* linux-next: sfi tree build failure
@ 2009-06-30 7:19 Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-06 6:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-06-30 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfi-devel; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1133 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
from init/main.c:27:
include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:64:22: error: asm/acpi.h: No such file or directory
In file included from include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:130,
from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
from init/main.c:27:
include/acpi/actypes.h:130: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'UINT64'
include/acpi/actypes.h:131: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'INT64'
include/acpi/actypes.h:910: error: expected ')' before '*' token
include/acpi/actypes.h:913: error: expected ')' before '*' token
and it went downhill from there :-(
I have dropped the sfi tree for today.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-06-30 7:19 linux-next: sfi tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-07-06 6:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 4:01 ` Len Brown
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-07-06 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sfi-devel; +Cc: linux-next, linux-kernel, Len Brown
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1353 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> In file included from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
> from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
> from init/main.c:27:
> include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:64:22: error: asm/acpi.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:130,
> from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
> from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
> from init/main.c:27:
> include/acpi/actypes.h:130: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'UINT64'
> include/acpi/actypes.h:131: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before 'INT64'
> include/acpi/actypes.h:910: error: expected ')' before '*' token
> include/acpi/actypes.h:913: error: expected ')' before '*' token
>
> and it went downhill from there :-(
>
> I have dropped the sfi tree for today.
And the sfi tree has still not made it into linux-next as the above error
still exists.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-07-06 6:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-07-07 4:01 ` Len Brown
2009-07-07 4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-07-07 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: sfi-devel, linux-next, linux-kernel
> On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
> > from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> > from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
> > from init/main.c:27:
> > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:64:22: error: asm/acpi.h: No such file or directory
...
> > I have dropped the sfi tree for today.
>
> And the sfi tree has still not made it into linux-next as the above error
> still exists.
Sorry about breaking the PPC build, Stephen.
I screwed up in my hack attempt to support CONFIG_SFI=y && CONFIG_ACPI=n.
Let me know if you have any trouble with the latest SFI test tree.
thanks,
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-07-07 4:01 ` Len Brown
@ 2009-07-07 4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-07-07 4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: sfi-devel, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 458 bytes --]
Hi Len,
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> I screwed up in my hack attempt to support CONFIG_SFI=y && CONFIG_ACPI=n.
Yeah, I figured something like that.
> Let me know if you have any trouble with the latest SFI test tree.
I have refetched the sfi tree (as I had not merged it yet today).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-07-07 4:01 ` Len Brown
2009-07-07 4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-07-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 15:31 ` Len Brown
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-07-07 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: sfi-devel, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1157 bytes --]
Hi Len,
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:01:13 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:19:37 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > >
> > > In file included from include/acpi/platform/acenv.h:141,
> > > from include/acpi/acpi.h:56,
> > > from include/linux/acpi.h:38,
> > > from init/main.c:27:
> > > include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h:64:22: error: asm/acpi.h: No such file or directory
> ...
> > > I have dropped the sfi tree for today.
> >
> > And the sfi tree has still not made it into linux-next as the above error
> > still exists.
>
> Sorry about breaking the PPC build, Stephen.
>
> I screwed up in my hack attempt to support CONFIG_SFI=y && CONFIG_ACPI=n.
>
> Let me know if you have any trouble with the latest SFI test tree.
I still get the same error. Note that asm/acpi.h is being included from
include/acpi/platform/aclinux.h
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-07-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2009-07-07 15:31 ` Len Brown
2009-07-08 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2009-07-07 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: sfi-devel, linux-next, linux-kernel
> I still get the same error.
git.kernel.org took a long time to update from master.kerne.org
last night. (indeed, I was sending patches through e-mail to
some folks to work around it); so I suspect you pulled the SFI
tree before the mirror updated and got the same thing you
got over the weekend.
surfing to git.kernel.org, it seems to be up to date now.
The tree should include this one of interest:
commit 4844be551844e05d4b70f0624e9c34fd486d3e33
Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date: Mon Jul 6 23:57:55 2009 -0400
SFI: revert changes to linux/acpi.h, fix ppc build
Note that Linus pulls from master.kernel.org rather than git.kernel.org
to avoid any possible sync delay between tree push and his pull.
If you have trouble with a copy of the tree that includes
the commit above, (I don't expect to see the same failure,
but it is always possible there is another one after this one),
then please send me the complete build log.
cheers,
-Len
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: sfi tree build failure
2009-07-07 15:31 ` Len Brown
@ 2009-07-08 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2009-07-08 0:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown; +Cc: sfi-devel, linux-next, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1578 bytes --]
Hi Len,
On Tue, 07 Jul 2009 11:31:06 -0400 (EDT) Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > I still get the same error.
>
> git.kernel.org took a long time to update from master.kerne.org
> last night. (indeed, I was sending patches through e-mail to
> some folks to work around it); so I suspect you pulled the SFI
> tree before the mirror updated and got the same thing you
> got over the weekend.
I fetch from master ... and did get an update.
> surfing to git.kernel.org, it seems to be up to date now.
>
> The tree should include this one of interest:
>
> commit 4844be551844e05d4b70f0624e9c34fd486d3e33
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Date: Mon Jul 6 23:57:55 2009 -0400
>
> SFI: revert changes to linux/acpi.h, fix ppc build
It has that now. When I refetched yesterday, the head of sfi-test branch
was c24b5f47a66895c2f2ac6e8b665c94f7854e32b4 ("SFI: work around ppc build
failure") which is the commit before the above one.
It doesn't matter, hopefully it will be better today.
> Note that Linus pulls from master.kernel.org rather than git.kernel.org
> to avoid any possible sync delay between tree push and his pull.
As do I for the same reason.
> If you have trouble with a copy of the tree that includes
> the commit above, (I don't expect to see the same failure,
> but it is always possible there is another one after this one),
> then please send me the complete build log.
Will do.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-08 0:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-06-30 7:19 linux-next: sfi tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-06 6:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 4:01 ` Len Brown
2009-07-07 4:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 5:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-07-07 15:31 ` Len Brown
2009-07-08 0:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox