* Re: [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation [not found] <20261009143656.4884-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com> @ 2026-10-09 19:27 ` Alejandro Colomar 2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2026-10-09 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Günther Noack; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, linux-man [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1255 bytes --] Hi Günther, > Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200 > From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com> > > Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require > CAP_MKNOD since linux.git a3c751a50fe6 (2020-05-14; "vfs: allow > unprivileged whiteout creation"). Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct. Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> (I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but I will take it eventually.) > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com> You forgot to CC the list. :) Have a lovely night! Alex > --- > man/man2/rename.2 | 5 ----- > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/man/man2/rename.2 b/man/man2/rename.2 > index 14be6b20d3c9..7e5c02797230 100644 > --- a/man/man2/rename.2 > +++ b/man/man2/rename.2 > @@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code, > as of Linux 4.19, at least.) > .IP > .B RENAME_WHITEOUT > -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the > -.B CAP_MKNOD > -capability). > -.IP > -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT > can't be employed together with > .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE . > .IP > -- > 2.56.0 > -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation 2026-10-09 19:27 ` [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation Alejandro Colomar @ 2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Alejandro Colomar @ 2026-11-07 12:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Günther Noack; +Cc: Miklos Szeredi, linux-man [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1549 bytes --] Hi, > Date: 2026-10-09 21:27:05+0200 > From: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> > > Hi Günther, > > > Date: 2026-10-09 16:36:56+0200 > > From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com> > > > > Whiteout objects do not count as device files and do not require > > CAP_MKNOD since linux.git a3c751a50fe6 (2020-05-14; "vfs: allow > > unprivileged whiteout creation"). > > Thanks! I checked the referenced commit, and it seems correct. > > Reviewed-by: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org> > > (I'm not taking the patch yet, in case Miklos wants to comment, but > I will take it eventually.) I've applied the patch. Thanks! Cheers, Alex > > > Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@gmail.com> > > You forgot to CC the list. :) > > > Have a lovely night! > Alex > > > > --- > > man/man2/rename.2 | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/man/man2/rename.2 b/man/man2/rename.2 > > index 14be6b20d3c9..7e5c02797230 100644 > > --- a/man/man2/rename.2 > > +++ b/man/man2/rename.2 > > @@ -250,11 +250,6 @@ is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code, > > as of Linux 4.19, at least.) > > .IP > > .B RENAME_WHITEOUT > > -requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the > > -.B CAP_MKNOD > > -capability). > > -.IP > > -.B RENAME_WHITEOUT > > can't be employed together with > > .BR RENAME_EXCHANGE . > > .IP > > -- > > 2.56.0 > > > > -- > <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es> [-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20261009143656.4884-1-gnoack3000@gmail.com>
2026-10-09 19:27 ` [PATCH] man/man2/rename.2: Remove CAP_MKNOD remark about whiteout creation Alejandro Colomar
2026-11-07 12:23 ` Alejandro Colomar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox