From: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
To: Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <liam@infradead.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Harry Yoo <harry@kernel.org>,
Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>,
Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@suse.de>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 03:02:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260909100240.635595-1-usama.arif@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903182943.662461-1-kirill@shutemov.name>
On Thu, 3 Sep 2026 19:29:38 +0100 Kiryl Shutsemau <kirill@shutemov.name> wrote:
> From: "Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)" <kas@kernel.org>
>
> A store through a shared file mapping dirties the whole folio. With large
> page cache folios that turns a 4K store into 2M of writeback: one dirty
> bit per folio, and writeback has no way to know which part changed.
>
> XFS already knows better. iomap tracks dirty state per block and
> iomap_writeback_folio() submits only the dirty ranges, and the buffered
> write path sets just the range it copied. Only the mmap path throws that
> away, because iomap_dirty_folio() covers the whole folio.
>
> Narrowing the dirtying at page_mkwrite() time does not work on its own:
> set_pte_range() batch-maps a whole folio writable on the first shared
> write fault, so the stores that follow never fault and never reach the
> filesystem.
>
> So harvest the hardware instead. folio_clear_dirty_for_io() already calls
> folio_mkclean(), whose rmap walk reads pte_dirty() for every entry of the
> folio and throws it away. Those bits are the only record of which parts
> of a large folio were written through a mapping. Collect them there and
> hand the filesystem the runs that were dirty, through a new
> a_ops->dirty_folio_range().
>
> All of this is about PTE-mapped folios. A PMD-mapped folio has a single
> dirty bit for the 2M it maps, so there is nothing finer to harvest, and
> it keeps writing back whole. Keeping shared write faults off PMDs is a
> separate patch and not part of this posting.
>
> On a 512M file in 2M folios on XFS, storing one byte per folio and
> calling msync() wrote 512M before and writes 1M after, with identical
> minor fault counts.
Hi Kiryl,
The motivation makes sense to me. I will look into the patches.
Just wanted to check, the above xfs example, is that on an ARM host?
Thanks,
Usama
>
> Not addressed here:
>
> - Dirty accounting stays folio-granular. A 4K store still counts as 2M
> against dirty_ratio and balance_dirty_pages().
> - iomap_page_mkwrite() still allocates blocks for the whole folio.
> - Filesystems without per-block dirty state see no change.
>
> Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) (5):
> mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs
> mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest
> mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page
> iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying to the faulting page
> xfs: track mmap dirty state per block
>
> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 37 +++++++++++++-----
> fs/xfs/xfs_aops.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/fs.h | 3 ++
> include/linux/iomap.h | 2 +
> include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
> include/linux/rmap.h | 7 ++++
> mm/memory.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> mm/page-writeback.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> mm/rmap.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++------
> 9 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 0a0d1d55dad570724bf8c7ea83409639cfb4be9b
> --
> 2.54.0
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-09 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 18:29 [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: let folio_mkclean() report which pages had dirty PTEs Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:12 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-10 13:36 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] mm: add a_ops->dirty_folio_range() and use the mkclean dirty harvest Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:51 ` Usama Arif
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] mm: keep the mmap dirty range down to the faulting page Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] iomap: narrow page_mkwrite() dirtying " Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 18:29 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] xfs: track mmap dirty state per block Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-03 19:55 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] mm: sub-folio dirty tracking for PTE-mapped mmap writes Pedro Falcato
2026-09-03 21:18 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-07 10:15 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
2026-09-09 10:02 ` Usama Arif [this message]
2026-09-09 10:15 ` Kiryl Shutsemau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260909100240.635595-1-usama.arif@linux.dev \
--to=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=harry@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=lance.yang@linux.dev \
--cc=liam@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ljs@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=pfalcato@suse.de \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox