYF38qKZNNCh_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 02:18:19PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 7:46 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at ziepe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 06:55:14PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to
> > > pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other
> > > than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
> > >
> > > ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() use provided user pointers for vma lookups (through
> > > e.g. mlx4_get_umem_mr()), which can only by done with untagged pointers.
> > >
> > > Untag user pointers in these functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl at google.com>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > index 5a3a1780ceea..f88ee733e617 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > @@ -709,6 +709,8 @@ static int ib_uverbs_reg_mr(struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> > >       if (ret)
> > >               return ret;
> > >
> > > +     cmd.start = untagged_addr(cmd.start);
> > > +
> > >       if ((cmd.start & ~PAGE_MASK) != (cmd.hca_va & ~PAGE_MASK))
> > >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I feel like we shouldn't thave to do this here, surely the cmd.start
> > should flow unmodified to get_user_pages, and gup should untag it?
> >
> > ie, this sort of direction for the IB code (this would be a giant
> > patch, so I didn't have time to write it all, but I think it is much
> > saner):
> 
> Hi Jason,
> 
> ib_uverbs_reg_mr() passes cmd.start to mlx4_get_umem_mr(), which calls
> find_vma(), which only accepts untagged addresses. Could you explain
> how your patch helps?

That mlx4 is just a 'weird duck', it is not the normal flow, and I
don't think the core code should be making special consideration for
it.

Jason

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jgg@ziepe.ca (Jason Gunthorpe)
Subject: [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr()
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 09:27:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604122714.GA15385@ziepe.ca> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190604122714.QARYxXjsYk7LkY3VseLJHaV6RN6vp3dW9I1rBkKRxrI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAeHK+xy-dx4dLDLLj9dRzRNSVG9H5nDPPnjpYF38qKZNNCh_g@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019@02:18:19PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2019@7:46 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2019@06:55:14PM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > > This patch is a part of a series that extends arm64 kernel ABI to allow to
> > > pass tagged user pointers (with the top byte set to something else other
> > > than 0x00) as syscall arguments.
> > >
> > > ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() use provided user pointers for vma lookups (through
> > > e.g. mlx4_get_umem_mr()), which can only by done with untagged pointers.
> > >
> > > Untag user pointers in these functions.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl at google.com>
> > >  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c | 4 ++++
> > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > index 5a3a1780ceea..f88ee733e617 100644
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_cmd.c
> > > @@ -709,6 +709,8 @@ static int ib_uverbs_reg_mr(struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs)
> > >       if (ret)
> > >               return ret;
> > >
> > > +     cmd.start = untagged_addr(cmd.start);
> > > +
> > >       if ((cmd.start & ~PAGE_MASK) != (cmd.hca_va & ~PAGE_MASK))
> > >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> > I feel like we shouldn't thave to do this here, surely the cmd.start
> > should flow unmodified to get_user_pages, and gup should untag it?
> >
> > ie, this sort of direction for the IB code (this would be a giant
> > patch, so I didn't have time to write it all, but I think it is much
> > saner):
> 
> Hi Jason,
> 
> ib_uverbs_reg_mr() passes cmd.start to mlx4_get_umem_mr(), which calls
> find_vma(), which only accepts untagged addresses. Could you explain
> how your patch helps?

That mlx4 is just a 'weird duck', it is not the normal flow, and I
don't think the core code should be making special consideration for
it.

Jason

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-04 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 141+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-03 16:55 [PATCH v16 00/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to the kernel andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55 ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 01/16] uaccess: add untagged_addr definition for other arches andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:02   ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 17:02     ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:06     ` andreyknvl
2019-06-03 17:06       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:24       ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 17:24         ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 17:29         ` hch
2019-06-03 17:29           ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-06-03 18:17           ` khalid.aziz
2019-06-03 18:17             ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-04 11:45             ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 11:45               ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 02/16] arm64: untag user pointers in access_ok and __uaccess_mask_ptr andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:51   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:51     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:51     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 17:53   ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 17:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 17:53     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:07     ` keescook
2019-06-10 18:07       ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:07       ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 18:53       ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 18:53         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 18:53         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 20:36         ` keescook
2019-06-10 20:36           ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 20:36           ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:57     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:09       ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-12  9:32         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:52           ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-06-11 17:09       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:39         ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:03           ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:04             ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 03/16] lib, arm64: untag user pointers in strn*_user andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:48   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:48     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:48     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:06   ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 04/16] mm: untag user pointers in do_pages_move andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:49   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:49     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:49     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 20:18   ` Khalid Aziz
2019-06-12 11:08     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 05/16] arm64: untag user pointers passed to memory syscalls andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:51   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:51     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:51     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:28   ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 14:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 15:35     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:44       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:13         ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 06/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in mm/gup.c andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:59   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:59     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:59     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 07/16] mm, arm64: untag user pointers in get_vaddr_frames andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:00   ` keescook
2019-06-08  4:00     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  4:00     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 14:29   ` catalin.marinas
2019-06-10 14:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-10 14:29     ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 08/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in copy_mount_options andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:02   ` keescook
2019-06-08  4:02     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  4:02     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-11 14:38     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:36       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 09/16] fs, arm64: untag user pointers in fs/userfaultfd.c andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  4:03   ` keescook
2019-06-08  4:03     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  4:03     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 10/16] drm/amdgpu, arm64: untag user pointers andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 11/16] drm/radeon, arm64: untag user pointers in radeon_gem_userptr_ioctl andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 12/16] IB, arm64: untag user pointers in ib_uverbs_(re)reg_mr() andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-03 17:46   ` jgg
2019-06-03 17:46     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:18     ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 12:18       ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 12:27       ` jgg [this message]
2019-06-04 12:27         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 12:45         ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 12:45           ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-04 13:02           ` jgg
2019-06-04 13:02             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-06-04 13:09             ` andreyknvl
2019-06-04 13:09               ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-12 11:01               ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 13/16] media/v4l2-core, arm64: untag user pointers in videobuf_dma_contig_user_get andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:52   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:52     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:52     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 14/16] tee, arm64: untag user pointers in tee_shm_register andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-07  5:33   ` jens.wiklander
2019-06-07  5:33     ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-07  5:33     ` Jens Wiklander
2019-06-08  4:05   ` keescook
2019-06-08  4:05     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  4:05     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 15/16] vfio/type1, arm64: untag user pointers in vaddr_get_pfn andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:58   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:58     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:58     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-12 10:38   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-03 16:55 ` [PATCH v16 16/16] selftests, arm64: add a selftest for passing tagged pointers to kernel andreyknvl
2019-06-03 16:55   ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-08  3:56   ` keescook
2019-06-08  3:56     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-08  3:56     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-10 22:08     ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08       ` shuah
2019-06-10 22:08       ` shuah
2019-06-11 15:01   ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-11 17:18     ` Andrey Konovalov
2019-06-11 17:50       ` Catalin Marinas
2019-06-12 11:14         ` Andrey Konovalov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190604122714.GA15385@ziepe.ca \
    --to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox