From: Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@gmail.com>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] media: imx: lift CSI width alignment restriction
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 09:45:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e3fee34-e8ad-7acf-97d7-f7e845ca28bb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1541775017.4112.45.camel@pengutronix.de>
On 11/9/18 6:50 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 21:46 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
>> On 11/5/18 7:20 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>>> The CSI subdevice shouldn't have to care about IDMAC line start
>>> address alignment. With compose rectangle support in the capture
>>> driver, it doesn't have to anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-capture.c | 9 ++++-----
>>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-csi.c | 2 +-
>>> drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-utils.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-capture.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-capture.c
>>> index 2d49d9573056..f87d6e8019e5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-capture.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-capture.c
>>> @@ -204,10 +204,9 @@ static int capture_g_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int __capture_try_fmt_vid_cap(struct capture_priv *priv,
>>> - struct v4l2_subev_format *fmt_src,
>>> + struct v4l2_subdev_format *fmt_src,
>>> struct v4l2_format *f)
>>> {
>>> - struct capture_priv *priv = video_drvdata(file);
>>> const struct imx_media_pixfmt *cc, *cc_src;
>>>
>>> cc_src = imx_media_find_ipu_format(fmt_src->format.code, CS_SEL_ANY);
>>> @@ -250,7 +249,7 @@ static int capture_try_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> if (ret)
>>> return ret;
>>>
>>> - return __capture_try_fmt(priv, &fmt_src, f);
>>> + return __capture_try_fmt_vid_cap(priv, &fmt_src, f);
>>> }
>>>
>>> static int capture_s_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> @@ -280,8 +279,8 @@ static int capture_s_fmt_vid_cap(struct file *file, void *fh,
>>> CS_SEL_ANY, true);
>>> priv->vdev.compose.left = 0;
>>> priv->vdev.compose.top = 0;
>>> - priv->vdev.compose.width = fmt_src.width;
>>> - priv->vdev.compose.height = fmt_src.height;
>>> + priv->vdev.compose.width = fmt_src.format.width;
>>> + priv->vdev.compose.height = fmt_src.format.height;
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-csi.c b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-csi.c
>>> index c4523afe7b48..d39682192a67 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-csi.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/media/imx/imx-media-csi.c
>>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>>> #define MIN_H 144
>>> #define MAX_W 4096
>>> #define MAX_H 4096
>>> -#define W_ALIGN 4 /* multiple of 16 pixels */
>>> +#define W_ALIGN 1 /* multiple of 2 pixels */
>>
>> This works for the IDMAC output pad because the channel's cpmem width
>> and stride can be rounded up, but width align at the CSI sink still
>> needs to be 8 pixels when directed to the IC via the CSI_SRC_PAD_DIRECT
>> pad, in order to support the 8x8 block rotator in the IC PRP, and
>> there's no way AFAIK to do the same trick of rounding up width and
>> stride for non-IDMAC direct paths through the IPU.
> Actually, this is not necessary at all. csi_try_crop takes care of this
> by setting:
> crop->width &= ~0x7;
> Which is then used to set compose rectangle and source pad formats.
Ah you are right, I had forgotten about that line.
>
> So this should be relaxed as well, if the SRC_DIRECT pad is not enabled.
Agreed, crop->width align can be relaxed but only if SRC_DIRECT pad
not enabled.
> And further, I think there is no reason to align crop->left to multiples
> of 4 pixels?
Honestly, I don't know the reason for that either. Along with crop->top
this defines the CSI active image frame position (HSC/VSC fields in
IPU_CSI_OUT_FRM_CTRL register), and I don't see any h/w restrictions on
HSC in the ref manual. I do remember that this alignment exists in
FSL/NXP BSP's though, so maybe it is an undocumented restriction.
Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-10 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-05 15:20 [PATCH 1/3] media: imx: add capture compose rectangle Philipp Zabel
2018-11-05 15:20 ` [PATCH 2/3] media: imx: set compose rectangle to mbus format Philipp Zabel
2018-11-09 5:33 ` Steve Longerbeam
2018-11-09 13:09 ` Philipp Zabel
2018-11-05 15:20 ` [PATCH 3/3] media: imx: lift CSI width alignment restriction Philipp Zabel
2018-11-09 5:46 ` Steve Longerbeam
2018-11-09 13:30 ` Philipp Zabel
2018-11-09 14:50 ` Philipp Zabel
2018-11-09 17:45 ` Steve Longerbeam [this message]
2018-11-06 14:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] media: imx: add capture compose rectangle Sakari Ailus
2018-11-06 14:44 ` Philipp Zabel
2018-11-07 11:45 ` Sakari Ailus
2018-11-09 5:33 ` Steve Longerbeam
2018-11-09 13:00 ` Philipp Zabel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e3fee34-e8ad-7acf-97d7-f7e845ca28bb@gmail.com \
--to=slongerbeam@gmail.com \
--cc=hans.verkuil@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox