Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
       [not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.981209154550.5530A-100000@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu>
@ 1998-12-10 15:36 ` ralf
  1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ralf @ 1998-12-10 15:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew R. Baker; +Cc: linux-smp, linux

On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 03:47:19PM -0600, Andrew R. Baker wrote:

> Anyone care to make any comments on porting Linux to an SGI Challenge L
> machine w/ (4) R4400 processors?  Am I crazy to even attempt this?

You're not crazy, after all Linux is already running on bigger iron and
about to run on Sun's E10000.  However you should checkout again what
hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.

  Ralf

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 15:36 ` Linux on an SGI Challenge L ralf
@ 1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
  1998-12-10 16:21     ` Dave Olson
  1998-12-10 18:45     ` ralf
  1998-12-10 16:08   ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
  1998-12-10 16:24   ` Alex deVries
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Steven G. Parker @ 1998-12-10 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ralf, Andrew R. Baker; +Cc: linux-smp, linux

On Dec 10,  4:36pm, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
> Subject: Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
> On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 03:47:19PM -0600, Andrew R. Baker wrote:
>
> > Anyone care to make any comments on porting Linux to an SGI Challenge L
> > machine w/ (4) R4400 processors?  Am I crazy to even attempt this?
>
> You're not crazy, after all Linux is already running on bigger iron and
> about to run on Sun's E10000.  However you should checkout again what
> hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
> an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
> your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.

Actually, the Indy system is a Challenge S.  The Indigo^2 system is
a Challenge M.   The Challenge L is the desk-side system and can indeed
support multiple processors.

I can only comment on the model line - not on whether you are crazy or not :)

Steve Parker

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 15:36 ` Linux on an SGI Challenge L ralf
  1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
@ 1998-12-10 16:08   ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
  1998-12-10 16:24   ` Alex deVries
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Fernando D. Mato Mira @ 1998-12-10 16:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux


>hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
>an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
>your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.

Slip. Challenge S == "Indy" . Challenge L = deskside (max 8 proc)

Challenge DM = deskside (max 4?)


Fernando D. Mato Mira                    
Real-Time SW Eng & Networking            
Advanced Systems Engineering Division
CSEM - Centre Suisse d'Electronique et de
Microtechnique                                 
Jaquet-Droz 1                         email:  matomira@acm.org
CH-2007 Neuchatel                       tel: +41 (32) 720-5157
Switzerland                             FAX: +41 (32) 720-5720

<http://www.csemne.ch/>www.csem.ch                  <http://www.vrai.com/>w
ww.vrai.com              
<http://ligwww.epfl.ch/matomira.html>http://ligwww.epfl.ch/matomira.html  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
@ 1998-12-10 16:21     ` Dave Olson
  1998-12-10 16:21       ` Dave Olson
  1998-12-10 18:45     ` ralf
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Olson @ 1998-12-10 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven G. Parker; +Cc: ralf, andrewb, linux-smp, linux

Steven G. Parker wrote: 
|  On Dec 10,  4:36pm, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
|  > > Anyone care to make any comments on porting Linux to an SGI Challenge L
|  > > machine w/ (4) R4400 processors?  Am I crazy to even attempt this?
|  >
|  > You're not crazy, after all Linux is already running on bigger iron and
|  > about to run on Sun's E10000.  However you should checkout again what
|  > hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
|  > an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
|  > your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.
|  
|  Actually, the Indy system is a Challenge S.  The Indigo^2 system is
|  a Challenge M.   The Challenge L is the desk-side system and can indeed
|  support multiple processors.
|  
|  I can only comment on the model line - not on whether you are crazy or not :)

The hardware is radically different.  The only shared item is the cpu,
and even it's used in a fairly different way.  indy w/o graphics as
challenge S, etc. is strictly a marketing idea.

It's clearly doable, but you need a whole new set of hardware specs.

Dave Olson, Silicon Graphics
http://reality.sgi.com/olson   olson@sgi.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 16:21     ` Dave Olson
@ 1998-12-10 16:21       ` Dave Olson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Olson @ 1998-12-10 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven G. Parker; +Cc: ralf, andrewb, linux-smp, linux

Steven G. Parker wrote: 
|  On Dec 10,  4:36pm, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
|  > > Anyone care to make any comments on porting Linux to an SGI Challenge L
|  > > machine w/ (4) R4400 processors?  Am I crazy to even attempt this?
|  >
|  > You're not crazy, after all Linux is already running on bigger iron and
|  > about to run on Sun's E10000.  However you should checkout again what
|  > hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
|  > an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
|  > your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.
|  
|  Actually, the Indy system is a Challenge S.  The Indigo^2 system is
|  a Challenge M.   The Challenge L is the desk-side system and can indeed
|  support multiple processors.
|  
|  I can only comment on the model line - not on whether you are crazy or not :)

The hardware is radically different.  The only shared item is the cpu,
and even it's used in a fairly different way.  indy w/o graphics as
challenge S, etc. is strictly a marketing idea.

It's clearly doable, but you need a whole new set of hardware specs.

Dave Olson, Silicon Graphics
http://reality.sgi.com/olson   olson@sgi.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 15:36 ` Linux on an SGI Challenge L ralf
  1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
  1998-12-10 16:08   ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
@ 1998-12-10 16:24   ` Alex deVries
  1998-12-10 16:44     ` Dave Olson
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Alex deVries @ 1998-12-10 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ralf; +Cc: Andrew R. Baker, linux-smp, linux


What's in a Challenge L exactly, in terms of devices and busses?

- Alex

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 16:24   ` Alex deVries
@ 1998-12-10 16:44     ` Dave Olson
  1998-12-10 16:44       ` Dave Olson
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Olson @ 1998-12-10 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex deVries; +Cc: ralf, andrewb, linux-smp, linux

Alex deVries wrote: 
|  
|  What's in a Challenge L exactly, in terms of devices and busses?

same cpu bus, but used differently
hidden gio bus within some cards (not quite the same as indy)
vme
wd95 scsi, not wd93
different ethernet
different serial
different memory/io interface chip, with layered and "interesting"
	buses(plural) to various kinds of i/o
interrupts (of course) are quite different, with some interesting
issues in the implementation.

There may still be some old white papers on www.sgi.com


Dave Olson, Silicon Graphics
http://reality.sgi.com/olson   olson@sgi.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 16:44     ` Dave Olson
@ 1998-12-10 16:44       ` Dave Olson
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dave Olson @ 1998-12-10 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex deVries; +Cc: ralf, andrewb, linux-smp, linux

Alex deVries wrote: 
|  
|  What's in a Challenge L exactly, in terms of devices and busses?

same cpu bus, but used differently
hidden gio bus within some cards (not quite the same as indy)
vme
wd95 scsi, not wd93
different ethernet
different serial
different memory/io interface chip, with layered and "interesting"
	buses(plural) to various kinds of i/o
interrupts (of course) are quite different, with some interesting
issues in the implementation.

There may still be some old white papers on www.sgi.com


Dave Olson, Silicon Graphics
http://reality.sgi.com/olson   olson@sgi.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
  1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
  1998-12-10 16:21     ` Dave Olson
@ 1998-12-10 18:45     ` ralf
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: ralf @ 1998-12-10 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Steven G. Parker; +Cc: Andrew R. Baker, linux-smp, linux

On Thu, Dec 10, 1998 at 08:59:11AM -0700, Steven G. Parker wrote:

> On Dec 10,  4:36pm, ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
> > Subject: Re: Linux on an SGI Challenge L
> > On Wed, Dec 09, 1998 at 03:47:19PM -0600, Andrew R. Baker wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone care to make any comments on porting Linux to an SGI Challenge L
> > > machine w/ (4) R4400 processors?  Am I crazy to even attempt this?
> >
> > You're not crazy, after all Linux is already running on bigger iron and
> > about to run on Sun's E10000.  However you should checkout again what
> > hardware you actually have on your system.  A Challenge L is mostly like
> > an Indy (which is supported), that is strictly uniprocessor.  So
> > your system either is not a multiprocessor system or not a Challenge L.
> 
> Actually, the Indy system is a Challenge S.  The Indigo^2 system is
> a Challenge M.   The Challenge L is the desk-side system and can indeed
> support multiple processors.
> 
> I can only comment on the model line - not on whether you are crazy or not :)

Sorry, I'm out of my mind since the big flu knocked me down during
last weekend's CLOWN cluster event.  I was actually thinking
Challenge S.

 Ralf  (Going back to Asprine and hot tee ...)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1998-12-10 18:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <Pine.LNX.3.96.981209154550.5530A-100000@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu>
1998-12-10 15:36 ` Linux on an SGI Challenge L ralf
1998-12-10 15:59   ` Steven G. Parker
1998-12-10 16:21     ` Dave Olson
1998-12-10 16:21       ` Dave Olson
1998-12-10 18:45     ` ralf
1998-12-10 16:08   ` Fernando D. Mato Mira
1998-12-10 16:24   ` Alex deVries
1998-12-10 16:44     ` Dave Olson
1998-12-10 16:44       ` Dave Olson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox