Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mmc: sdhci: use WP GPIO in sdhci_check_ro()

[Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>]

On 11/02/19 3:23 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Even though SDHCI controllers may have a dedicated WP pin that can be
> queried using the SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE register, some platforms may
> chose to use a separate regular GPIO to route the WP signal. Such a
> GPIO is typically represented using the wp-gpios property in the
> Device Tree.
> 
> Unfortunately, the current sdhci_check_ro() function does not make use
> of such GPIO when available: it either uses a host controller specific
> ->get_ro() operation, or uses the SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE. Several host
> controller specific ->get_ro() functions are implemented just to check
> a WP GPIO state.
> 
> Instead of pushing this to more controller-specific implementations,
> let's handle this in the core SDHCI code, just like it is already done
> for the CD GPIO in sdhci_get_cd().
> 
> The below patch simply changes sdhci_check_ro() to use the value of
> the WP GPIO if available. We need to adjust the prototype of the
> function to use a mmc_host* as argument instead of sdhci_host*, since
> the mmc_can_gpio_ro() and mmc_gpio_get_ro() helpers take a mmc_host*.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> 
>  - As suggested by Adrian Hunter, call the ->get_ro() if it exists
>    before falling back to using mmc_gpio_get_ro(). Indeed, if the
>    controller-specific code has implemented a ->get_ro() callback, it
>    should take precedence over what the SDHCI core does.
> 
>    Due to this change, I have not added Thierry Redding Reviewed-by.
> 
>  - Fix typo in the commit log noticed by Thierry Redding.
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 9 ++++++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> index df05352b6a4a..e6682ea5f7c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
> @@ -2022,8 +2022,9 @@ static int sdhci_get_cd(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  	return !!(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE) & SDHCI_CARD_PRESENT);
>  }
>  
> -static int sdhci_check_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +static int sdhci_check_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)

Please let's not change the parameter.

>  {
> +	struct sdhci_host *host = mmc_priv(mmc);
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int is_readonly;
>  
> @@ -2033,6 +2034,8 @@ static int sdhci_check_ro(struct sdhci_host *host)
>  		is_readonly = 0;
>  	else if (host->ops->get_ro)
>  		is_readonly = host->ops->get_ro(host);
> +	else if (mmc_can_gpio_ro(mmc))
> +		is_readonly = mmc_gpio_get_ro(mmc);

Just make it 'host->mmc' instead of 'mmc'

>  	else
>  		is_readonly = !(sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_PRESENT_STATE)
>  				& SDHCI_WRITE_PROTECT);
> @@ -2052,11 +2055,11 @@ static int sdhci_get_ro(struct mmc_host *mmc)
>  	int i, ro_count;
>  
>  	if (!(host->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_UNSTABLE_RO_DETECT))
> -		return sdhci_check_ro(host);
> +		return sdhci_check_ro(mmc);
>  
>  	ro_count = 0;
>  	for (i = 0; i < SAMPLE_COUNT; i++) {
> -		if (sdhci_check_ro(host)) {
> +		if (sdhci_check_ro(mmc)) {
>  			if (++ro_count > SAMPLE_COUNT / 2)
>  				return 1;
>  		}
>