From: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com,
pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, dmatlack@google.com, jgg@ziepe.ca,
graf@amazon.com, pratyush@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
chrisl@kernel.org, rppt@kernel.org, skhawaja@google.com,
parav@nvidia.com, saeedm@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com,
jrhilke@google.com, david@redhat.com, jgowans@amazon.com,
dwmw2@infradead.org, epetron@amazon.de, junaids@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 15/21] PCI: Make PCI saved state and capability structs public
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 15:36:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251018223620.GD1034710.vipinsh@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPM_DUyyH1KaOerU@wunner.de>
On 2025-10-18 09:17:33, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 05:07:07PM -0700, Vipin Sharma wrote:
> > Move struct pci_saved_state{} and struct pci_cap_saved_data{} to
> > linux/pci.h so that they are available to code outside of the PCI core.
> >
> > These structs will be used in subsequent commits to serialize and
> > deserialize PCI state across Live Update.
>
> That's not sufficient as a justification to make these public in my view.
>
> There are already pci_store_saved_state() and pci_load_saved_state()
> helpers to serialize PCI state. Why do you need anything more?
> (Honest question.)
>
In LUO ecosystem, currently, we do not have a solid solution to do
proper serialization/deserialization of structs along with versioning
between different kernel versions. This work is still being discussed.
Here, I created separate structs (exactly same as the original one) to
have little bit control on what gets saved in serialized state and
correctly gets deserialized after kexec.
For example, if I am using existing structs and not creating my own
structs then I cannot just do a blind memcpy() between whole of the PCI state
prior to kexec to PCI state after the kexec. In the new kernel
layout might have changed like addition or removal of a field.
Having __packed in my version of struct, I can build validation like
hardcoded offset of members. I can add version number (not added in this
series) for checking compatbility in the struct for serialization and
deserialization. Overall, it is providing some freedom to how to pass
data to next kernel without changing or modifying the PCI state structs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-18 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-18 0:06 [RFC PATCH 00/21] VFIO live update support Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 01/21] selftests/liveupdate: Build tests from the selftests/liveupdate directory Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 02/21] selftests/liveupdate: Create library of core live update ioctls Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 03/21] selftests/liveupdate: Move do_kexec.sh script to liveupdate/lib Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 04/21] selftests/liveupdate: Move LUO ioctls calls to liveupdate library Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 05/21] vfio/pci: Register VFIO live update file handler to Live Update Orchestrator Vipin Sharma
2025-10-31 21:24 ` David Matlack
2025-10-31 22:28 ` David Matlack
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 06/21] vfio/pci: Accept live update preservation request for VFIO cdev Vipin Sharma
2025-10-27 20:44 ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-28 13:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-28 17:39 ` Jacob Pan
2025-10-29 16:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-30 23:10 ` David Matlack
2025-10-31 0:18 ` Pasha Tatashin
2025-10-31 21:41 ` David Matlack
2025-10-18 0:06 ` [RFC PATCH 07/21] vfio/pci: Store VFIO PCI device preservation data in KHO for live update Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 08/21] vfio/pci: Retrieve preserved VFIO device for Live Update Orechestrator Vipin Sharma
2025-10-31 23:12 ` David Matlack
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 09/21] vfio/pci: Add Live Update finish callback implementation Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 10/21] PCI: Add option to skip Bus Master Enable reset during kexec Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 11/21] vfio/pci: Skip clearing bus master on live update device " Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 7:09 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-18 22:19 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 12/21] vfio/pci: Skip clearing bus master on live update restored device Vipin Sharma
2025-10-20 21:29 ` David Matlack
2025-10-20 22:39 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 13/21] vfio/pci: Preserve VFIO PCI config space through live update Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 14:59 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 14/21] vfio/pci: Skip device reset on live update restored device Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 15/21] PCI: Make PCI saved state and capability structs public Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 7:17 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-18 22:36 ` Vipin Sharma [this message]
2025-10-18 23:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-20 23:49 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-22 17:45 ` David Matlack
2025-10-22 17:51 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-22 17:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-19 8:15 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-20 23:54 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-30 23:55 ` David Matlack
2025-10-31 0:06 ` David Matlack
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 16/21] vfio/pci: Save and restore the PCI state of the VFIO device Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 7:25 ` Lukas Wunner
2025-10-18 22:44 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 15:02 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 17/21] vfio/pci: Disable interrupts before going live update kexec Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 18/21] vfio: selftests: Build liveupdate library in VFIO selftests Vipin Sharma
2025-10-20 20:50 ` David Matlack
2025-10-20 23:55 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 19/21] vfio: selftests: Initialize vfio_pci_device using a VFIO cdev FD Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 20/21] vfio: selftests: Add VFIO live update test Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 0:07 ` [RFC PATCH 21/21] vfio: selftests: Validate vconfig preservation of VFIO PCI device during live update Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] VFIO live update support Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-18 22:53 ` Vipin Sharma
2025-10-18 23:06 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-20 23:30 ` Vipin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251018223620.GD1034710.vipinsh@google.com \
--to=vipinsh@google.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=epetron@amazon.de \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jgowans@amazon.com \
--cc=jrhilke@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox