Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont
@ 2017-02-02  8:56 Joshua Kinard
  2017-02-02 10:00 ` James Hogan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Kinard @ 2017-02-02  8:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ralf Baechle, Maciej W. Rozycki; +Cc: Linux/MIPS

From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>

In arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c, replace initial printk's in three
bug-checking functions with pr_info and replace several continuation
printk's with pr_info/pr_cont calls to avoid kernel log output like
this:

    [    0.899065] Checking for the daddi bug...
    [    0.899098] no.

This makes the output appear correctly:

    [    0.898643] Checking for the daddi bug... no.

Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
index a378e44688f5..d4483551a926 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 	long v1[8], v2[8], w[8];
 	int bug, fix, i;
 
-	printk("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
 
 	/*
 	 * Testing discovered false negatives for certain code offsets
@@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 			bug = 1;
 
 	if (bug == 0) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	fix = 1;
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
@@ -160,11 +160,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
 			fix = 0;
 
 	if (fix == 1) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !R4000_WAR ? r4kwar : nowar);
 }
 
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	void *handler;
 	long v, tmp;
 
-	printk("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
@@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	if (daddi_ov) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	local_irq_save(flags);
 	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
@@ -236,11 +236,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 
 	if (daddi_ov) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
 }
 
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 {
 	long v, w, tmp;
 
-	printk("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
+	pr_info("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
 
 	/*
 	 * The following code leads to a wrong result of daddiu when
@@ -288,11 +288,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 	daddiu_bug = v != w;
 
 	if (!daddiu_bug) {
-		printk("no.\n");
+		pr_cont("no.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("yes, workaround... ");
+	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
 
 	asm volatile(
 		"addiu	%2, $0, %3\n\t"
@@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
 		: "I" (0xffffffffffffdb9aUL), "I" (0x1234));
 
 	if (v == w) {
-		printk("yes.\n");
+		pr_cont("yes.\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
-	printk("no.\n");
+	pr_cont("no.\n");
 	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
 }
 

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont
  2017-02-02  8:56 [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont Joshua Kinard
@ 2017-02-02 10:00 ` James Hogan
  2017-02-02 10:41   ` Joshua Kinard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Hogan @ 2017-02-02 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joshua Kinard; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, Maciej W. Rozycki, Linux/MIPS

Hi Joshua,

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:56:26AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> 
> In arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c, replace initial printk's in three
> bug-checking functions with pr_info and replace several continuation
> printk's with pr_info/pr_cont calls to avoid kernel log output like
> this:
> 
>     [    0.899065] Checking for the daddi bug...
>     [    0.899098] no.
> 
> This makes the output appear correctly:
> 
>     [    0.898643] Checking for the daddi bug... no.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>

A variation of this patch is already applied, but without the change of
printk -> pr_info:

https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/14916/

https://git.linux-mips.org/cgit/ralf/upstream-sfr.git/commit/?id=35e7f7885e1b1b272a73c0de3227fc9a3e95a7e3

Cheers
James

> ---
>  arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c |   30 +++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
> index a378e44688f5..d4483551a926 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
>  	long v1[8], v2[8], w[8];
>  	int bug, fix, i;
>  
> -	printk("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
> +	pr_info("Checking for the multiply/shift bug... ");
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Testing discovered false negatives for certain code offsets
> @@ -148,11 +148,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
>  			bug = 1;
>  
>  	if (bug == 0) {
> -		printk("no.\n");
> +		pr_cont("no.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("yes, workaround... ");
> +	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
>  
>  	fix = 1;
>  	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
> @@ -160,11 +160,11 @@ static inline void check_mult_sh(void)
>  			fix = 0;
>  
>  	if (fix == 1) {
> -		printk("yes.\n");
> +		pr_cont("yes.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("no.\n");
> +	pr_cont("no.\n");
>  	panic(bug64hit, !R4000_WAR ? r4kwar : nowar);
>  }
>  
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
>  	void *handler;
>  	long v, tmp;
>  
> -	printk("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
> +	pr_info("Checking for the daddi bug... ");
>  
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
> @@ -218,11 +218,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
>  	if (daddi_ov) {
> -		printk("no.\n");
> +		pr_cont("no.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("yes, workaround... ");
> +	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
>  
>  	local_irq_save(flags);
>  	handler = set_except_vector(EXCCODE_OV, handle_daddi_ov);
> @@ -236,11 +236,11 @@ static inline void check_daddi(void)
>  	local_irq_restore(flags);
>  
>  	if (daddi_ov) {
> -		printk("yes.\n");
> +		pr_cont("yes.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("no.\n");
> +	pr_cont("no.\n");
>  	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
>  }
>  
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
>  {
>  	long v, w, tmp;
>  
> -	printk("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
> +	pr_info("Checking for the daddiu bug... ");
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The following code leads to a wrong result of daddiu when
> @@ -288,11 +288,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
>  	daddiu_bug = v != w;
>  
>  	if (!daddiu_bug) {
> -		printk("no.\n");
> +		pr_cont("no.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("yes, workaround... ");
> +	pr_cont("yes, workaround... ");
>  
>  	asm volatile(
>  		"addiu	%2, $0, %3\n\t"
> @@ -304,11 +304,11 @@ static inline void check_daddiu(void)
>  		: "I" (0xffffffffffffdb9aUL), "I" (0x1234));
>  
>  	if (v == w) {
> -		printk("yes.\n");
> +		pr_cont("yes.\n");
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	printk("no.\n");
> +	pr_cont("no.\n");
>  	panic(bug64hit, !DADDI_WAR ? daddiwar : nowar);
>  }
>  
> 
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont
  2017-02-02 10:00 ` James Hogan
@ 2017-02-02 10:41   ` Joshua Kinard
  2017-02-02 10:48     ` James Hogan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Kinard @ 2017-02-02 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: James Hogan; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, Maciej W. Rozycki, Linux/MIPS

On 02/02/2017 05:00, James Hogan wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:56:26AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
>> From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
>>
>> In arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c, replace initial printk's in three
>> bug-checking functions with pr_info and replace several continuation
>> printk's with pr_info/pr_cont calls to avoid kernel log output like
>> this:
>>
>>     [    0.899065] Checking for the daddi bug...
>>     [    0.899098] no.
>>
>> This makes the output appear correctly:
>>
>>     [    0.898643] Checking for the daddi bug... no.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> 
> A variation of this patch is already applied, but without the change of
> printk -> pr_info:
> 
> https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/14916/
> 
> https://git.linux-mips.org/cgit/ralf/upstream-sfr.git/commit/?id=35e7f7885e1b1b272a73c0de3227fc9a3e95a7e3

Oh, thanks for that.  I keep forgetting to go look at the upstream git queue.
I noticed the issue when trying to boot my Onyx2 back up and only checked the
main tree to see if it was fixed.

Shouldn't the printk's have a log level, though?  I thought that was the
motivation behind using the various pr_* calls.

--J

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont
  2017-02-02 10:41   ` Joshua Kinard
@ 2017-02-02 10:48     ` James Hogan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: James Hogan @ 2017-02-02 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joshua Kinard; +Cc: Ralf Baechle, Maciej W. Rozycki, Linux/MIPS

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1589 bytes --]

On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 05:41:48AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 05:00, James Hogan wrote:
> > Hi Joshua,
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:56:26AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> >> From: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> >>
> >> In arch/mips/kernel/cpu-bugs64.c, replace initial printk's in three
> >> bug-checking functions with pr_info and replace several continuation
> >> printk's with pr_info/pr_cont calls to avoid kernel log output like
> >> this:
> >>
> >>     [    0.899065] Checking for the daddi bug...
> >>     [    0.899098] no.
> >>
> >> This makes the output appear correctly:
> >>
> >>     [    0.898643] Checking for the daddi bug... no.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Joshua Kinard <kumba@gentoo.org>
> > 
> > A variation of this patch is already applied, but without the change of
> > printk -> pr_info:
> > 
> > https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/14916/
> > 
> > https://git.linux-mips.org/cgit/ralf/upstream-sfr.git/commit/?id=35e7f7885e1b1b272a73c0de3227fc9a3e95a7e3
> 
> Oh, thanks for that.  I keep forgetting to go look at the upstream git queue.
> I noticed the issue when trying to boot my Onyx2 back up and only checked the
> main tree to see if it was fixed.
> 
> Shouldn't the printk's have a log level, though?  I thought that was the
> motivation behind using the various pr_* calls.

Yes probably. I'd consider that a separate change to fixing the
continuations though (according to a quick git grep there are 422
printks without log levels remaining in mips-for-linux-next arch/mips).

Cheers
James

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-02-02 10:49 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-02  8:56 [PATCH] MIPS: Replace printk calls in cpu-bugs64.c with pr_info/pr_cont Joshua Kinard
2017-02-02 10:00 ` James Hogan
2017-02-02 10:41   ` Joshua Kinard
2017-02-02 10:48     ` James Hogan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox