From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@snapgear.com>
To: "Ezequiel García" <elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@uclinux.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] m68k: fix compiler warning by properly inlining flat_set_persistent()
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:13:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F960C58.3040006@snapgear.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALF0-+UhCZZ+cpA88Mi1rz5QzecCxvwi6oZNNW7jmHJu7T6jsg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ezequiel,
On 24/04/12 08:43, Ezequiel García wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 6:07 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 15:50, Ezequiel Garcia<elezegarcia@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia<elezegarcia@gmail.com>
Normally this signed-off-by goes after your patch description
(Documentation/SubmittingPatches section 12).
>>> ---
>>> To define or to inline that is the question:
>>> The current definition of flat_set_persistent produces a compiler
>>> warning; arch/sh/ does it in a different way defining it to
>>> a macro that uses persistent var. IMHO, an inline is easier to read.
>>
>> What's the compiler warning?
>> It seems several other nommu arches use the same definition for
>> flat_set_persistent()?
>>
>
> Here's the warning:
> fs/binfmt_flat.c: In function æload_flat_fileÆ:
> fs/binfmt_flat.c:752: warning: unused variable æpersistentÆ
I like to see the actual compiler messages in the git message
description as well.
> Yes, every arch except sh is using the same definition.
> My first thought was to extend the arch/sh definition:
>
> #define flat_set_persistent(relval, p) ({ (void)p; 0; })
>
> but in a conversation in the janitors list I was told that inlining
> to a return-only function is a common pattern.
> Plus, if you compare fs/built-in.o there is no extra code generated:
>
> $ size fs-built-in-flat-inline
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 233332 1908 1640 236880 39d50 built-in-flat-inline
> $ size fs/built-in.o
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 233332 1908 1640 236880 39d50 fs/built-in.o
>
> FWIW, this is my compiler, I built it using gentoo's crossdev tool.
> gcc version 4.4.5 (Gentoo 4.4.5 p1.3, pie-0.4.5)
>
> So, what's your opinion?
I see the same warning on my gcc-4.5.1 based toolchain as well.
No surprise really given none of the m68k macros use the persistent arg.
If you want to move that signed-off-by and put the warning text in
the message description I will carry this in the m68knommu git tree.
Thanks
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-24 2:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-23 13:50 [RFC/PATCH] m68k: fix compiler warning by properly inlining flat_set_persistent() Ezequiel Garcia
2012-04-23 21:07 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-04-23 22:43 ` Ezequiel García
2012-04-24 2:13 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2012-04-24 2:35 ` Ezequiel García
2012-04-24 3:10 ` Greg Ungerer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-04-23 14:11 Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F960C58.3040006@snapgear.com \
--to=gerg@snapgear.com \
--cc=elezegarcia@gmail.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=uclinux-dev@uclinux.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox