From: ravi.bangoria at linux.vnet.ibm.com (Ravi Bangoria)
Subject: [PATCH v5 16/19] tracing: probeevent: Add array type support
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:18:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72be81a4-710a-b942-277d-9156c3debc5d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152049905133.7289.17516121776689315422.stgit@devbox>
Hi Masami,
On 03/08/2018 02:20 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Add array type support for probe events.
> This allows user to get arraied types from memory address.
> The array type syntax is
>
> TYPE[N]
>
> Where TYPE is one of types (u8/16/32/64,s8/16/32/64,
> x8/16/32/64, symbol, string) and N is a fixed value less
> than 64.
>
> The string array type is a bit different from other types. For
> other base types, <base-type>[1] is equal to <base-type>
> (e.g. +0(%di):x32[1] is same as +0(%di):x32.) But string[1] is not
> equal to string. The string type itself represents "char array",
> but string array type represents "char * array". So, for example,
> +0(%di):string[1] is equal to +0(+0(%di)):string.
I was trying to test this patch. But I'm not getting proper data.
Here is what I'm doing...
$ cat hello.c
#include <stdio.h>
void foo1(int a[])
{
printf("%d\n", a[2]);
}
void foo(int a[])
{
printf("%d\n", a[1]);
foo1(a);
}
void main()
{
int a[3] = {4, 5, 6};
printf("%d\n", a[0]);
foo(a);
}
$ gcc -g hello.c -o hello
$ sudo ./perf probe -x ~/hello foo1 'a=a:x32[3]'
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
p:probe_hello/foo1 /home/ravi/hello:0x00000000000005fc a=+96(%gpr31):x32[3]
$ sudo ./perf record -e probe_hello:foo1 ~/hello
$ sudo ./perf script
hello 6913 [038] 2857.704470: probe_hello:foo1: (100005fc) a={0xd69e4400,0x7fff,0x0}
I don't see proper values of the 'a'? Anything wrong with my perf commands :) ?
Thanks,
Ravi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Ravi Bangoria)
Subject: [PATCH v5 16/19] tracing: probeevent: Add array type support
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 11:18:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <72be81a4-710a-b942-277d-9156c3debc5d@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180315054819.w1atKl989jFNj8qPAwM_GzCV-UjK3M1iV2Ou_57qCZY@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <152049905133.7289.17516121776689315422.stgit@devbox>
Hi Masami,
On 03/08/2018 02:20 PM, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Add array type support for probe events.
> This allows user to get arraied types from memory address.
> The array type syntax is
>
> TYPE[N]
>
> Where TYPE is one of types (u8/16/32/64,s8/16/32/64,
> x8/16/32/64, symbol, string) and N is a fixed value less
> than 64.
>
> The string array type is a bit different from other types. For
> other base types, <base-type>[1] is equal to <base-type>
> (e.g. +0(%di):x32[1] is same as +0(%di):x32.) But string[1] is not
> equal to string. The string type itself represents "char array",
> but string array type represents "char * array". So, for example,
> +0(%di):string[1] is equal to +0(+0(%di)):string.
I was trying to test this patch. But I'm not getting proper data.
Here is what I'm doing...
$ cat hello.c
#include <stdio.h>
void foo1(int a[])
{
printf("%d\n", a[2]);
}
void foo(int a[])
{
printf("%d\n", a[1]);
foo1(a);
}
void main()
{
int a[3] = {4, 5, 6};
printf("%d\n", a[0]);
foo(a);
}
$ gcc -g hello.c -o hello
$ sudo ./perf probe -x ~/hello foo1 'a=a:x32[3]'
$ sudo cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
p:probe_hello/foo1 /home/ravi/hello:0x00000000000005fc a=+96(%gpr31):x32[3]
$ sudo ./perf record -e probe_hello:foo1 ~/hello
$ sudo ./perf script
hello 6913 [038] 2857.704470: probe_hello:foo1: (100005fc) a={0xd69e4400,0x7fff,0x0}
I don't see proper values of the 'a'? Anything wrong with my perf commands :) ?
Thanks,
Ravi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-15 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-08 8:43 [PATCH v5 00/19] tracing: probeevent: Improve fetcharg features mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:43 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v5 01/19] [BUGFIX] tracing: probeevent: Fix to support minus offset from symbol mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:44 ` [PATCH v5 02/19] selftests: ftrace: Add probe event argument syntax testcase mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:44 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/19] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for string type with kprobe_event mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/19] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for probepoint mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:45 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:46 ` [PATCH v5 05/19] tracing: probeevent: Cleanup print argument functions mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:46 ` [PATCH v5 06/19] tracing: probeevent: Cleanup argument field definition mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:46 ` [PATCH v5 07/19] tracing: probeevent: Remove NOKPROBE_SYMBOL from print functions mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:46 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:47 ` [PATCH v5 08/19] tracing: probeevent: Introduce new argument fetching code mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:47 ` [PATCH v5 09/19] tracing: probeevent: Unify fetch type tables mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:47 ` [PATCH v5 10/19] tracing: probeevent: Return consumed bytes of dynamic area mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:47 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 11/19] tracing: probeevent: Append traceprobe_ for exported function mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:48 ` [PATCH v5 12/19] tracing: probeevent: Unify fetch_insn processing common part mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:49 ` [PATCH v5 13/19] tracing: probeevent: Add symbol type mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:49 ` [PATCH v5 14/19] x86: ptrace: Add function argument access API mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:50 ` [PATCH v5 15/19] tracing: probeevent: Add $argN for accessing function args mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:50 ` [PATCH v5 16/19] tracing: probeevent: Add array type support mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:50 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-15 5:48 ` ravi.bangoria [this message]
2018-03-15 5:48 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-03-15 7:18 ` mhiramat
2018-03-15 7:18 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-15 7:23 ` mhiramat
2018-03-15 7:23 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-15 8:01 ` ravi.bangoria
2018-03-15 8:01 ` Ravi Bangoria
2018-03-16 14:48 ` mhiramat
2018-03-16 14:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:51 ` [PATCH v5 17/19] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for symbol type mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:51 ` [PATCH v5 18/19] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for $argN with kprobe_event mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-03-08 8:52 ` [PATCH v5 19/19] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for array type " mhiramat
2018-03-08 8:52 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=72be81a4-710a-b942-277d-9156c3debc5d@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox