From: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, gerg@linux-m68k.org,
linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] arch/m68k: Add CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_MULDIV32
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 14:01:05 +1000 (AEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1605131400460.7564@nippy.intranet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160513023932.16877.qmail@ns.horizon.com>
On Fri, 12 May 2016, George Spelvin wrote:
> Finn Thain wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 May 2016, George Spelvin wrote:
> >> +# Old GCC versions fall back to -m5200 compilation, generating these calls
> >> +# even though the CPU doesn't actually need it. See arch/m68k/Makefile.
> >
> > The comment is vague. Does anyone know which GCC versions do or don't
> > work like this?
>
> Yes, I looked it up in the archived GCC documentation.
Thanks.
> My current patch says:
>
> (commit comment)
> Since the compiler version is not known at Kconfig time, this cannot
> be expressed in a CONFIG_ variable, but instead is handled by some
> Makefile hackery. This only applies to GCC 4.2.4 and earlier, which
> is hopefully almost everyone, but Documentation/Changes says GCC
> 3.2.
I think you meant to write, "This does not apply to GCC 4.3 or later",
as that's what you put in the new comment below.
>
> (arch/m68k/lib/Makefile)
> +# GCC 4.2.4 and earlier don't know about ColdFire models that support
> +# DIV.L and fall back to -m5200, generating these calls even though the
> +# CPU doesn't actually need it. Not needed on GCC 4.3 or later.
> +# See the $(call cc-option ...) lines in arch/m68k/Makefile.
--
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-13 4:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-11 10:25 [RFC PATCH 2/2] arch/m68k: Add CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_MULDIV32 George Spelvin
2016-05-12 12:55 ` Greg Ungerer
2016-05-12 20:31 ` George Spelvin
2016-05-13 1:02 ` Greg Ungerer
2016-05-13 3:28 ` Finn Thain
2016-05-13 2:39 ` George Spelvin
2016-05-13 4:01 ` Finn Thain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1605131400460.7564@nippy.intranet \
--to=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=gerg@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox