* About PID...???!!! @ 2003-09-10 14:23 Silambu Chelvan 2003-09-10 15:21 ` John T. Williams 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Silambu Chelvan @ 2003-09-10 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-newbie Hi All, I have been using linux for quite some time. I wonder how the PID is assigned by the kernel. Is there anything like range of PID for each user? In my machine I could see PIDs of 256, 389, 413 etc. Does this mean that there are almost 413 processes running? Please explain..... with regards, M. SilambuChelvan __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 14:23 About PID...???!!! Silambu Chelvan @ 2003-09-10 15:21 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-newbie They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never reused until the machine reboots. A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been 412 other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, you've run a process. 413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is at PIDs that start at 20000 I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low as 412. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Silambu Chelvan" <silambu_mdu@yahoo.com> To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: About PID...???!!! > Hi All, > > I have been using linux for quite some time. I wonder > how the PID is assigned by the kernel. Is there > anything like range of PID for each user? In my > machine I could see PIDs of 256, 389, 413 etc. Does > this mean that there are almost 413 processes running? > > Please explain..... > > with regards, > M. SilambuChelvan > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software > http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 15:21 ` John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 18:03 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ray Olszewski @ 2003-09-10 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-newbie At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never reused >until the machine reboots. This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids that are still in use from the last round of assignment. >A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been 412 >other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, you've >run a process. > >413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is at >PIDs that start at 20000 > >I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low as >412. Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for and, naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way up there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes very much, is only at pid 828. And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid 1) and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap; pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] process names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski @ 2003-09-10 18:03 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ray Olszewski, linux-newbie definitely higher then 2^16, I've got a process with the PID of 69917 I would guess MAX_INT which is 2^32 -1 = 4294967295 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Olszewski" <ray@comarre.com> To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: > >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never reused > >until the machine reboots. > > This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at > 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids > that are still in use from the last round of assignment. > > >A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been 412 > >other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, you've > >run a process. > > > >413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is at > >PIDs that start at 20000 > > > >I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low as > >412. > > Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for and, > naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way up > there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes > very much, is only at pid 828. > > And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go > back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid 1) > and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap; > pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] process > names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins. > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 18:03 ` John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:56 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams 1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-newbie definitely higher then 2^16, I've got a process with the PID of 69917 I would guess MAX_INT which is 2^32 -1 = 4294967295 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ray Olszewski" <ray@comarre.com> To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:58 AM Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: > >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never reused > >until the machine reboots. > > This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at > 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids > that are still in use from the last round of assignment. > > >A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been 412 > >other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, you've > >run a process. > > > >413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is at > >PIDs that start at 20000 > > > >I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low as > >412. > > Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for and, > naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way up > there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes > very much, is only at pid 828. > > And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go > back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid 1) > and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap; > pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] process > names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins. > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 18:56 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ray Olszewski @ 2003-09-10 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-newbie At 02:04 PM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: >definitely higher then 2^16, I've got a process with the PID of 69917 >I would guess MAX_INT which is 2^32 -1 = 4294967295 Actually, as it turns out, the right answer is "it depends". Checking my kernel source, I find that the kernel's fork() routine checks against PID_MAX before wrapping. This value is defined, at least for 2.4.19, in <kernel_source_path>/include/linux/threads.h . My (Debian) kernel source has there #define PID_MAX 0x8000 which matches my observed wrapping at (or near) 32768 . You might see if your kernel source sets this value higher. >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ray Olszewski" <ray@comarre.com> >To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> >Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:58 AM >Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > > > > At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: > > >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never >reused > > >until the machine reboots. > > > > This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at > > 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids > > that are still in use from the last round of assignment. [...] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:56 ` Ray Olszewski @ 2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 19:17 ` John T. Williams 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John T. Williams, linux-newbie Alright Alright, I concede it does loop, I should have used the word never. I'll change it to rarely and be done with it, in any case I think Silambu got his answer which briefly is: No PID = 412 doesn't mean there are 412 process currently running on your machine. Read the man page for ps to learn how to identify processes that are currently running. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John T. Williams" <jowillia@vt.edu> To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:04 PM Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > definitely higher then 2^16, I've got a process with the PID of 69917 > I would guess MAX_INT which is 2^32 -1 = 4294967295 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ray Olszewski" <ray@comarre.com> > To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:58 AM > Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > > > > At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: > > >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never > reused > > >until the machine reboots. > > > > This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* at > > 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids > > that are still in use from the last round of assignment. > > > > >A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been > 412 > > >other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, > you've > > >run a process. > > > > > >413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot is > at > > >PIDs that start at 20000 > > > > > >I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as low > as > > >412. > > > > Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for > and, > > naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way up > > there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes > > very much, is only at pid 828. > > > > And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go > > back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid 1) > > and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap; > > pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] process > > names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins. > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: About PID...???!!! 2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 19:17 ` John T. Williams 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: John T. Williams @ 2003-09-10 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John T. Williams, linux-newbie should not have used ----- Original Message ----- From: "John T. Williams" <jowillia@vt.edu> To: "John T. Williams" <jtwilliams@vt.edu>; <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:15 PM Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > Alright Alright, I concede it does loop, I should have used the word never. > I'll change it to rarely and be done with it, in any case I think Silambu > got his answer which briefly is: > > No PID = 412 doesn't mean there are 412 process currently running on your > machine. > Read the man page for ps to learn how to identify processes that are > currently running. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John T. Williams" <jowillia@vt.edu> > To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 2:04 PM > Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > > > > definitely higher then 2^16, I've got a process with the PID of 69917 > > I would guess MAX_INT which is 2^32 -1 = 4294967295 > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ray Olszewski" <ray@comarre.com> > > To: <linux-newbie@vger.kernel.org> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2003 11:58 AM > > Subject: Re: About PID...???!!! > > > > > > > At 11:21 AM 9/10/2003 -0400, John T. Williams wrote: > > > >They are assigned linearly, however once a pid is used, it is never > > reused > > > >until the machine reboots. > > > > > > This is not quite correct. The pid assignment process wraps, I *think* > at > > > 32767 (or maybe 65535). Next time around, the kernel skips over any pids > > > that are still in use from the last round of assignment. > > > > > > >A pid of 413 means that when that process was fork()'ed there had been > > 412 > > > >other processes already created. But remember every time you type ls, > > you've > > > >run a process. > > > > > > > >413 isn't a large pid at all. My linux box which I very rarely reboot > is > > at > > > >PIDs that start at 20000 > > > > > > > >I'm surprised that any program you start after the boot process is as > low > > as > > > >412. > > > > > > Whether that is surprising or not depends on what he uses the host for > > and, > > > naturally, on how recently it was rebooted. While my workstation is way > up > > > there (30180), my Linux-based router, which does not start new processes > > > very much, is only at pid 828. > > > > > > And, of course, there are persistent processes on any Linux host that go > > > back to the boot/init process ... starting with init itself (always pid > 1) > > > and including long-lived daemons such as syslogd, klogd, and portmap; > > > pseudo processes that are actually run in the kernel (mostly [k*] > process > > > names); and getty proceses listening on VTs that never get logins. > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" > in > > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-newbie" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.linux-learn.org/faqs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-10 19:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-09-10 14:23 About PID...???!!! Silambu Chelvan 2003-09-10 15:21 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 15:58 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 18:03 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:04 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 18:56 ` Ray Olszewski 2003-09-10 19:15 ` John T. Williams 2003-09-10 19:17 ` John T. Williams
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox