From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com (Larry McVoy)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199606181641.JAA03609@neteng.engr.sgi.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Jun 18, 96 09:41:47 am
Sadly, it *is* true. I guess many more 6.2 pissed off customers
are waiting down the pipeline.
We can solve it by getting David Miller's development environment
packaged as freeware, (it includes a GNU linker that works)
and put it (really quick) outside the firewall for whoever
is interested.
1) Someone with a couple of days of time needs to take this
and just do it. I was planning on it, but I need
another week or so to start.
2) I'm afraid we'll need to add crt[1n].o as binaries
as these are *not* shipped with the headers and libraries
of 6.2
Any comments, objections from anyone (especially for step 2) ?
>
>If it isn't true, can someone send mail to Tiemann and tell him the
>facts. Sounds like we're getting bad press.
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 05:22:52 -0700
>From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
>To: lm@sgi.com
>Subject: [comp.sys.sgi.apps] gcc part II
>
>Is this not fixed in 6.2? I upgraded my machine at home yesterday, and
>it looked suspiciously like SGI was providing headers and libraries as
>part of the std 6.2 release.
>
> From: jon@vcnet.com (Jon Rust)
> Subject: gcc part II
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.apps
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 22:25:34 -0700
> Organization: IAVC
> Path: cygnus.com!kithrup.com!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net
>!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vcnet.com!jon.vc.net!user
>Lines: 21
>Message-ID: <jon-1706962225340001@jon.vc.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: jon.vc.net
>X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b4
>
> Before I fly off the handle, I wanna make sure this is true.
>
> You can't build ***anything*** unless you fork over a huge wad of cash to
> SGI for their compiler and dev enviro?
>
> **If** this is true, it's horseshit. No wonder SGI is so far down the food
> chain in the land of UNIX. Buying SGI could be one of the biggest mistakes
> I've made since openning my business over 15 months ago. I wonder if my 30
> days are up. Maybe I can ship it back. I only wish I'd bought [insert any
> other UNIX platform here].
>
> If it's not true, could someone plz point me in the right direction to get
> gcc working so I can compile BIND, RADIUS, wuftpd, etc...
>
> pissed off with no build capability,
> jon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Rust
> Internet Access of Ventura County
> jon@vc.net http://www.vc.net 805.383.3500
>
>I know that gcc is not yet 6.2-friendly, but that's much more easily
>fixed than the library/header problem.
>
>Michael
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
--
Peace, Ariel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
To: Larry McVoy <lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19960618171031.g0V9Z4qnQmOnfEyaluNHOlCmjoowVyoha-2w8MrAUhE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199606181641.JAA03609@neteng.engr.sgi.com> from "Larry McVoy" at Jun 18, 96 09:41:47 am
Sadly, it *is* true. I guess many more 6.2 pissed off customers
are waiting down the pipeline.
We can solve it by getting David Miller's development environment
packaged as freeware, (it includes a GNU linker that works)
and put it (really quick) outside the firewall for whoever
is interested.
1) Someone with a couple of days of time needs to take this
and just do it. I was planning on it, but I need
another week or so to start.
2) I'm afraid we'll need to add crt[1n].o as binaries
as these are *not* shipped with the headers and libraries
of 6.2
Any comments, objections from anyone (especially for step 2) ?
>
>If it isn't true, can someone send mail to Tiemann and tell him the
>facts. Sounds like we're getting bad press.
>
>------- Forwarded Message
>
>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 05:22:52 -0700
>From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
>To: lm@sgi.com
>Subject: [comp.sys.sgi.apps] gcc part II
>
>Is this not fixed in 6.2? I upgraded my machine at home yesterday, and
>it looked suspiciously like SGI was providing headers and libraries as
>part of the std 6.2 release.
>
> From: jon@vcnet.com (Jon Rust)
> Subject: gcc part II
> Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi.apps
> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 1996 22:25:34 -0700
> Organization: IAVC
> Path: cygnus.com!kithrup.com!news.Stanford.EDU!agate!howland.reston.ans.net
>!newsfeed.internetmci.com!in1.uu.net!news.vcnet.com!jon.vc.net!user
>Lines: 21
>Message-ID: <jon-1706962225340001@jon.vc.net>
>NNTP-Posting-Host: jon.vc.net
>X-Newsreader: Yet Another NewsWatcher 2.2.0b4
>
> Before I fly off the handle, I wanna make sure this is true.
>
> You can't build ***anything*** unless you fork over a huge wad of cash to
> SGI for their compiler and dev enviro?
>
> **If** this is true, it's horseshit. No wonder SGI is so far down the food
> chain in the land of UNIX. Buying SGI could be one of the biggest mistakes
> I've made since openning my business over 15 months ago. I wonder if my 30
> days are up. Maybe I can ship it back. I only wish I'd bought [insert any
> other UNIX platform here].
>
> If it's not true, could someone plz point me in the right direction to get
> gcc working so I can compile BIND, RADIUS, wuftpd, etc...
>
> pissed off with no build capability,
> jon
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Rust
> Internet Access of Ventura County
> jon@vc.net http://www.vc.net 805.383.3500
>
>I know that gcc is not yet 6.2-friendly, but that's much more easily
>fixed than the library/header problem.
>
>Michael
>
>------- End of Forwarded Message
>
--
Peace, Ariel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-18 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-18 16:41 anyone know if this is true? Larry McVoy
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon [this message]
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
[not found] ` <lm@neteng>
1996-06-18 17:14 ` Donna Yobs
1997-06-19 2:29 ` FYI - free Windows API richard offer
1997-06-19 3:08 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-18 17:11 anyone know if this is true? Dave Olson
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-19 2:07 FYI - free Windows API Larry McVoy
1997-06-19 2:07 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com \
--to=ariel@yon.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=gcc@corp.sgi.com \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=tiemann@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox