public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 04/12] sunrpc/cache: recheck cache validity after cache_defer_req
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:22:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090804052238.15929.56800.stgit@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090804051145.15929.11356.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>

If cache_defer_req did not leave the request on a queue, then it could
possibly have waited long enough that the cache became valid.  So check the
status after the call.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---

 net/sunrpc/cache.c |   53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
index c1f897c..bff4baa 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c
@@ -173,6 +173,22 @@ struct cache_head *sunrpc_cache_update(struct cache_detail *detail,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sunrpc_cache_update);
 
 static int cache_make_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h);
+
+static inline int cache_is_valid(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h)
+{
+	if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &h->flags) ||
+	    h->expiry_time < get_seconds())
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	else if (detail->flush_time > h->last_refresh)
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	else {
+		/* entry is valid */
+		if (test_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags))
+			return -ENOENT;
+		else
+			return 0;
+	}
+}
 /*
  * This is the generic cache management routine for all
  * the authentication caches.
@@ -181,8 +197,10 @@ static int cache_make_upcall(struct cache_detail *detail, struct cache_head *h);
  *
  *
  * Returns 0 if the cache_head can be used, or cache_puts it and returns
- * -EAGAIN if upcall is pending,
- * -ETIMEDOUT if upcall failed and should be retried,
+ * -EAGAIN if upcall is pending and request has been queued
+ * -ETIMEDOUT if upcall failed or request could not be queue or
+ *           upcall completed but item is still invalid (implying that
+ *           the cache item has been replaced with a newer one).
  * -ENOENT if cache entry was negative
  */
 int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
@@ -192,17 +210,7 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
 	long refresh_age, age;
 
 	/* First decide return status as best we can */
-	if (!test_bit(CACHE_VALID, &h->flags) ||
-	    h->expiry_time < get_seconds())
-		rv = -EAGAIN;
-	else if (detail->flush_time > h->last_refresh)
-		rv = -EAGAIN;
-	else {
-		/* entry is valid */
-		if (test_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &h->flags))
-			rv = -ENOENT;
-		else rv = 0;
-	}
+	rv = cache_is_valid(detail, h);
 
 	/* now see if we want to start an upcall */
 	refresh_age = (h->expiry_time - h->last_refresh);
@@ -235,10 +243,14 @@ int cache_check(struct cache_detail *detail,
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (rv == -EAGAIN)
-		if (cache_defer_req(rqstp, h) != 0)
-			rv = -ETIMEDOUT;
-
+	if (rv == -EAGAIN) {
+		if (cache_defer_req(rqstp, h) == 0) {
+			/* Request is not deferred */
+			rv = cache_is_valid(detail, h);
+			if (rv == -EAGAIN)
+				rv = -ETIMEDOUT;
+		}
+	}
 	if (rv)
 		cache_put(h, detail);
 	return rv;
@@ -557,11 +569,11 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
 		 * or continue and drop the oldest below
 		 */
 		if (net_random()&1)
-			return -ETIMEDOUT;
+			return 0;
 	}
 	dreq = req->defer(req);
 	if (dreq == NULL)
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+		return 0;
 
 	dreq->item = item;
 
@@ -591,8 +603,9 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item)
 	if (!test_bit(CACHE_PENDING, &item->flags)) {
 		/* must have just been validated... */
 		cache_revisit_request(item);
+		return 0;
 	}
-	return 0;
+	return 1;
 }
 
 static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item)



  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-08-04  5:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-04  5:22 [PATCH 00/12] Some improvements to request deferral and related code NeilBrown
     [not found] ` <20090804051145.15929.11356.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04  5:22   ` NeilBrown [this message]
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.56800.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:42       ` [PATCH 04/12] sunrpc/cache: recheck cache validity after cache_defer_req J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-06  4:57         ` Neil Brown
     [not found]           ` <19066.25248.283061.383233-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 21:50             ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-26  0:42               ` Neil Brown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 01/12] sunrpc/cache: rename queue_loose to cache_dequeue NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.91015.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 14:05       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 02/12] sunrpc/cache: make sure deferred requests eventually get revisited NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.74402.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 15:02       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 03/12] sunrpc/cache: simplify cache_fresh_locked and cache_fresh_unlocked NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052238.15929.17142.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 15:45       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 05/12] sunrpc/cache: use list_del_init for the list_head entries in cache_deferred_req NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 10/12] sunrpc: fix memory leak in unix_gid cache NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052239.15929.71459.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:55       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 11/12] sunrpc/cache: change deferred-request hash table to use hlist NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 08/12] sunrpc/cache: retry cache lookups that return -ETIMEDOUT NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 09/12] nfsd/idmap: drop special request deferal in favour of improved default NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 06/12] sunrpc/cache: avoid variable over-loading in cache_defer_req NeilBrown
     [not found]     ` <20090804052239.15929.87201.stgit-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-04 20:47       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-06  4:35         ` Neil Brown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 07/12] sunrpc/cache: allow thread to block while waiting for cache update NeilBrown
2009-08-04  5:22   ` [PATCH 12/12] sunrpc: close connection when a request is irretrievably lost NeilBrown
2009-08-04 14:04   ` [PATCH 00/12] Some improvements to request deferral and related code J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-07  4:13     ` Neil Brown
     [not found]       ` <19067.43518.105153.247173-wvvUuzkyo1EYVZTmpyfIwg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-10 15:05         ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090804052238.15929.56800.stgit@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox