From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: module.h usage cleanup.
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:20:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F566384.5050501@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306190826.GJ4519@linux-mips.org>
On 12-03-06 02:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:24:43PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> Not a lot to see here, really. MIPS had usages of module.h tucked
>> away in a couple asm files, and that was masking some of the other
>> implicit users, plus preventing MIPS from getting the full benefit
>> of not having to feed module.h to cpp 35,000 times.
>>
>> I've left the two drivers/serial commits separate, in case there
>> is a desire to have them go in via Greg's trees, but they are a
>> required dependency for the arch/mips fixes, so I think it makes
>> sense they stay together with the other changes here.
>>
>> I will have some arch independent module.h cleanups (in fs and lib)
>> that will require me to create a module.h tree for 3.4, so I can
>> carry this there if required. But this lot is all self-contained
>> to MIPS and so I'd be fine with (and actually prefer) this going in
>> via the MIPS tree. No strong preference - either way, let me know.
>
> Haven't received any comment and the patches are trivial so I'm going
> to queue them hopeing that Alan Cox (not on cc ...) doesn't mind ...
I stuck them in linux-next for additional sanity testing above the
defconfig builds that I did and nothing caught fire. I'll back
them out from my for-next branch now that I know you've got them queued
via the mips for-next.
Thanks!
Paul.
>
> Ralf
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: module.h usage cleanup.
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 14:20:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F566384.5050501@windriver.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20120306192036.yAkEXh3XYX7lC3e5YcbSYXOEeQOhlTtYtaiKB9mZTeo@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120306190826.GJ4519@linux-mips.org>
On 12-03-06 02:08 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 02:24:43PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> Hi Ralf,
>>
>> Not a lot to see here, really. MIPS had usages of module.h tucked
>> away in a couple asm files, and that was masking some of the other
>> implicit users, plus preventing MIPS from getting the full benefit
>> of not having to feed module.h to cpp 35,000 times.
>>
>> I've left the two drivers/serial commits separate, in case there
>> is a desire to have them go in via Greg's trees, but they are a
>> required dependency for the arch/mips fixes, so I think it makes
>> sense they stay together with the other changes here.
>>
>> I will have some arch independent module.h cleanups (in fs and lib)
>> that will require me to create a module.h tree for 3.4, so I can
>> carry this there if required. But this lot is all self-contained
>> to MIPS and so I'd be fine with (and actually prefer) this going in
>> via the MIPS tree. No strong preference - either way, let me know.
>
> Haven't received any comment and the patches are trivial so I'm going
> to queue them hopeing that Alan Cox (not on cc ...) doesn't mind ...
I stuck them in linux-next for additional sanity testing above the
defconfig builds that I did and nothing caught fire. I'll back
them out from my for-next branch now that I know you've got them queued
via the mips for-next.
Thanks!
Paul.
>
> Ralf
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-28 19:24 [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: module.h usage cleanup Paul Gortmaker
2012-02-28 19:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] serial: MIPS DECstation zs.c driver needs module.h Paul Gortmaker
2012-02-28 19:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] serial: MIPS swarm sb1250-duart.c " Paul Gortmaker
2012-02-28 19:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] MIPS: fix several implicit uses of export.h/module.h Paul Gortmaker
2012-02-28 19:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] MIPS: delete bogus module.h usage in termios.h Paul Gortmaker
2012-02-28 19:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] MIPS: dont use module.h just to export symbols in asm/uasm.h Paul Gortmaker
2012-03-06 19:08 ` [PATCH 0/5] MIPS: module.h usage cleanup Ralf Baechle
2012-03-06 19:20 ` Paul Gortmaker [this message]
2012-03-06 19:20 ` Paul Gortmaker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4F566384.5050501@windriver.com \
--to=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox