From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: jianchao.wang <jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS:wrong usage of l_exc_copy in octeon-memcpy.S
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:53:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220115331.GA24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487562178-2901-1-git-send-email-jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:42:58AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> l_exc_copy() is usually to be used like this:
> 1 EXC( LOAD t0, UNIT(0)(src), l_exc)
> 2 EXC( LOAD t1, UNIT(1)(src), l_exc_copy)
> 3 EXC( LOAD t2, UNIT(2)(src), l_exc_copy)
> 4 EXC( LOAD t3, UNIT(3)(src), l_exc_copy)
> When the fault occurs on row 4, l_exc_copy will get the bad
> addr through THREAD_BUADDR(), complete the copy of row
> 1,2 and 3, and then return the len that has not been copied.
> l_exc_copy assumes the src is smaller thann the bad addr.It will
> increase src by 1 until reach the bad addr.
>
> octeon-memcpy.S use the l_exc_copy with wrong way which make src
> could be greater than bad addr. We will fix it in this patch.
> We add the max offset of LOAD to 15 here to fix the issue without
> adding new commands . Howerver, the side effect is that, when LOAD
> fails in few case, l_exc_copy has to copy more.
Is this trying to fix the same issue as the following patch?
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/14978/
Thanks
James
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS:wrong usage of l_exc_copy in octeon-memcpy.S
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:53:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170220115331.GA24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20170220115331.9eZqL901AQlnBYY9iY3bONmXJcDt8OuOL7pUI-QrGN0@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487562178-2901-1-git-send-email-jianchao.wan9@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1052 bytes --]
Hi,
On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 11:42:58AM +0800, jianchao.wang wrote:
> l_exc_copy() is usually to be used like this:
> 1 EXC( LOAD t0, UNIT(0)(src), l_exc)
> 2 EXC( LOAD t1, UNIT(1)(src), l_exc_copy)
> 3 EXC( LOAD t2, UNIT(2)(src), l_exc_copy)
> 4 EXC( LOAD t3, UNIT(3)(src), l_exc_copy)
> When the fault occurs on row 4, l_exc_copy will get the bad
> addr through THREAD_BUADDR(), complete the copy of row
> 1,2 and 3, and then return the len that has not been copied.
> l_exc_copy assumes the src is smaller thann the bad addr.It will
> increase src by 1 until reach the bad addr.
>
> octeon-memcpy.S use the l_exc_copy with wrong way which make src
> could be greater than bad addr. We will fix it in this patch.
> We add the max offset of LOAD to 15 here to fix the issue without
> adding new commands . Howerver, the side effect is that, when LOAD
> fails in few case, l_exc_copy has to copy more.
Is this trying to fix the same issue as the following patch?
https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/14978/
Thanks
James
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-20 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-20 3:42 [PATCH] MIPS:wrong usage of l_exc_copy in octeon-memcpy.S jianchao.wang
2017-02-20 11:53 ` James Hogan [this message]
2017-02-20 11:53 ` James Hogan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170220115331.GA24226@jhogan-linux.le.imgtec.org \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=jianchao.wan9@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox