From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:48:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216147693-23881-2-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1216147693-23881-1-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu>
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
nlmsvc_testlock calls nlmsvc_lookup_host to find a nlm_host struct. The
callers of this functions, however, call nlmsvc_retrieve_args or
nlm4svc_retrieve_args, which also return a nlm_host struct.
Change nlmsvc_testlock to take a host arg instead of calling
nlmsvc_lookup_host itself and change the callers to pass a pointer to
the nlm_host they've already found.
We take a reference to host in the place where nlmsvc_testlock()
previous did a new lookup, so the reference counting is unchanged from
before.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
---
fs/lockd/svc4proc.c | 2 +-
fs/lockd/svclock.c | 12 +++---------
fs/lockd/svcproc.c | 2 +-
include/linux/lockd/lockd.h | 3 ++-
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
index 006a832..8cfb9da 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ nlm4svc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_args *argp,
return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success;
/* Now check for conflicting locks */
- resp->status = nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie);
+ resp->status = nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie);
if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply)
rc = rpc_drop_reply;
else
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svclock.c b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
index 81aca85..f40afb3 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svclock.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svclock.c
@@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ out:
*/
__be32
nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
- struct nlm_lock *lock, struct nlm_lock *conflock,
- struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
+ struct nlm_host *host, struct nlm_lock *lock,
+ struct nlm_lock *conflock, struct nlm_cookie *cookie)
{
struct nlm_block *block = NULL;
int error;
@@ -479,16 +479,10 @@ nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_file *file,
if (block == NULL) {
struct file_lock *conf = kzalloc(sizeof(*conf), GFP_KERNEL);
- struct nlm_host *host;
if (conf == NULL)
return nlm_granted;
- /* Create host handle for callback */
- host = nlmsvc_lookup_host(rqstp, lock->caller, lock->len);
- if (host == NULL) {
- kfree(conf);
- return nlm_lck_denied_nolocks;
- }
+ nlm_get_host(host);
block = nlmsvc_create_block(rqstp, host, file, lock, cookie);
if (block == NULL) {
kfree(conf);
diff --git a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
index fce3d70..e099f58 100644
--- a/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ nlmsvc_proc_test(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct nlm_args *argp,
return resp->status == nlm_drop_reply ? rpc_drop_reply :rpc_success;
/* Now check for conflicting locks */
- resp->status = cast_status(nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie));
+ resp->status = cast_status(nlmsvc_testlock(rqstp, file, host, &argp->lock, &resp->lock, &resp->cookie));
if (resp->status == nlm_drop_reply)
rc = rpc_drop_reply;
else
diff --git a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
index 102d928..b279670 100644
--- a/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
+++ b/include/linux/lockd/lockd.h
@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ __be32 nlmsvc_lock(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_file *,
struct nlm_lock *, int, struct nlm_cookie *);
__be32 nlmsvc_unlock(struct nlm_file *, struct nlm_lock *);
__be32 nlmsvc_testlock(struct svc_rqst *, struct nlm_file *,
- struct nlm_lock *, struct nlm_lock *, struct nlm_cookie *);
+ struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_lock *,
+ struct nlm_lock *, struct nlm_cookie *);
__be32 nlmsvc_cancel_blocked(struct nlm_file *, struct nlm_lock *);
unsigned long nlmsvc_retry_blocked(void);
void nlmsvc_traverse_blocks(struct nlm_host *, struct nlm_file *,
--
1.5.5.rc1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-12 13:17 [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock Jeff Layton
2008-07-15 18:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] lockd: nlm_release_host() checks for NULL, caller needn't J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] lockd: minor svclock.c style fixes J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:32 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20080715153222.1a894180-RtJpwOs3+0O+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-15 19:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:13 ` [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216147693-23881-2-git-send-email-bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--to=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox