* 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong
@ 2003-12-23 17:57 Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-29 0:25 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-12-23 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf; +Cc: linux-mips
If you take a look at scall64-n32.S, you'll find that there's no hole after
sendfile64. But in <asm/unistd.h> there is. So glibc gets built with the
wrong number for clock_gettime and confusion ensues...
Index: unistd.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/cvs/linux/include/asm-mips/unistd.h,v
retrieving revision 1.55
diff -u -p -r1.55 unistd.h
--- unistd.h 9 Oct 2003 15:43:22 -0000 1.55
+++ unistd.h 23 Dec 2003 17:56:25 -0000
@@ -769,17 +769,17 @@
#define __NR_statfs64 (__NR_Linux + 217)
#define __NR_fstatfs64 (__NR_Linux + 218)
#define __NR_sendfile64 (__NR_Linux + 219)
-#define __NR_timer_create (__NR_Linux + 221)
-#define __NR_timer_settime (__NR_Linux + 222)
-#define __NR_timer_gettime (__NR_Linux + 223)
-#define __NR_timer_getoverrun (__NR_Linux + 224)
-#define __NR_timer_delete (__NR_Linux + 225)
-#define __NR_clock_settime (__NR_Linux + 226)
-#define __NR_clock_gettime (__NR_Linux + 227)
-#define __NR_clock_getres (__NR_Linux + 228)
-#define __NR_clock_nanosleep (__NR_Linux + 229)
-#define __NR_tgkill (__NR_Linux + 230)
-#define __NR_utimes (__NR_Linux + 231)
+#define __NR_timer_create (__NR_Linux + 220)
+#define __NR_timer_settime (__NR_Linux + 221)
+#define __NR_timer_gettime (__NR_Linux + 222)
+#define __NR_timer_getoverrun (__NR_Linux + 223)
+#define __NR_timer_delete (__NR_Linux + 224)
+#define __NR_clock_settime (__NR_Linux + 225)
+#define __NR_clock_gettime (__NR_Linux + 226)
+#define __NR_clock_getres (__NR_Linux + 227)
+#define __NR_clock_nanosleep (__NR_Linux + 228)
+#define __NR_tgkill (__NR_Linux + 229)
+#define __NR_utimes (__NR_Linux + 230)
/*
* Offset of the last N32 flavoured syscall
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong
2003-12-23 17:57 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2003-12-29 0:25 ` Ralf Baechle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ralf Baechle @ 2003-12-29 0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: linux-mips
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 12:57:32PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> If you take a look at scall64-n32.S, you'll find that there's no hole after
> sendfile64. But in <asm/unistd.h> there is. So glibc gets built with the
> wrong number for clock_gettime and confusion ensues...
Applied. I also fixed __NR_Linux_syscalls and __NR_N32_Linux_syscalls
which also were off by one but didn't get fixed by your patch.
Ralf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-12-29 0:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-12-23 17:57 2.5 n32 syscall numbers are wrong Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-12-29 0:25 ` Ralf Baechle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox