public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 15:13:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080715151301.2c9cdc4e@tleilax.poochiereds.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080715184554.GD21590@fieldses.org>

On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:45:54 -0400
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 09:17:10AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Both nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock call nlmsvc_lookup_host to find a
> > nlm_host struct. All the callers of these functions, however, call
> > nlmsvc_retrieve_args or nlm4svc_retrieve_args which also return a
> > nlm_host struct.
> > 
> > Change nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock to take a host arg instead of
> > calling nlmsvc_lookup_host themselves and change the callers to pass
> > a pointer to the nlm_host they've already found.
> 
> That makes sense to me, thanks.
> 
> > Also, get rid of some unneeded nlm_host NULL checks.
> > 
> > I think I've got the reference counting right with this patch, but
> > I wouldn't mind someone sanity checking it.
> 
> So, the way I do that sanity-checking is by breaking up the individual
> changes as finely as I can, as follows....
> 
> --b.

Thanks Bruce,
  The patchset in your for-2.6.27 branch looks fine to me.

Cheers,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2008-07-15 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-12 13:17 [PATCH] lockd: eliminate duplicate calls to nlmsvc_lookup_host in nlmsvc_lock and nlmsvc_testlock Jeff Layton
2008-07-15 18:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48   ` [PATCH 1/4] lockd: nlm_release_host() checks for NULL, caller needn't J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48     ` [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48       ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:48         ` [PATCH 4/4] lockd: minor svclock.c style fixes J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 18:56         ` [PATCH 3/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_lock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:09       ` [PATCH 2/4] lockd: eliminate duplicate nlmsvc_lookup_host call from nlmsvc_testlock J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:32         ` Jeff Layton
     [not found]           ` <20080715153222.1a894180-RtJpwOs3+0O+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-15 19:41             ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-07-15 19:13   ` Jeff Layton [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080715151301.2c9cdc4e@tleilax.poochiereds.net \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox