Linux MIPS Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Linux->Indy->O2
@ 1999-09-27 13:49 Gavin Kistner
  1999-09-27 14:03 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Kistner @ 1999-09-27 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux

I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux. I'm wondering: does linux support for one machine get fully implemented and then tweaked to go to others, or is it a ground-up approach for each new machine in the port list?

Basically, I'm wondering how hard its going to be to take linux over to the O2 once the Indy stuff gets really done.

In that vein, I want linux for my O2 so badly (even just in a command-line configuration) that I'm thinking about trying to help. What are the major obstacles which need overcoming to get the current state of linux-mips to work on an O2?

TIA,
--
Gavin Kistner                                   Creative Director
+1 314 725 5096                        Image Refinery Productions
gavin@refinery.com                        http://www.refinery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-27 13:49 Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
@ 1999-09-27 14:03 ` Gavin Kistner
  1999-09-27 14:22 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Han-Wen Nienhuys
  1999-09-28 19:27 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Gavin Kistner @ 1999-09-27 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux

At 8:49 AM -0500 1999-09-27, Gavin Kistner wrote:
>I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux.

I, of course, meant the Indigo 2.

--
Gavin Kistner                                   Creative Director
+1 314 725 5096                        Image Refinery Productions
gavin@refinery.com                        http://www.refinery.com

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-27 13:49 Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
  1999-09-27 14:03 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
@ 1999-09-27 14:22 ` Han-Wen Nienhuys
  1999-09-28 19:27 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Han-Wen Nienhuys @ 1999-09-27 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Kistner; +Cc: linux

gavin@refinery.com writes:
> I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux. I'm wondering: does linux support for one machine get fully implemented and then tweaked to go to others, or is it a ground-up approach for each new machine in the port list?
> 
> Basically, I'm wondering how hard its going to be to take linux over to the O2 once the Indy stuff gets really done.
> 
> In that vein, I want linux for my O2 so badly (even just in a command-line configuration) that I'm thinking about trying to help. What are the major obstacles which need overcoming to get the current state of linux-mips to work on an O2?

[Disclaimer, I don't use Linux/SGI, and don't know much about the
details].

Concerning X: 

Last thing I heard was that a simple SGI/Indy framebuffer was going to
be in XFree86 v4.

The architecture of the O2 and Indy are entirely different (the indy
has a pipeline of graphics chips that do successive transformations),
while the O2 has one big pool of memory that is used as framebuffer,
main memory, texture memory, etc. simultaneously. The architecture is
different, so you can't simply port the Indy X server.

I'm not sure about the O2 port, but it has been asked before.  Maybe
you can browse the list archive.

-- 

Han-Wen Nienhuys, hanwen@cs.uu.nl ** GNU LilyPond - The Music Typesetter 
      http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/index.html 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-27 13:49 Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
  1999-09-27 14:03 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
  1999-09-27 14:22 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Han-Wen Nienhuys
@ 1999-09-28 19:27 ` Alan Hoyt
  1999-09-28 20:36   ` Linux->Indy->O2 William J. Earl
       [not found]   ` <37F12696.76757893@ulink.net>
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Hoyt @ 1999-09-28 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Gavin Kistner; +Cc: linux

Gavin Kistner wrote:

> I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux. I'm wondering: does linux support for

I believe Ulf Carlsson is working on REX3 support - that's Indy and Indigo2

> one machine get fully implemented and then tweaked to go to others, or is it a ground-up approach for each new machine in the port list?

Two issues: X is huge and the architectures are quite different - your talking a *major* serious effort.


 - Alan Hoyt -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-28 19:27 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
@ 1999-09-28 20:36   ` William J. Earl
  1999-09-28 22:42     ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
       [not found]   ` <37F12696.76757893@ulink.net>
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: William J. Earl @ 1999-09-28 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Hoyt; +Cc: Gavin Kistner, linux

Alan Hoyt writes:
 > Gavin Kistner wrote:
 > 
 > > I noticed the previous poster mentioning that the Indy2 doesn't have X support yet under Linux. I'm wondering: does linux support for
 > 
 > I believe Ulf Carlsson is working on REX3 support - that's Indy and Indigo2

      REX3 is "Newport", AKA "XL", graphics, which was the default on
Indy and a lower-cost option on Indigo2.  Most Indigo2 and some Indy
systems have more complex graphics adapters ("Elan", "Extreme", "XZ", "Impact").

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-28 20:36   ` Linux->Indy->O2 William J. Earl
@ 1999-09-28 22:42     ` Alan Hoyt
  1999-09-29  0:18       ` Linux->Indy->O2 William J. Earl
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Hoyt @ 1999-09-28 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SGI Mips; +Cc: William J. Earl

"William J. Earl" wrote:

>       REX3 is "Newport", AKA "XL", graphics, which was the default on
> Indy and a lower-cost option on Indigo2.  Most Indigo2 and some Indy
> systems have more complex graphics adapters ("Elan", "Extreme", "XZ", "Impact").

Sorry, thought everyone knew - here is an excerpt from the SGI Hardware FAQ for those who are curious:

  Indy: IP22:
  Express (XZ ["GR3-Elan": 24, Z, 4 GE7, 1 RE3.1]),
  Newport (XL ["NG1": 8|24, soft Z, NG1, REX3])

  Indigo2: IP22:
  Express (XZ ["GR3-Elan": 24, Z, 4 GE7, 1 RE3.1]),
  Newport (XL ["NG1": 8|24, soft Z, NG1, REX3]),
  Newpress (Extreme+XL ["GU1-Extreme": 32 Z]),
  Ultra (Extreme ["GU1-Extreme", 32 Z])

What was the most prevalent graphics configuration on the Indigo2s?


 - Alan Hoyt -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
       [not found]   ` <37F12696.76757893@ulink.net>
@ 1999-09-28 23:04     ` Alan Hoyt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Alan Hoyt @ 1999-09-28 23:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: SGI Mips; +Cc: Bob Pielock

Bob Pielock wrote:

> So are there any websites with message boards for all of this? Can someone at SGI setup a web based bulliten board for all the developement
> stuff? I think if something people could all communicate on a board was available, updates would be more likely to be posted, and the website
> would have more info on it then its current state..

I guess I am missing something - isn't that what this list accomplishes?  If you want more detail,  you can access the source via anonymous CVS
- you can't follow development any closer than that!

 - Alan Hoyt -

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux->Indy->O2
  1999-09-28 22:42     ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
@ 1999-09-29  0:18       ` William J. Earl
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: William J. Earl @ 1999-09-29  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alan Hoyt; +Cc: SGI Mips

Alan Hoyt writes:
 > "William J. Earl" wrote:
 > 
 > >       REX3 is "Newport", AKA "XL", graphics, which was the default on
 > > Indy and a lower-cost option on Indigo2.  Most Indigo2 and some Indy
 > > systems have more complex graphics adapters ("Elan", "Extreme", "XZ", "Impact").
 > 
 > Sorry, thought everyone knew - here is an excerpt from the SGI Hardware FAQ for those who are curious:
 > 
 >   Indy: IP22:
 >   Express (XZ ["GR3-Elan": 24, Z, 4 GE7, 1 RE3.1]),
 >   Newport (XL ["NG1": 8|24, soft Z, NG1, REX3])
 > 
 >   Indigo2: IP22:
 >   Express (XZ ["GR3-Elan": 24, Z, 4 GE7, 1 RE3.1]),
 >   Newport (XL ["NG1": 8|24, soft Z, NG1, REX3]),
 >   Newpress (Extreme+XL ["GU1-Extreme": 32 Z]),
 >   Ultra (Extreme ["GU1-Extreme", 32 Z])
 > 
 > What was the most prevalent graphics configuration on the Indigo2s?

      XZ was probably the most common, until Impact was released.  On
the Indigo2 R10000, Impact (not on the above list) is probably the
most common.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1999-09-29  0:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1999-09-27 13:49 Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
1999-09-27 14:03 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Gavin Kistner
1999-09-27 14:22 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Han-Wen Nienhuys
1999-09-28 19:27 ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
1999-09-28 20:36   ` Linux->Indy->O2 William J. Earl
1999-09-28 22:42     ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt
1999-09-29  0:18       ` Linux->Indy->O2 William J. Earl
     [not found]   ` <37F12696.76757893@ulink.net>
1999-09-28 23:04     ` Linux->Indy->O2 Alan Hoyt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox