Re: [PATCH v2] UBI: add lnum to struct ubi_work

[Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1204 bytes --]

On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 14:14 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 20:47 +0200, Joel Reardon wrote:
> > @@ -1086,13 +1090,14 @@ out_ro:
> >   * @ubi: UBI device description object
> >   * @pnum: physical eraseblock to return
> >   * @torture: if this physical eraseblock has to be tortured
> > + * @lnum: the last used logical eraseblock number for the PEB
> >   *
> >   * This function is called to return physical eraseblock @pnum to the pool of
> >   * free physical eraseblocks. The @torture flag has to be set if an I/O error
> >   * occurred to this @pnum and it has to be tested. This function returns zero
> >   * in case of success, and a negative error code in case of failure.
> >   */
> > -int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
> > +int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture, int lnum)
> 
> Joel, am sorry for nitpicking again, but could you please put the "lnum"
> argument between "ubi" and "lnum" instead? Just feels more natural.
> Otherwise the patch is OK. Thanks!

Err, but you also need volume ID, because there may be several volumes
with the same lnum.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]