* Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function
@ 2007-07-11 16:25 akorolev
2007-07-11 16:35 ` David Woodhouse
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: akorolev @ 2007-07-11 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-MTD Mailing List, David Woodhouse
Hi All
I'm currently working on JFFS2 improving. I faced some issues with
understanding why we need to align start offset to 4 bytes in
jffs2_commit_write function?
Here is the part of this code:
=========================
unsigned aligned_start = start & ~3;
.........................................
/* Adjust writtenlen for the padding we did, so we don't confuse our
caller */
if (writtenlen < (start&3))
writtenlen = 0;
else
writtenlen -= (start&3);
===========================
What does the padding mean here?
If I properly understand the aligned_start is not related to offset of
the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is aligned)
File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to kick off
it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).
Thanks,
Alexey
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function
2007-07-11 16:25 Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function akorolev
@ 2007-07-11 16:35 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-11 16:43 ` akorolev
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Woodhouse @ 2007-07-11 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: akorolev; +Cc: Linux-MTD Mailing List
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:25 +0400, akorolev wrote:
> If I properly understand the aligned_start is not related to offset of
> the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is
> aligned) File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to
> kick off it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).
Consider:
while (1)
write(fd, "x", 1);
This is fairly much worst-case behaviour for JFFS2, and you end up with
a _large_ number of data nodes. One thing we've done to improve
behaviour in this situation is rewrite the entire page when we write the
last byte in a page -- but that doesn't fix _all_ cases.
Since data nodes _are_ aligned to 4 bytes, it doesn't hurt us at all to
write a full 4 bytes instead of only 1 byte. So you'll have a maximum of
1024 data nodes for a given 4KiB page even if you don't manage to
trigger the code which rewrites the page.
--
dwmw2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function
2007-07-11 16:35 ` David Woodhouse
@ 2007-07-11 16:43 ` akorolev
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: akorolev @ 2007-07-11 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Linux-MTD Mailing List
Aghh I see.
Thank you very much!
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:25 +0400, akorolev wrote:
>
>> If I properly understand the aligned_start is not related to offset of
>> the fragment it is just offset within the file. (Frag offset is
>> aligned) File offset is not necessary to keep aligned - so why not to
>> kick off it. (I tried and didn't find anything wrong in tests).
>>
>
> Consider:
> while (1)
> write(fd, "x", 1);
>
> This is fairly much worst-case behaviour for JFFS2, and you end up with
> a _large_ number of data nodes. One thing we've done to improve
> behaviour in this situation is rewrite the entire page when we write the
> last byte in a page -- but that doesn't fix _all_ cases.
>
> Since data nodes _are_ aligned to 4 bytes, it doesn't hurt us at all to
> write a full 4 bytes instead of only 1 byte. So you'll have a maximum of
> 1024 data nodes for a given 4KiB page even if you don't manage to
> trigger the code which rewrites the page.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-11 16:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-11 16:25 Why the alignemt to 4 bytes is necessary in jffs2_commit_write function akorolev
2007-07-11 16:35 ` David Woodhouse
2007-07-11 16:43 ` akorolev
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox