From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] media: Add MIPI CCI register access helper functions
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:27:25 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230608102725.GN5058@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b558aac9-0a34-ecca-57b0-d132af8cdefb@redhat.com>
Hi Hans,
On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 09:01:40PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 6/7/23 20:18, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >> The CSI2 specification specifies a standard method to access camera sensor
> >> registers called "Camera Control Interface (CCI)".
> >>
> >> This uses either 8 or 16 bit (big-endian wire order) register addresses
> >> and supports 8, 16, 24 or 32 bit (big-endian wire order) register widths.
> >
> > I think there are some sensors that also have 64-bit registers, but we
> > can deal with that later.
> >
> >> Currently a lot of Linux camera sensor drivers all have their own custom
> >> helpers for this, often copy and pasted from other drivers.
> >>
> >> Add a set of generic helpers for this so that all sensor drivers can
> >> switch to a single common implementation.
> >>
> >> These helpers take an extra optional "int *err" function parameter,
> >> this can be used to chain a bunch of register accesses together with
> >> only a single error check at the end, rather then needing to error
> >> check each individual register access. The first failing call will
> >> set the contents of err to a non 0 value and all other calls will
> >> then become no-ops.
> >>
> >> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-media/59aefa7f-7bf9-6736-6040-39551329cd0a@redhat.com/
> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-cci.rst | 5 +
> >> Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-core.rst | 1 +
> >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig | 5 +
> >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-cci.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> include/media/v4l2-cci.h | 109 ++++++++++++++
> >> 6 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-cci.rst
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-cci.c
> >> create mode 100644 include/media/v4l2-cci.h
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-cci.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-cci.rst
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..dd297a40ed20
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-cci.rst
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> >> +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +
> >> +V4L2 CCI kAPI
> >> +^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >> +.. kernel-doc:: include/media/v4l2-cci.h
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-core.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-core.rst
> >> index 1a8c4a5f256b..239045ecc8f4 100644
> >> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-core.rst
> >> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/media/v4l2-core.rst
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Video4Linux devices
> >> v4l2-mem2mem
> >> v4l2-async
> >> v4l2-fwnode
> >> + v4l2-cci
> >> v4l2-rect
> >> v4l2-tuner
> >> v4l2-common
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> >> index 348559bc2468..523ba243261d 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Kconfig
> >> @@ -74,6 +74,11 @@ config V4L2_FWNODE
> >> config V4L2_ASYNC
> >> tristate
> >>
> >> +config V4L2_CCI
> >> + tristate
> >> + depends on I2C
> >> + select REGMAP_I2C
> >> +
> >> # Used by drivers that need Videobuf modules
> >> config VIDEOBUF_GEN
> >> tristate
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Makefile b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Makefile
> >> index 41d91bd10cf2..be2551705755 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/Makefile
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ videodev-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_V4L2_I2C) += v4l2-i2c.o
> >> # (e. g. LC_ALL=C sort Makefile)
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_V4L2_ASYNC) += v4l2-async.o
> >> +obj-$(CONFIG_V4L2_CCI) += v4l2-cci.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_V4L2_FLASH_LED_CLASS) += v4l2-flash-led-class.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_V4L2_FWNODE) += v4l2-fwnode.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_V4L2_H264) += v4l2-h264.o
> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-cci.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-cci.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..21207d137dbe
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-cci.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@
> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> +/*
> >> + * MIPI Camera Control Interface (CCI) register access helpers.
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >> +#include <linux/dev_printk.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >> +
> >> +#include <media/v4l2-cci.h>
> >> +
> >> +int cci_read(struct regmap *map, u32 reg, u32 *val, int *err)
> >> +{
> >> + int i, len, ret;
> >> + u8 buf[4];
> >> +
> >> + if (err && *err)
> >> + return *err;
> >> +
> >> + /* Set len to register width in bytes */
> >> + len = ((reg & CCI_REG_WIDTH_MASK) >> CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) + 1;
> >> + reg &= CCI_REG_ADDR_MASK;
> >> +
> >> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(map, reg, buf, len);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(regmap_get_device(map), "Error reading reg 0x%4x: %d\n", reg, ret);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + *err = ret;
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + *val = 0;
> >> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >> + *val <<= 8;
> >> + *val |= buf[i];
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cci_read);
> >> +
> >> +int cci_write(struct regmap *map, u32 reg, u32 val, int *err)
> >> +{
> >> + int i, len, ret;
> >> + u8 buf[4];
> >> +
> >> + if (err && *err)
> >> + return *err;
> >> +
> >> + /* Set len to register width in bytes */
> >> + len = ((reg & CCI_REG_WIDTH_MASK) >> CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) + 1;
> >> + reg &= CCI_REG_ADDR_MASK;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >> + buf[len - i - 1] = val & 0xff;
> >> + val >>= 8;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = regmap_bulk_write(map, reg, buf, len);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(regmap_get_device(map), "Error writing reg 0x%4x: %d\n", reg, ret);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + *err = ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cci_write);
> >> +
> >> +int cci_update_bits(struct regmap *map, u32 reg, u32 mask, u32 val, int *err)
> >> +{
> >> + int width, ret;
> >> + u32 readval;
> >> +
> >> + if (err && *err)
> >> + return *err;
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * For single byte updates use regmap_update_bits(), this uses
> >> + * the regmap-lock to protect against other read-modify-writes racing.
> >> + */
> >> + width = (reg & CCI_REG_WIDTH_MASK) >> CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT;
> >> + if (width == cci_reg_8) {
> >> + reg &= CCI_REG_ADDR_MASK;
> >> + ret = regmap_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val);
> >> + if (ret) {
> >> + dev_err(regmap_get_device(map), "Error updating reg 0x%4x: %d\n", reg, ret);
> >> + if (err)
> >> + *err = ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return ret;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + ret = cci_read(map, reg, &readval, err);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + val = (readval & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> >> +
> >> + return cci_write(map, reg, val, err);
> >
> > Unless I'm mistaken, the regmap cache isn't used. This makes update
> > operations fairly costly due to the read. Could that be improved ?
>
> The problem is that some registers may be volatile,
> think e.g. expsoure on a sensor where auto-exposure is supported.
>
> So normally drivers which want to use regmap caching, also
> provide a whole bunch of tables describing the registers
> (lists of volatile + list of writable + list of readable
> registers).
>
> So enabling caching is not trivial. I think that it would be best
> for drivers which want that to supply their own regmap_config config
> and directly call devm_regmap_init_i2c() if they then use
> the resulting regmaps with the existing cci_* helpers then caching
> will be used automatically.
Would there be a way to use the cache for update operations (as I think
we can consider that registers used in those operations won't be
volatile), and bypass it for standalone reads ?
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cci_update_bits);
> >> +
> >> +int cci_multi_reg_write(struct regmap *map, const struct reg_sequence *regs, int num_regs, int *err)
> >> +{
> >> + int i, ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (err && *err)
> >> + return *err;
> >> +
> >> + for (i = 0; i < num_regs; i++) {
> >> + ret = cci_write(map, regs[i].reg, regs[i].def, err);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + return ret;
> >> +
> >> + if (regs[i].delay_us)
> >> + fsleep(regs[i].delay_us);
> >
> > Do you have an immediate need for this ? If not, I'd drop support for
> > the delay, and add it later when and if needed. It will be easier to
> > discuss the API and use cases with a real user.
>
> This is a 1:1 mirror of regmap_multi_reg_write() note this uses
> the existing struct reg_sequence delay_us field and the:
>
> if (regs[i].delay_us)
> fsleep(regs[i].delay_us);
>
> is copied from the implementation of regmap_multi_reg_write()
The reason why I don't like it much as that such delays are often hacks
hidden in the middle of register arrays that should in many cases be
handled differently. I was hoping that, by not supporting them yet,
we'll have an easier time to get drivers right. Maybe I'm wrong.
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cci_multi_reg_write);
> >> +
> >> +struct regmap *cci_regmap_init_i2c(struct i2c_client *client, int reg_addr_bits)
> >> +{
> >> + struct regmap_config config = {
> >> + .reg_bits = reg_addr_bits,
> >> + .val_bits = 8,
> >> + .reg_format_endian = REGMAP_ENDIAN_BIG,
> >> + };
> >> +
> >> + return devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &config);
> >> +}
> >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cci_regmap_init_i2c);
> >> +
> >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>");
> >> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-cci.h b/include/media/v4l2-cci.h
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 000000000000..69b8a7c4a013
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-cci.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
> >> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> >> +/*
> >> + * MIPI Camera Control Interface (CCI) register access helpers.
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
> >> + */
> >> +#ifndef _V4L2_CCI_H
> >> +#define _V4L2_CCI_H
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> >> +#include <linux/types.h>
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Note cci_reg_8 deliberately is 0, not 1, so that raw
> >> + * (not wrapped in a CCI_REG*() macro) register addresses
> >> + * do 8 bit wide accesses. This allows unchanged use of register
> >> + * initialization lists of raw address, value pairs which only
> >> + * do 8 bit width accesses. Which makes porting drivers easier.
> >
> > It does, but at the same time, it prevents catching errors caused by
> > incorrect register macros. I'm tempted to consider that catching those
> > errors is more important.
> >
> >> + */
> >> +enum cci_reg_type {
> >> + cci_reg_8 = 0,
> >> + cci_reg_16,
> >> + cci_reg_24,
> >> + cci_reg_32,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Macros to define register address with the register width encoded
> >> + * into the higher bits. CCI_REG8() is a no-op so its use is optional.
> >
> > Even if it's a no-op I'd prefer making its use mandatory. It makes
> > driver code more explicit, and eases catching issues during review.
>
> The problem is that almost all sensor drivers contain long list
> of register-address, -val pairs which they send to their own custom
> regmap_multi_reg_write()
>
> See e.g. the drivers/media/i2c/imx219.c (to stick with the imx
> theme from your imx290 request) this has a lot of quite long
> struct imx219_reg arrays with raw initializers.
>
> Often some or all of these registers in such list are
> undocumented (if we have access to a datasheet at all),
> so we simply don't know the register width.
>
> So arguably adding CCI_REG8(x) around all the addresses
> here is wrong, since this suggests we know the register
> width.
>
> With the current proposal to have 0 mean both unset and 8bit
> width this kinda register lists just work and converting
> the driver becomes just a matter of replacing e.g.
> imx219_write_regs() with cci_multi_reg_write().
>
> Where as otherwise we would need to add CCI_REG8(x)
> around the addresses which:
>
> a) Suggests we actually know the register width which
> we often do not know at all
>
> b) causes a ton of needless churn
>
> so I would very much prefer to keep this as as and
> allow unmarked register addresses.
>
> As for the CCI_REG8(x) being useful as an annotation
> during review you are of course free to enforce its
> use during review. And note that I did use it for
> all the OV2680_REG_FOO defines in both ov2680 conversions.
>
> I do agree enforcing its use makes sense for individual
> register address defines. The reason to make it optional
> and the place where I want it to be optional is for
> the array of raw register-addr + initializer-val pairs
> case.
For register arrays, I'm fine with that. For register macros, I don't
want to see
#define MY_WELL_DEFINED_8B_REG 0x1234
For those I want drivers to use CCI_REG8(). It seems we're on the same
page :-)
> >> + */
> >> +#define CCI_REG_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> >> +#define CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT 16
> >> +#define CCI_REG_WIDTH_MASK GENMASK(17, 16)
> >> +
> >> +#define CCI_REG8(x) ((cci_reg_8 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (x))
> >> +#define CCI_REG16(x) ((cci_reg_16 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (x))
> >> +#define CCI_REG24(x) ((cci_reg_24 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (x))
> >> +#define CCI_REG32(x) ((cci_reg_32 << CCI_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | (x))
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * cci_read() - Read a value from a single CCI register
> >> + *
> >> + * @map: Register map to write to
> >
> > s/write to/read from/ ?
>
> Ack, will fix for v2.
>
> >> + * @reg: Register address to write, use CCI_REG#() macros to encode reg width
> >
> > Same.
>
> Ack.
>
> >> + * @val: Pointer to store read value
> >> + * @err: optional pointer to store errors, if a previous error is set the write will be skipped
> >
> > Line wrap ?
>
> Ack.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 16:58 [PATCH 0/3] media: Add MIPI CCI register access helper functions Hans de Goede
2023-06-06 16:58 ` [PATCH 1/3] " Hans de Goede
2023-06-06 20:43 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-07 8:40 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 12:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-07 14:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-07 15:40 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-07 15:58 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 16:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-07 16:20 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 18:03 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-07 7:50 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-07 8:46 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 11:41 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-07 18:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-07 19:01 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 20:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-08 8:33 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-08 8:33 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-08 10:24 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-08 10:27 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2023-06-08 11:01 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-12 15:03 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-13 9:57 ` Sakari Ailus
2023-06-12 13:48 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-12 15:16 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-12 15:33 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-12 16:02 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-06 16:58 ` [PATCH 2/3] media: atomisp: ov2680: Convert to new CCI register access helpers Hans de Goede
2023-06-06 20:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-07 8:53 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 15:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-07 15:59 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 16:07 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-07 16:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2023-06-07 16:18 ` Hans de Goede
2023-06-06 16:58 ` [PATCH 3/3] media: Remove ov_16bit_addr_reg_helpers.h Hans de Goede
2023-06-07 15:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230608102725.GN5058@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox