From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: <aleksey.makarov@auriga.com>, <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
<paul.burton@imgtec.com>, <david.daney@cavium.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
<davidlohr@hp.com>, <kirill@shutemov.name>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS64: Support of at least 48 bits of SEGBITS
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:01:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55565EC0.9030102@imgtec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55565BDF.6050503@gmail.com>
On 05/15/2015 01:49 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/14/2015 06:34 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>> SEGBITS default is 40 bits or less, depending from CPU type.
>> This patch introduces 48bits of application virtual address (SEGBITS)
>> support.
>> It is defined only for 16K and 64K pages and is optional (configurable).
>>
>> Penalty - a small number of additional pages for generic (small)
>> applications.
>> But for 64K pages it adds 3rd level of PTE structure, which has a little
>> impact during software TLB refill.
>>
>> This patch is needed because MIPS I6XXX and P6XXX cores have 48 bit of
>> virtual address in each segment (SEGBITS).
>>
>
> Those processors don't require the patch. You wrote the patch to give
> a larger VA space at the request of kernel users. So perhaps say:
>
> The patch (optionally) increases the VA space available to userspace
> processes from N-bits to 48-bits
>
... if CPU model supports that
>
>>
>> +config 48VMBITS
>
> Should probabaly be called VABITS instead of VMBITS to match the terms
> used in the architecture reference manuals, as well as other ports
> (ARM64).
>
> Perhaps MIPS_VA_BITS_48
I don't mind here. It can be even called 48SEGBITS or so, to match arch
manual more. MIPS Arch manual never says about VA bits but speaks about
PABITS and SEGBITS.
- Leonid.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Leonid Yegoshin <Leonid.Yegoshin@imgtec.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
Cc: aleksey.makarov@auriga.com, james.hogan@imgtec.com,
paul.burton@imgtec.com, david.daney@cavium.com,
peterz@infradead.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
davidlohr@hp.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MIPS64: Support of at least 48 bits of SEGBITS
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:01:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55565EC0.9030102@imgtec.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20150515210152.emUtHcT-z94W9bg7Bc9NfNsKfnuM1eLNRuR42PvU6xg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55565BDF.6050503@gmail.com>
On 05/15/2015 01:49 PM, David Daney wrote:
> On 05/14/2015 06:34 PM, Leonid Yegoshin wrote:
>> SEGBITS default is 40 bits or less, depending from CPU type.
>> This patch introduces 48bits of application virtual address (SEGBITS)
>> support.
>> It is defined only for 16K and 64K pages and is optional (configurable).
>>
>> Penalty - a small number of additional pages for generic (small)
>> applications.
>> But for 64K pages it adds 3rd level of PTE structure, which has a little
>> impact during software TLB refill.
>>
>> This patch is needed because MIPS I6XXX and P6XXX cores have 48 bit of
>> virtual address in each segment (SEGBITS).
>>
>
> Those processors don't require the patch. You wrote the patch to give
> a larger VA space at the request of kernel users. So perhaps say:
>
> The patch (optionally) increases the VA space available to userspace
> processes from N-bits to 48-bits
>
... if CPU model supports that
>
>>
>> +config 48VMBITS
>
> Should probabaly be called VABITS instead of VMBITS to match the terms
> used in the architecture reference manuals, as well as other ports
> (ARM64).
>
> Perhaps MIPS_VA_BITS_48
I don't mind here. It can be even called 48SEGBITS or so, to match arch
manual more. MIPS Arch manual never says about VA bits but speaks about
PABITS and SEGBITS.
- Leonid.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 1:34 [PATCH v2] MIPS64: Support of at least 48 bits of SEGBITS Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-15 1:34 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-15 10:39 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2015-05-15 16:28 ` David Daney
2015-05-15 19:03 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-16 2:11 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2015-05-15 20:49 ` David Daney
2015-05-15 21:01 ` Leonid Yegoshin [this message]
2015-05-15 21:01 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-15 21:53 ` Ralf Baechle
2015-05-15 22:39 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-15 22:39 ` Leonid Yegoshin
2015-05-16 2:42 ` Joshua Kinard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55565EC0.9030102@imgtec.com \
--to=leonid.yegoshin@imgtec.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aleksey.makarov@auriga.com \
--cc=david.daney@cavium.com \
--cc=davidlohr@hp.com \
--cc=ddaney.cavm@gmail.com \
--cc=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.burton@imgtec.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox