* [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
@ 2024-02-09 18:16 Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Erick Archer @ 2024-02-09 18:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Fainelli, Thomas Gleixner, Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: Erick Archer, linux-mips, linux-kernel,
Broadcom internal kernel review list, linux-hardening
This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm6345_l1_cpu" and this
structure ends in a flexible array:
struct bcm6345_l1_cpu {
[...]
u32 enable_cache[];
};
the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
kzalloc() function.
This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
index 9745a119d0e6..eb02d203c963 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __init bcm6345_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
else if (intc->n_words != n_words)
return -EINVAL;
- cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
+ cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(struct_size(cpu, enable_cache, n_words),
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cpu)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
2024-02-09 18:16 [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
@ 2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2024-02-10 0:19 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10 1:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gustavo A. R. Silva @ 2024-02-09 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erick Archer, Florian Fainelli, Thomas Gleixner,
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: linux-mips, linux-kernel, Broadcom internal kernel review list,
linux-hardening
On 2/9/24 12:16, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
>
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm6345_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
>
> struct bcm6345_l1_cpu {
> [...]
> u32 enable_cache[];
> };
>
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
>
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
LGTM:
Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Thanks
--
Gustavo
> ---
> drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> index 9745a119d0e6..eb02d203c963 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-bcm6345-l1.c
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static int __init bcm6345_l1_init_one(struct device_node *dn,
> else if (intc->n_words != n_words)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(sizeof(*cpu) + n_words * sizeof(u32),
> + cpu = intc->cpus[idx] = kzalloc(struct_size(cpu, enable_cache, n_words),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!cpu)
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
2024-02-09 18:16 [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
@ 2024-02-10 0:19 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10 1:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kees Cook @ 2024-02-10 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erick Archer
Cc: Florian Fainelli, Thomas Gleixner, Gustavo A. R. Silva,
linux-mips, linux-kernel, Broadcom internal kernel review list,
linux-hardening
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 07:16:00PM +0100, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
>
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm6345_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
>
> struct bcm6345_l1_cpu {
> [...]
> u32 enable_cache[];
> };
>
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
>
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
--
Kees Cook
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic
2024-02-09 18:16 [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2024-02-10 0:19 ` Kees Cook
@ 2024-02-10 1:19 ` Florian Fainelli
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2024-02-10 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Erick Archer, Thomas Gleixner, Gustavo A. R. Silva
Cc: linux-mips, linux-kernel, Broadcom internal kernel review list,
linux-hardening
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 878 bytes --]
On 2/9/2024 10:16 AM, Erick Archer wrote:
> This is an effort to get rid of all multiplications from allocation
> functions in order to prevent integer overflows [1].
>
> As the cpu variable is a pointer to "struct bcm6345_l1_cpu" and this
> structure ends in a flexible array:
>
> struct bcm6345_l1_cpu {
> [...]
> u32 enable_cache[];
> };
>
> the preferred way in the kernel is to use the struct_size() helper to
> do the arithmetic instead of the argument "size + count * size" in the
> kzalloc() function.
>
> This way, the code is more readable and more safer.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162 [2]
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
--
Florian
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4221 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-10 1:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-09 18:16 [PATCH] irqchip/bcm-6345-l1: Prefer struct_size over open coded arithmetic Erick Archer
2024-02-09 18:38 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2024-02-10 0:19 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-10 1:19 ` Florian Fainelli
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox