* Re: [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation
[not found] <20261009143656.4884-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
@ 2026-10-09 19:27 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2026-10-09 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Günther Noack; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, linux-man
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1255 bytes --]
Hi Günther,
> Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200
> From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
>
> Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require
> CAP_MKNOD since linux.git a3c751a50fe6 (2020-05-14; "vfs: allow
> unprivileged whiteout creation").
Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct.
Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
(I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but
I will take it eventually.)
> Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
You forgot to CC the list. :)
Have a lovely night!
Alex
> ---
> man/man2/rename.2 | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/man/man2/rename.2 b/man/man2/rename.2
> index 14be6b20d3c9..7e5c02797230 100644
> --- a/man/man2/rename.2
> +++ b/man/man2/rename.2
> @@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code,
> as of Linux 4.19, at least.)
> .IP
> .B RENAME_WHITEOUT
> -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the
> -.B CAP_MKNOD
> -capability).
> -.IP
> -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT
> can't be employed together with
> .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE .
> .IP
> --
> 2.56.0
>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation
2026-10-09 19:27 ` [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation Alejandro Colomar
@ 2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2026-11-07 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Günther Noack; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, linux-man
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1549 bytes --]
Hi,
> Date: 2026-10-09 21:27:05+0200
> From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
>
> Hi Günther,
>
> > Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200
> > From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
> >
> > Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require
> > CAP_MKNOD since linux.git a3c751a50fe6 (2020-05-14; "vfs: allow
> > unprivileged whiteout creation").
>
> Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct.
>
> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>
>
> (I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but
> I will take it eventually.)
I've applied the patch. Thanks!
Cheers,
Alex
>
> > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com>
>
> You forgot to CC the list. :)
>
>
> Have a lovely night!
> Alex
>
>
> > ---
> > man/man2/rename.2 | 5 -----
> > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/man/man2/rename.2 b/man/man2/rename.2
> > index 14be6b20d3c9..7e5c02797230 100644
> > --- a/man/man2/rename.2
> > +++ b/man/man2/rename.2
> > @@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code,
> > as of Linux 4.19, at least.)
> > .IP
> > .B RENAME_WHITEOUT
> > -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the
> > -.B CAP_MKNOD
> > -capability).
> > -.IP
> > -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT
> > can't be employed together with
> > .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE .
> > .IP
> > --
> > 2.56.0
> >
>
> --
> <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20261009143656.4884-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
2026-10-09 19:27 ` [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox