* [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
@ 2004-03-25 21:23 Brad Vrabete
2004-03-25 23:17 ` Goetz Bock
2004-03-26 16:13 ` Delian Krustev
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Brad Vrabete @ 2004-03-25 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 112 bytes --]
Hi,
Is there any was to create a logigal volume larger than 2TB? Can LVM2 do that?
Thanks,
Brad Vrabete
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 697 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-03-25 21:23 [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit Brad Vrabete
@ 2004-03-25 23:17 ` Goetz Bock
2004-03-26 16:13 ` Delian Krustev
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Goetz Bock @ 2004-03-25 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On Thu, Mar 25 '04 at 16:23, Brad Vrabete wrote:
> Is there any was to create a logigal volume larger than 2TB? Can LVM2
> do that?
you need to use 2.6.x (or find a patch for 2.4.x) as onty his kernel
supports large block devices.
Or you might have luck with x86_64 (aka AMD Opterons)
--
/"\ Goetz Bock at blacknet dot de -- secure mobile Linux everNETting
\ / (c) 2003 as GNU FDL 1.1
X [ 1. Use descriptive subjects - 2. Edit a reply for brevity - ]
/ \ [ 3. Reply to the list - 4. Read the archive *before* you post ]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-03-25 21:23 [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit Brad Vrabete
2004-03-25 23:17 ` Goetz Bock
@ 2004-03-26 16:13 ` Delian Krustev
2004-03-26 16:16 ` AJ Lewis
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Delian Krustev @ 2004-03-26 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On Thursday 25 March 2004 23:23, Brad Vrabete wrote:
> Is there any was to create a logigal volume larger than 2TB? Can LVM2 do
> that?
I think it can. However tha maximum size for a block device in 2.4 kernels
is 2TB. You should try 2.6, and use large enough PE size.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-03-26 16:13 ` Delian Krustev
@ 2004-03-26 16:16 ` AJ Lewis
2004-05-12 21:32 ` Alasdair G Kergon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: AJ Lewis @ 2004-03-26 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1136 bytes --]
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 06:13:50PM +0200, Delian Krustev wrote:
> On Thursday 25 March 2004 23:23, Brad Vrabete wrote:
>
> > Is there any was to create a logigal volume larger than 2TB? Can LVM2 do
> > that?
>
> I think it can. However tha maximum size for a block device in 2.4 kernels
> is 2TB. You should try 2.6, and use large enough PE size.
The PE size limitation isn't present in lvm2 (The version of lvm that works
in 2.6) if you use the native lvm2 format. So you should be able to create
larger than 2TB LVs with LVM2. Just FYI.
--
AJ Lewis Voice: 612-638-0500
Red Hat Inc. E-Mail: alewis@redhat.com
720 Washington Ave. SE, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55414
Current GPG fingerprint = FE77 4B43 6A9B F982 A731 02FA 2BF5 7574 294A AA5A
Grab the key at: http://people.redhat.com/alewis/gpg.html or one of the
many keyservers out there...
-----Begin Obligatory Humorous Quote----------------------------------------
File not found. Should I fake it? (Y/N)
-----End Obligatory Humorous Quote------------------------------------------
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-03-26 16:16 ` AJ Lewis
@ 2004-05-12 21:32 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-09-02 20:15 ` P. Larry Nelson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alasdair G Kergon @ 2004-05-12 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:16:44AM -0600, AJ Lewis wrote:
> The PE size limitation isn't present in lvm2 (The version of lvm that works
> in 2.6) if you use the native lvm2 format. So you should be able to create
> larger than 2TB LVs with LVM2. Just FYI.
As those of you monitoring the lvm-cvs mailing list may have noticed,
I've added code to the LVM2 CVS tree to help people simulate large devices
for testing purposes on 2.6 kernels with the latest -udm patches.
lvcreate --type zero -L16T vg # Create 16TB 'zero' device
lvcreate -s vg/lvol0 -L1G # Create snapshot of it
Then use the snapshot as a 'sparse' device, in the example, supporting
upto 1GB of actual data.
[At some point I'll merge it into a one-line command with --type sparse]
NB There's been a lot of change in CVS recently (and more to come)
so I expect some new bugs to show up along with the new features:-(
Alasdair
--
agk@redhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-05-12 21:32 ` Alasdair G Kergon
@ 2004-09-02 20:15 ` P. Larry Nelson
2004-09-03 20:01 ` Peter Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: P. Larry Nelson @ 2004-09-02 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development; +Cc: agk
On 5/12/2004 4:32 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:16:44AM -0600, AJ Lewis wrote:
>
>>The PE size limitation isn't present in lvm2 (The version of lvm that works
>>in 2.6) if you use the native lvm2 format. So you should be able to create
>>larger than 2TB LVs with LVM2. Just FYI.
>
>
> As those of you monitoring the lvm-cvs mailing list may have noticed,
> I've added code to the LVM2 CVS tree to help people simulate large devices
> for testing purposes on 2.6 kernels with the latest -udm patches.
>
> lvcreate --type zero -L16T vg # Create 16TB 'zero' device
> lvcreate -s vg/lvol0 -L1G # Create snapshot of it
>
> Then use the snapshot as a 'sparse' device, in the example, supporting
> upto 1GB of actual data.
>
> [At some point I'll merge it into a one-line command with --type sparse]
>
> NB There's been a lot of change in CVS recently (and more to come)
> so I expect some new bugs to show up along with the new features:-(
>
> Alasdair
Being confined to running RedHat and using their updates and RPMs,
I'm running stock RHEL-ES3 file servers with latest RH kernel of
2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and lvm-1.0.3-15. I'm led to understand that
the ES3 kernel has portions of the 2.6 kernel in it, but I don't
think it has the portion that can handle >2TB file systems.
I have had a need to go to >2TB file systems for some time and am
sort of limping along by stringing together many 2TB file systems.
Can anyone (perhaps our list contributor from RedHat?) tell me when
I can expect a kernel and lvm from RedHat that will allow me to go
beyond the 2TB limit?
Thanks!
- Larry
--
P. Larry Nelson (217-244-9855) | Systems/Network Administrator
461 Loomis Lab | U of I, CITES Departmental Services
1110 W. Green St., Urbana, IL | Consultant to: High Energy Physics Group
MailTo:lnelson@uiuc.edu | http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/lnelson
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Information without accountability is just noise." - P.L. Nelson
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit
2004-09-02 20:15 ` P. Larry Nelson
@ 2004-09-03 20:01 ` Peter Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peter Smith @ 2004-09-03 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2132 bytes --]
P. Larry Nelson wrote:
> On 5/12/2004 4:32 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:16:44AM -0600, AJ Lewis wrote:
>>
>>> The PE size limitation isn't present in lvm2 (The version of lvm
>>> that works
>>> in 2.6) if you use the native lvm2 format. So you should be able to
>>> create
>>> larger than 2TB LVs with LVM2. Just FYI.
>>
>>
>>
>> As those of you monitoring the lvm-cvs mailing list may have noticed,
>> I've added code to the LVM2 CVS tree to help people simulate large
>> devices
>> for testing purposes on 2.6 kernels with the latest -udm patches.
>>
>> lvcreate --type zero -L16T vg # Create 16TB 'zero' device
>> lvcreate -s vg/lvol0 -L1G # Create snapshot of it
>>
>> Then use the snapshot as a 'sparse' device, in the example, supporting
>> upto 1GB of actual data.
>>
>> [At some point I'll merge it into a one-line command with --type sparse]
>>
>> NB There's been a lot of change in CVS recently (and more to come)
>> so I expect some new bugs to show up along with the new features:-(
>>
>> Alasdair
>
>
> Being confined to running RedHat and using their updates and RPMs,
> I'm running stock RHEL-ES3 file servers with latest RH kernel of
> 2.4.21-15.0.4.ELsmp and lvm-1.0.3-15. I'm led to understand that
> the ES3 kernel has portions of the 2.6 kernel in it, but I don't
> think it has the portion that can handle >2TB file systems.
>
> I have had a need to go to >2TB file systems for some time and am
> sort of limping along by stringing together many 2TB file systems.
>
> Can anyone (perhaps our list contributor from RedHat?) tell me when
> I can expect a kernel and lvm from RedHat that will allow me to go
> beyond the 2TB limit?
>
> Thanks!
> - Larry
I happened to look into this over the past few months. Redhat
Enterprise Linux v3 does NOT have any support for >2TB _anything_.
Redhat has told me that >2TB support, which would mean kernel v2.6 (and
probably LVM2) will only be available when Enterprise v4 comes out.
Also, v4 is scheduled to be out in probably about 10 more months now,
maybe less (at the time it was 13-15 months).
HTH
Peter
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-03 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-03-25 21:23 [linux-lvm] 2 TB limit Brad Vrabete
2004-03-25 23:17 ` Goetz Bock
2004-03-26 16:13 ` Delian Krustev
2004-03-26 16:16 ` AJ Lewis
2004-05-12 21:32 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2004-09-02 20:15 ` P. Larry Nelson
2004-09-03 20:01 ` Peter Smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox