From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:45:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080715184554.GD21590@fieldses.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1215868630-28201-1-git-send-email-jlayton@redhat.com>
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:17:10AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Both nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock call nlmsvc_lookup_host to find a
> nlm_host struct. All the callers of these functions, however, call
> nlmsvc_retrieve_args or nlm4svc_retrieve_args which also return a
> nlm_host struct.
>
> Change nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock to take a host arg instead of
> calling nlmsvc_lookup_host themselves and change the callers to pass
> a pointer to the nlm_host they've already found.
That makes sense to me, thanks.
> Also, get rid of some unneeded nlm_host NULL checks.
>
> I think I've got the reference counting right with this patch, but
> I wouldn't mind someone sanity checking it.
So, the way I do that sanity-checking is by breaking up the individual
changes as finely as I can, as follows....
--b.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-15 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-12 13:17 [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock Jeff Layton
2008-07-15 18:45 ` J. Bruce Fields [this message]
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] lockd: nlm_release_host() checks for NULL, caller needn't J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] lockd: minor svclock.c style fixes J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:32 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20080715153222.1a894180-RtJpwOs3+0O+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-15 19:41 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:13 ` [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080715184554.GD21590@fieldses.org \
--to=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox