From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Cc: lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com (Larry McVoy),
linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:35:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 PDT." <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com>
Hey Ariel, good to hear from you!
It sounds to me like (1) SGI intended to make GCC a viable freeware
option for Irix 6.2, (2) the support in 6.2 is not quite right, due to
slight technical problems. If I understand this correctly, then I think
it won't be too hard to fix the PR-related issues, and I'll be happy to
chime in our support for the intended solution (whatever it may be).
If SGI isn't committing to supplying a reasonable foundation to GNU (w/o
ProDev or IDO), then that's another story.
Michael
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Tiemann <tiemann@cygnus.com>
To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com>,
linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, gcc@corp.sgi.com, tiemann@cygnus.com
Subject: Re: anyone know if this is true?
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:35:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <19960618173519.lZWqAb66l1IJcIfsrZQ8KBQVFwr-TgGVkpsMgPidPFs@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 18 Jun 1996 10:10:31 PDT." <199606181710.KAA14821@yon.engr.sgi.com>
Hey Ariel, good to hear from you!
It sounds to me like (1) SGI intended to make GCC a viable freeware
option for Irix 6.2, (2) the support in 6.2 is not quite right, due to
slight technical problems. If I understand this correctly, then I think
it won't be too hard to fix the PR-related issues, and I'll be happy to
chime in our support for the intended solution (whatever it may be).
If SGI isn't committing to supplying a reasonable foundation to GNU (w/o
ProDev or IDO), then that's another story.
Michael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-18 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-06-18 16:41 anyone know if this is true? Larry McVoy
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:10 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann [this message]
1996-06-18 17:35 ` Michael Tiemann
[not found] ` <lm@neteng>
1996-06-18 17:14 ` Donna Yobs
1997-06-19 2:29 ` FYI - free Windows API richard offer
1997-06-19 3:08 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-18 17:11 anyone know if this is true? Dave Olson
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 17:21 ` Ariel Faigon
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1996-06-18 18:39 ` William J. Earl
1997-06-19 2:07 FYI - free Windows API Larry McVoy
1997-06-19 2:07 ` Larry McVoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=199606181735.KAA22547@cygnus.com \
--to=tiemann@cygnus.com \
--cc=ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=gcc@corp.sgi.com \
--cc=linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com \
--cc=lm@neteng.engr.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox