* [PATCH]: c-r4k.c 5/7 unduplicate declarations
@ 2003-03-28 0:52 Juan Quintela
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Juan Quintela @ 2003-03-28 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ralf Baechle, mipslist
Hi
Lots of _flush_* functions are asigned the same value in the
case of only pcache or scache.
Later, Juan.
build/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c | 20 ++++++++------------
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff -puN build/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c~c-r4k_unduplicate_repated_code build/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c
--- 24/build/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c~c-r4k_unduplicate_repated_code 2003-03-28 00:58:39.000000000 +0100
+++ 24-quintela/build/arch/mips/mm/c-r4k.c 2003-03-28 01:01:43.000000000 +0100
@@ -699,12 +699,7 @@ static void __init setup_noscache_funcs(
}
break;
}
- _flush_cache_all = r4k_flush_pcache_all;
___flush_cache_all = r4k_flush_pcache_all;
- _flush_cache_mm = r4k_flush_cache_mm;
- _flush_cache_page = r4k_flush_cache_page;
- _flush_icache_page = r4k_flush_icache_page;
- _flush_cache_range = r4k_flush_cache_range;
_dma_cache_wback_inv = r4k_dma_cache_wback_inv_pc;
_dma_cache_wback = r4k_dma_cache_wback_inv_pc;
@@ -735,12 +730,7 @@ static void __init setup_scache_funcs(vo
break;
}
- _flush_cache_all = r4k_flush_pcache_all;
___flush_cache_all = r4k_flush_scache_all;
- _flush_cache_mm = r4k_flush_cache_mm;
- _flush_cache_range = r4k_flush_cache_range;
- _flush_cache_page = r4k_flush_cache_page;
- _flush_icache_page = r4k_flush_icache_page;
_dma_cache_wback_inv = r4k_dma_cache_wback_inv_sc;
_dma_cache_wback = r4k_dma_cache_wback_inv_sc;
@@ -793,6 +783,14 @@ void __init ld_mmu_r4xx0(void)
probe_dcache(config);
setup_scache(config);
+ _flush_cache_all = r4k_flush_pcache_all;
+ _flush_cache_range = r4k_flush_cache_range;
+ _flush_icache_range = r4k_flush_icache_range; /* Ouch */
+ _flush_cache_mm = r4k_flush_cache_mm;
+ _flush_cache_page = r4k_flush_cache_page;
+ _flush_dcache_page = r4k_flush_dcache_page;
+ _flush_icache_page = r4k_flush_icache_page;
+
switch(mips_cpu.cputype) {
case CPU_R4600: /* QED style two way caches? */
case CPU_R4700:
@@ -801,7 +799,6 @@ void __init ld_mmu_r4xx0(void)
_flush_cache_page = r4k_flush_cache_page_r4600;
}
- _flush_dcache_page = r4k_flush_dcache_page;
switch(read_c0_prid() & 0xfff0) {
case 0x2010:
@@ -813,7 +810,6 @@ void __init ld_mmu_r4xx0(void)
default:
_flush_cache_sigtramp = r4k_flush_cache_sigtramp;
}
- _flush_icache_range = r4k_flush_icache_range; /* Ouch */
__flush_cache_all();
}
_
--
In theory, practice and theory are the same, but in practice they
are different -- Larry McVoy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-03-28 0:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-28 0:52 [PATCH]: c-r4k.c 5/7 unduplicate declarations Juan Quintela
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox