From: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <miquels@cistron.nl>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
thornber@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests)
Date: Thu Feb 19 20:52:02 2004 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40355F03.9030207@cyberone.com.au>
Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi Miquel,
> Can you see if this patch helps you?
>
This patch isn't actually so good because it doesn't wake
a specific process when it gets below it's limit...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-20 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-16 9:11 [linux-lvm] IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-16 8:30 ` [linux-lvm] " Jens Axboe
2004-02-16 9:01 ` Joe Thornber
2004-02-16 19:32 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-17 1:46 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-02-18 10:29 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 8:51 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 8:50 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 9:08 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 9:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 10:23 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 10:26 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-19 15:58 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 17:52 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 18:52 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 19:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 20:16 ` [linux-lvm] [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests) Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 20:25 ` [linux-lvm] " Andrew Morton
2004-02-19 20:40 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 21:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-23 8:41 ` [linux-lvm] [PATCH] bdi_congestion_funp (was: Re: [PATCH] per process request limits (was Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests)) Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-20 9:56 ` [linux-lvm] " Joe Thornber
2004-02-20 9:59 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-23 8:45 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-22 14:55 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-20 9:57 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-24 12:54 ` [linux-lvm] Queue congestion: passing down vs passing up [PATCH] Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 20:52 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2004-02-19 9:11 ` [linux-lvm] Re: IO scheduler, queue depth, nr_requests Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 10:26 ` Jens Axboe
2004-02-19 8:51 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-19 9:00 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2004-02-19 9:00 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403566CA.8010907@cyberone.com.au \
--to=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
--cc=miquels@cistron.nl \
--cc=thornber@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox