Linux-mm Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jianyong Wu <wujianyong@hygon.cn>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	jianyong.wu@outlook.com, zhongyuan@hygon.cn, huangsj@hygon.cn,
	wangfengyu@hygon.cn, yingzhiwei@hygon.cn, justin.he@arm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/23] sched/topology: Introduce a NUMA distance matrix with unique distance values
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 10:48:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901084800.GI4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260827122816.756234-3-wujianyong@hygon.cn>

On Thu, Aug 27, 2026 at 08:27:55PM +0800, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> Builds a refined node distance matrix based on the raw NUMA distance matrix
> provided by BIOS. The refined matrix preserves the relative ordering of
> NUMA distances, while assigning distinct distance values to node pairs that
> originally shared identical distances within each matrix row. This matrix
> is exclusively used for cache-aware scheduling and has no impact on existing
> NUMA topology logic such as sched domain construction.
> 
> For example, consider a system with 4 NUMA nodes. The raw BIOS-provided
> distance matrix may look like this:
> 
>         NODE0  NODE1  NODE2  NODE3
> NODE0   10     20     20     30
> NODE1   20     10     20     25
> NODE2   20     20     10     20
> NODE3   30     25     20     10
> 
> Multiple duplicate distance values exist within each row. After the
> deduplication step, the refined distance matrix becomes:
> 
>         NODE0  NODE1  NODE2  NODE3
> NODE0   10     15     20     30
> NODE1   15     10     12     25
> NODE2   20     12     10     15
> NODE3   30     25     15     10
> 
> All entries in each row are now unique, while adhering to two core principles:
> 1. The relative distance ordering from the original matrix is preserved.
>    For instance, original distance(NODE0, NODE1) < distance(NODE0, NODE3),
>    and this relative relationship is retained in the refined matrix as well.
> 2. The matrix remains symmetric across its main diagonal. Maintaining
>    symmetry is critical to guarantee consistent pairwise node distances.
> 
> Each row of this refined NUMA distance matrix is sorted in ascending order to
> generate a unique per-node affinity sequence. This sequence will guide
> thread migration logic introduced in subsequent patches.

Hmm, I wonder if __build_all_zonelists() wants to use this, rather than
the unmodified distance table. This would ensure the node fallback order
is distinct between nodes.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-27 12:27 [RFC PATCH v2 00/23] sched: Scale cache-aware aggregation at LLC granularity Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/23] sched/topology: Add llc_to_node() to translate LLC id to NUMA node Jianyong Wu
2026-08-29 10:31   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-31  9:43     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/23] sched/topology: Introduce a NUMA distance matrix with unique distance values Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 11:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  6:57     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  7:13       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  7:37         ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  8:48   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-09-02  7:11     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/23] sched/topology: Introduce a macro to traverse node Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/23] sched/topology: Introduce a method to calculate the llc distance Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 13:12   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/23] sched/topology: Introduce a macro to traverse LLC inside node Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:27 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/23] sched/topology: Add sd_node for the NODE sched domain Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/23] sched/cache: Prioritize preferred NUMA node selection over LLC selection Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 13:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  7:44     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 13:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  8:05     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/23] sched/topology: Introduce a per-CPU tasks NUMA preferred counter Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 13:23   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  8:14     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-31 13:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  8:31     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 10:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 13:02         ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/23] sched/cache: Account percpu sd task NUMA preference Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  7:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01  8:41     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/23] sched/topology: Add per-sd scratch for the load balance affinity score Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  8:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 11:55     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/23] sched/cache: Introduce helpers for task migration decisions Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  9:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-02  5:08     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 11:32   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-02  5:46     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-02 21:11   ` Tim Chen
2026-09-03  2:04     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/23] sched/cache: Introduce rq affinity gain calculation Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01  9:58   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 12:23     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 10:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 12:34     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/23] sched/cache: Pick optimal src rq/group using affinity promotion metric Jianyong Wu
2026-08-27 12:28 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/23] sched/cache: Drop prefer_sibling restriction for llc_balance Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 10:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-01 13:25     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  1:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/23] sched/cache: Judge migration eligibility in LLC granularity Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:04 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/23] sched/cache: Allow un-throttled active balance to spread out of a full LLC Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:07 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/23] sched/fair: Fine-granularity NUMA balancing Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-09-02  6:43     ` Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:09 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/23] sched/cache: Scan all prefer nodes in thread group Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:10 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/23] sched/cache: Remove preferred LLC/node check no longer needed Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/23] sched/cache: Estimate utilization of the whole thread group Jianyong Wu
2026-09-01 14:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-08-28  2:13 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/23] sched/cache: Spread workloads within an estimated LLC range Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:14 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/23] sched/cache: Walk the preferred node from the preferred LLC Jianyong Wu
2026-08-28  2:15 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/23] sched/debug: Print task preferred LLC for scheduler debugging Jianyong Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901084800.GI4121339@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=huangsj@hygon.cn \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@outlook.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangfengyu@hygon.cn \
    --cc=wujianyong@hygon.cn \
    --cc=yingzhiwei@hygon.cn \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=zhongyuan@hygon.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox